Conception d’une grille d’observation de la résolution collaborative de problèmes (RCP)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53967/cje-rce.5447Keywords:
Observation grid, Problem solving, Collaboration, CPS, ProgrammingAbstract
Collaborative problem solving (CPS) has been the subject of many studies and reflections over the years. Given our realization that there are very few tools for studying CPS in an authentic context, we thought it would be relevant to propose one. This article presents the steps that led to the design of a CPS observation grid. Based on Strayer and Gauthier’s (1982) model, we present the process structured in three parts: the descriptive phase, the exploratory phase, and the systematic evaluation. This last phase, conducted with the help of a videography device, was carried out with 109 primary school students in three Quebec schools. Composed of three dimensions through which 15 indicators are distributed, this grid offers an interesting perspective on the qualitative and interpretative observation of the mobilization of CPS skills. This tool makes it possible to calculate frequencies, but also to interpret the behaviours associated with each of the indicators in order to formulate hypotheses or to allow school personnel to orient their interventions or teaching practices according to the needs of the students.
References
Baron, G.-L. et Bruillard, É. (2001). Une didactique de l’informatique ? Revue Française de Pédagogie, (135), 163–172. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41201696
Barr, V. et Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is Involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/1929887.1929905
Béziat, J. (2012, 3-4 mai). Les TIC à l’école primaire en France : informatique et programmation [Communication]. Colloque scientifique international sur les TIC en éducation : bilan, enjeux et perspectives futures, Montréal. https://www.epi.asso.fr/revue/articles/a1311d.htm
Care, E. et Griffin, P. (2017). Assessment of collaborative problem-solving processes. Dans B. Csapó et J. Funke (dir.), The nature of problem solving. Using research to inspire 21st century learning (p. 227–243). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264273955-16-en
Çetin, M. et Demircan, H. Ö. (2020). Empowering technology and engineering for STEM education through programming robots: A systematic literature review. Early Child Development and Care, 190(9), 1323–1335. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2018.1534844
Chalkiadaki, A. (2018). A systematic literature review of 21st century skills and competencies in primary education. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1131a
Champoux, L., Couture, C. et Royer, É. (1992, aout). École et comportement. L’observation systématique du comportement. Direction de l’adaptation scolaire et des services complémentaires, ministère de l’Éducation du Québec. https://educationspecialisee.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/L_observation_du_comportement.pdf
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and psychological measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
Delcker, J. et Ifenthaler, D. (2017). Computational thinking as an interdisciplinary approach to computer science school curricula: A German perspective. Dans P. J. Rich et C. B. Hodges (dir.), Emerging research, practice and policy on computational thinking. Educational communications and technology: Issues and innovations (p. 49–62). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52691-1_4
Dillenbourg, P. et Traum, D. (2006). Sharing solutions: Persistence and grounding in multimodal collaborative problem solving. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 121–151. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1501_9
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-Konsultit.
Fessakis, G., Gouli, E. et Mavroudi, E. (2013). Problem solving by 5–6 years old kindergarten children in a computer programming environment: A case study. Computers & Education, 63, 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.016
Fortin, M.-F. et Gagnon, J. (2022). Fondements et étapes du processus de recherche : méthodes quantitatives et qualitatives (4e éd.). Chenelière éducation.
Forum économique mondial. (2016, 14 janvier). The Fourth Industrial Revolution: What it means, how to respond. Forum économique mondial. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/
Forum économique mondial. (2018, janvier). Towards a reskilling revolution: A future of jobs for all [Rapport]. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_FOW_Reskilling_Revolution.pdf
Greiff, S., Holt, D. et Funke, J. (2013). Perspectives on problem solving in educational assessment: Analytical, interactive, and collaborative problem solving. Journal of Problem Solving, 5(2), 71–91. http://hdl.handle.net/10993/3177
Griffin, P. et Care, E. (2015). The ATC21S Method. Dans P. Griffin et E. Care (dir.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach (p. 3–33). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9395-7_1
Guikas, I., Morin, D. et Bigras, M. (2016). Développement d’une grille d’observation : considérations théoriques et méthodologiques. Revue francophone de la déficience intellectuelle, 27, 163–178. https://doi.org/10.7202/1043131ar
Hanko, G. (2016). Inscreasing competence through collaborative problem-solving: Using insight into social and emotional factors in children’s learning (2e éd.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203065020
Harris, F. C. et Lahey, B. B. (1982). Recording system bias in direct observational methodology: A review and critical analysis of factors causing inaccurate coding behavior. Clinical Psychology Review, 2(4), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(82)90029-0
Henri, F. et Lundgren-Cayrol, K. (2001). Apprentissage collaboratif à distance. Pour comprendre et concevoir les environnements d’apprentissage virtuels. Presses de l’Université du Québec.
