Nonmarket Economic Valuation and "The Economist’s Fallacy"

Main Article Content

Murray A Rudd

Abstract

It is important that noneconomists understand and consider three key points regarding the use of economic cost-benefit analysis. First, economists undertaking applied cost-benefit analyses use expected values by necessity in forward-looking models. Second, economists tally changes in economic value, comparing “with” and “without” investment scenarios, using producer and consumer surplus. Third, marginal changes in the “nonmarket” components of consumer surplus can, and should, be quantified in monetary terms and included in evaluations whenever possible. These three factors highlight the need for multidisciplinary research on complex problems relating public investments to the social, cultural, health, and environmental impacts of those investments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rudd, M. A. (2009). Nonmarket Economic Valuation and "The Economist’s Fallacy". Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 6(11), 112–115. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v6i11.221
Section
Comments

References

Scriven, M. (2008). The economist's fallacy. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 5(9), 74-76.

https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v5i9.184

Anderson, C., Adamowicz, W., Jacobs, P., Ohinmaa, A., Dick, B., & Rashiq, S. (in press). The willingness to pay for reducing pain and pain-related disability. Value in Health.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00457.x