Adapting the Utilization-Focused Approach for Teacher Evaluation
Main Article Content
Abstract
Mandated teacher evaluations are of little use to educators for a variety of reasons, including lack of reliability and validity of evaluation instruments and methods, failure of evaluation systems to adhere to the Personnel Evaluation Standards (Joint Committee, 2008), and the inherent bias in using classroom observations as a method of evaluating teachers. As a result, teacher evaluations fail to improve teaching or impact student learning. This paper suggests that the utility, and ultimately the impact, of teacher evaluations can be improved by adapting the utilization-focused approach to teacher evaluations. Specific suggestions for implementing the Utilization-focused Evaluation Checklist (Patton, 2008) are also provided.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Permissions
Authors retain full copyright for articles published in JMDE. JMDE publishes under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY - NC 4.0). Users are allowed to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original authors and source are credited accurately and appropriately. Only the original authors may distribute the article for commercial or compensatory purposes. To view a copy of this license, visit creativecommons.org
References
Bitner, T., & Kratzner, R. (1995, October). A primer on building teacher evaluation instruments. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwest Educational Research Assocation, Chicago, IL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED394953)
Brant, C., Mathers, C., Oliva, M., Brown-Sims, M., & Hess, J. (2007). Examining district guidance to schools on teacher evaluation policies in the midwest region: Issues and answers (REL 2007-No. 030). Retrieved January 12, 2008, from http://www.learningpt.org/
Calabrese, R. L., Sherwood, K., Fast, J., & Womack, C. (2004). Teachers' and principals' perceptions of the summative evaluation conference. International Journal of Educational Management, 18(2), 109-117.
https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540410522243
Colby, S. A., Bradshaw, L. K, & Joyner, R. L. (2002, April). Perceptions of teacher evaluation systems and their impact on school improvement, professional development, and student learning. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED464916)
Cousins, J. B. (1995). Using collaborative performance appraisal to enhance professional growth: A review and test of what we know. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 9(3), 199-222.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00972638
Darling-Hammond, L., Wise, A. E., & Pease, S. R. (1983). Teacher evaluation in the organization context: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 53(3), 285-328.
https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543053003285
Flesher, J., Sommers, C., & Brauchle, P. (2000). Enhancing instructor evaluation. Performance Improvement, 39(8), 26-29.
https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4140390810
Frase, L.E., & Streshly, W. (1994). Lack of accuracy, feedback, and commitment in teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1, 47-57.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00972709
Jacob, B., & Lefgren, L. (2006). When principals rate teachers: The best and the worst stand out. Education Next, 6(2), 59-64.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (2008). The personnel evaluation standards (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Jorgenson, O., & Peal, C. (2008). When principals lose touch with the classroom. Principal, 87(4), 52-55.
Kyriakides, L. (2005). Drawing from teacher effectiveness research and research into teacher interpersonal behavior to establish a teacher evaluation system. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 40(2), 44-66.
Loup, K. S., & Ellett, C. D. (1997). Application of the Personnel Evaluation Standards to local district teacher evaluation programs. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED412224)
Mathers, C., Oliva, M., & Laine, S. W. M. (2008). Improving instruction through effective teacher evaluation: Options for states and districts. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Peterson, K. D. (2000). Teacher Evaluation: A comprehensive guide to new directions and practices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Shinkfield, A. J., & Stufflebeam, D. L. (1995). Teacher evaluation: Guide to effective practice. Boston: Kluwer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1796-5
Stiggins, R. J. (1986). Teacher evaluation: Accountability and growth systems- Different purposes. NASSP Bulletin, 70, 51- 58.
https://doi.org/10.1177/019263658607049015
Stiggins, R. J., & Bridgeford, N. J. (1985). Performance assessment for teacher development. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 7(1), 85-97.
https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737007001085
Toroff, B., & Sessions, D. N. (2005). Principals' perceptions of the cases of teacher ineffectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(4), 530-537.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.4.530
Zimmerman, S., & Deckert-Pelton, M. (2003). Evaluating the evaluators: Teachers' perceptions of the principal's role in professional evaluation. NASSSP Bulletin, 87(63), 28-37.