Hesse, F., Care, E., Buder, J., Sassenberg, K. et Griffin, P. (2015). A framework for teachable collaborative problem solving skills. Dans P. Griffin et E. Care (dir.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach. Educational assessment in an information age (p. 37–56). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9395-7_2
Hurme, T.-r. et Järvelä, S. (2005). Students’ activity in computer-supported collaborative problem solving in mathematics. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 10(1), 49–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-005-4579-3
Jaccoud, M. et Mayer, R. (1997). L’observation en situation et la recherche qualitative. Dans J. Poupart, L.-H. Groulx, J.-P. Deslauriers, A. Laperrière, R. Mayer et A. P. Pires (dir.), La recherche qualitative : enjeux épistémologiques et méthodologiques (p. 85–109). Gaëtan Morin.
Jonassen, D. H. (2014). Assessing problem solving. Dans J. M. Spector, D. M. Merrill, J. Elen et M. J. Bishop (dir.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4e éd., p. 269–288). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_22
Kamga, R., Romero, M., Komis, V. et Misirli, A. (2017, 18-19 mai). Identification des difficultés des futur(e)s enseignant(e)s du primaire et du préscolaire en lien avec la compétence de résolution collaborative de problèmes (RCP) [Communication]. 5e sommet du iPad et du numérique en éducation, Montréal, Canada.
Karsenti, T. et Demers, S. (2018). L’étude de cas. Dans T. Karsenti et L. Savoie-Zajc (dir.), La recherche en éducation : étapes et approches (4e éd., p. 289–316). Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal.
Karsenti, T., Parent, S., Kerbrat, N. et Bugmann, J. (2019). Le robot NAO en éducation. Deviens un maître NAO (2e éd.). CRIFPE.
Komis, V. et Misirli, A. (2013, 28–30 octobre). Étude des processus de construction d’algorithmes et de programmes par les petits enfants à l’aide de jouets programmables [Communication]. Colloque international DIDAPRO 5, Clermont-Ferrand, France. https://edutice.archives-ouvertes.fr/edutice-00875628/
Lai, A.-F. et Yang, S.-M. (2011, 16–18 septembre). The learning effect of visualized programming learning on 6th graders’ problem solving and logical reasoning abilities [Communication]. International conference on electrical and control engineering, Yichang, Chine. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECENG.2011.6056908
Lave, J. et Wenger, É. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Leontiev, A. (1978). Activity and consciousness. Prentice-Hall.
Lopez, J. (1986). Des algorithmes aux langages : basic, LSE, logo. Hachette.
Lu, J. J. et Fletcher, G. H. L. (2009). Thinking about computational thinking. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 41(1), 260–264. https://doi.org/10.1145/1539024.1508959
Merrill, M. D. et Gilbert, C. G. (2008). Effective peer interaction in a problem‐centered instructional strategy. Distance Education, 29(2), 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910802154996
Miles, M. B. et Huberman, A. M. (2003). Analyse des données qualitatives (2e éd.). De Boeck Supérieur.
