Credibility and Independence of Evaluation in UNDP: A Response to David Lempert

Main Article Content

Juha I. Uitto

Abstract

The paper contains a response to the article by David Lempert on 'Why Government and Non-governmental Policies and Projects Fail Despite Evaluation' (JMDE, Vol. 6, No. 13, 2010). The paper focuses on the role of the evaluation function in public organizations, using the example of the United Nations Development Programme. It makes broader observations regarding the independence and credibility of evaluation. Finally, the role of evaluation in oversight is discussed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Uitto, J. I. (2010). Credibility and Independence of Evaluation in UNDP: A Response to David Lempert. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 6(14), 153–158. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v6i14.285
Section
Comments

References

Gariba, S., Balogun, P. & Thanh An, P.T. with Hildenwall, V. (2010). Independent review of UNDP evaluation policy. New York: UNDP.

EO. (2008). Evaluation of the role and contribution of UNDP in environment and energy. New York: UNDP Evaluation Office.

EO. (2010). Annual report on evaluation in UNDP 2009. United Nations DP/2010/19.

Lempert, D. H. (2010). Why government and non-governmental policies and projects fail despite ‘evaluations’: An indicator to measure whether evaluation systems incorporate the rules of good governance. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 6(13), 58-108. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v6i13.243

UNDP. (2006). The evaluation policy of UNDP. United Nations DP/2005/28.

UNDP. (2009). Handbook on planning, monitoring and evaluation for development results. New York: United Nations Development Programme.

UNEG. (2006). Norms for evaluation in the United Nations system. United Nations Evaluation Group.