Feminist Evaluation and Gender Approaches: There's a Difference?

Main Article Content

Donna R. Podems

Abstract

Background: Feminist evaluation and gender approaches offer evaluators distinct ways of thinking and applying evaluations. A Namibian case narrative demonstrates how feminist evaluation and gender approaches, among others, resulted in a useful and used evaluation.  Purpose: The purpose of this article is to provide readers with a historical overview and description of feminist evaluation and gender approaches and is intended for those who are interested in understanding these approaches to evaluation. Setting: Southern Africa. Intervention: A nonprofit that advocates for sex workers safety and the decriminalization of sex work. Research Design: A comparative framework is used to describe feminist evaluation and gender approaches. The evaluation employs qualitative methods that explored the reality of sex work and sex workers through both semi-structured and exploratory questionnaires. The approach was guided by feminist evaluation, gender approaches, and to a lesser extent drew on several other evaluation approaches. Data Collection and Analysis:  Interviews and document reviews were used to collect data and content and thematic analyses were used to analyze data. Findings: Feminist evaluation and gender approaches should be viewed as distinct approaches. Their use should be of interest both to evaluation scholars and to those who design, implement and/or use evaluations. Keywords: feminist evaluation, gender, gender approaches, international development, program evaluation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
PODEMS, Donna R.. Feminist Evaluation and Gender Approaches: There's a Difference?. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, [S.l.], v. 6, n. 14, p. 1-17, feb. 2010. ISSN 1556-8180. Available at: <https://journals.sfu.ca/jmde/index.php/jmde_1/article/view/199>. Date accessed: 19 oct. 2020.
Section
Articles