Ministère de l’Éducation de l’Ontario [MEO]. (2016). Définir les compétences du 21e siècle pour l’Ontario. Compétences du 21e siècle. Document de réflexion. https://pedagogienumeriqueenaction.cforp.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Definir-les-competences-du-21e-siecle-pour-l_Ontario-Document-de-reflexion-phase-1-2016.pdf
Ministère de l’Éducation du Québec [MEQ]. (2020). L’usage pédagogique de la programmation informatique. http://www.education.gouv.qc.ca/fileadmin/site_web/documents/ministere/Usage-pedagogique-programmation-informatique.pdf
Ministère de l’Éducation et de l’Enseignement supérieur [MEES]. (2006). Programme de formation de l’école québécoise - Éducation préscolaire et enseignement primaire. http://www.education.gouv.qc.ca/fileadmin/site_web/documents/education/jeunes/pfeq/PFEQ_competences-transversales-primaire.pdf
Ministère de l’Éducation et de l’Enseignement supérieur [MEES]. (2018). Plan d’action numérique en éducation et en enseignement supérieur. http://www.education.gouv.qc.ca/fileadmin/site_web/documents/ministere/PAN_Plan_action_VF.pdf
Neubert, J. C., Mainert, J., Kretzschmar, A. et Greiff, S. (2015). The assessment of 21st century skills in industrial and organizational psychology: Complex and collaborative problem solving. Industrial Organizational Psychology, 8(2), 238–268. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2015.14
Organisation de coopération et de développement économiques [OCDE]. (2015). Résultats du PISA 2012. Trouver des solutions créatives (Volume V) : compétences des élèves en résolution de problèmes de la vie réelle. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264215771-fr
Organisation de coopération et de développement économiques [OCDE]. (2017, juillet). PISA 2015. Collaborative problem solving framework. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/Draft%20PISA%202015%20Collaborative%20Problem%20Solving%20Framework%20.pdf
Parent, S. (2021). La programmation informatique à l’école primaire : pratiques effectives de programmation et mobilisation d’habiletés de résolution collaborative de problèmes (RCP) [Thèse de doctorat, Université de Montréal]. Papyrus. http://hdl.handle.net/1866/25874
Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical methods (2e éd.). Princeton University Press.
QSR International. (2020). NVivo 12 (version 12.6.0) [logiciel]. QSR International.
Romero, M. (2017). Les compétences pour le XXIe siècle. Dans M. Romero, B. Lille et A. Patiño (dir.), Usages créatifs du numérique pour l’apprentissage au XXIe siècle. Presses de l’Université du Québec.
Rosen, Y. et Foltz, P. W. (2014). Assessing collaborative problem solving through automated technologies. Research & Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 9(3), 389–410. https://meyda.education.gov.il/files/Scientist/RosenFoltz2014.pdf
Roy, N. et Garon, R. (2013). Étude comparative des logiciels d’aide à l’analyse de données qualitatives : de l’approche automatique à l’approche manuelle. Recherches qualitatives, 32(1), 154–180. https://doi.org/10.7202/1084616ar
Savoie-Zajc, L. (2018). La recherche qualitative/interprétative. Dans T. Karsenti et L. Savoie-Zajc (dir.), La recherche en éducation : étapes et approches (4e éd., p. 191–217). Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal.
Stadler, M., Herborn, K., Mustafić, M. et Greiff, S. (2020). The assessment of collaborative problem solving in PISA 2015: An investigation of the validity of the PISA 2015 CPS tasks. Computers & Education, 157, article 103964. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103964
Strayer, F. F. et Gauthier, R. (1982). L’approche éthologique de l’observation du comportement. Apprentissage et socialisation, 5(1), 12–23.
Taggar, S. et Brown, T. (2001). Problem-solving team behaviors: Development and validation of BOS and a hierarchical factor structure. Small Group Research, 32(6), 698–726. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F104649640103200602
Tausczik, Y. R., Kittur, A. et Kraut, R. E. (2014, 15–19 février). Collaborative problem solving: A study of MathOverflow. Dans CSCW’14: Proceeding of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing, Baltimore, États-Unis (p. 355–367). https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531690
van der Maren, J.-M. (2004). Méthodes de recherche pour l’éducation (2e éd.). Presses de l’Université de Montréal.
Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Good, J., Mishra, P. et Yadav, A. (2015). Computational thinking in compulsory education: Towards an agenda for research and practice. Education and Information Technologies, 20(4), 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9412-6
Vygotsky, L. S. (1934). Thought and language. M.I.T. Press.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S. et Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
Yin, K. Y. et Abdullah, A. G. K. (2013). The collaborative problem solving questionnaire: Validity and reliability test. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 3(1), 470–478. https://hrmars.com/papers_submitted/9443/the-collaborative-problem-solving-questionnaire-validity-and-reliability-test.pdf
Zehner, F., Weis, M., Vogel, F., Leutner, D. et Reiss, K. (2019). Kollaboratives Problemlösen in PISA 2015: Deutschland im Fokus [Collaborative problem solving in PISA 2015: Focusing on Germany]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 22(3), 617–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-019-00874-4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Canadian Society for the Study of Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Canadian Journal of Education follows Creative Commons Licencing CC BY-NC-ND.
