Main Article Content
Previous findings on the preconditions of teachers’ collaboration are inconsistent. This might be related to the research methods used to assess the teachers’ collaborative practice. Retrospective assessments by self-report on a relatively general level prevail. The validity of these self-reports is limited, however. In contrast, time-sampling methods have the potential to investigate collaborative practice specifically and longitudinally as a day-to-day process over time validly. But to date, no research on collaborative activities in schools based on time-sampling methods is available. In this study, we extended the current state of research by analysing the variability and preconditions of teachers’ collaboration at four secondary schools over three weeks based on time-sampling data collected by a newly developed online practice log. Recorded were collaborative activities outside of teaching with a focus on administrative and organisational tasks and on school subject-specific tasks. The results revealed that teachers’ collaborative activities varied significantly between weekdays, showing a linear decrease from Monday to Friday, regardless of the content of collaboration. Collaboration that focused on administrative-organisational tasks seemed to be quite stable over the weeks and was hardly influenced by teachers’ individual characteristics. Instead, collaborative activities that focused on school subject-specific tasks varied significantly between weeks; moreover, they were influenced by teachers’ leadership role and gender. The results indicate that rather stable routinised patterns of day-to-day collaboration over the weeks decrease the influence of teachers’ individual characteristics. Hence, by collecting data that is closer to content-specific day-to-day collaborative activities, time-sampling methods can be seen as a driver for new insights.
FLR adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Creative Common License (BY-NC-ND). That is, Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors with, however, first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.
Adams, E. L., Carrier, S. J., Minotue, J., Porter, S. R., McEachin, A., Walkowiak, T. A., & Zulli, R. A. (2017). The development and validation of the instructional practices log in science: A measure of K-5 science instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 39(3), 335-357. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1282183
Antoniou, P., Kyriakides, L., & Creemers, B. P. M. (2015). The Dynamic Integrated Approach to teacher professional development: Rationale and main characteristics. Teacher Development, 19(4), 535-552. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2015.1079550
Best, H., & Wolf, C. (2012). Modellvergleich und Ergebnisinterpretation in Logit-und Probit-Regressionen. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 64(2), 377-395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-012-0167-4
Bryant, D. A., Lun, Y., & Adams, A. (2020). How middle leaders support in-service teachers’ on-site professional learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 100(101530). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.101530
Bryk, A. S., Bender Sebring, P., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., & Easton, J. Q. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement. Lessons from Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
Camburn, E. M., Spillane, J. P., & Sebastian, J. (2010). Assessing the utility of a daily log for measuring principal leadership practice. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 707-737. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X10377345
Camburn, E. M., & Won Han, S. (2017). Teachers’ professional learning experiences and their engagement in reflective practice: A replication study. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 28(4), 527-554. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2017.1302968
Creemers, B. P. M., & Kyriakides, L. (2008). The dynamics of educational effectiveness. A contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools. Routledge.
Decuyper, S., Dochy, F., & Van den Bossche, P. (2010). Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning: An integrative model for effective team learning in organisations. Educational Research Review, 5, 111-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.02.002
Elliott, S. N., Roach, A., T., & Kurz, A. (2014). Evaluating and advancing the effective teaching of special educators with a dynamic instructional practices portfolio. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 39(2), 83-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508413511491
Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 94-118. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556620
Geeraerts, K., Tynjälä, P., & Heikkinen, H. L. T. (2018). Inter-generational learning of teachers: What and how do teachers learn from older and younger colleagues? European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(4), 479-495. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2018.1448781
Glennie, E. J., Charles, K. J., & Rice, O. N. (2017). Teacher logs: A tool for gaining a comprehensive understanding of classroom practices. Science Educator, 25(2), 88-96.
Goddard, Y. L., & Goddard, R. D. (2007). A theoretical and empirical investigation of teacher collaboration for school improvement and student achievement in public elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 109(4), 877-896. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810710900401
Gräsel, C., Fussangel, K., & Parchmann, I. (2006). Lerngemeinschaft in der Lehrerfortbildung. Kooperationserfahrungen und -überzeugungen von Lehrkräften. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 9(4), 545-561. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:4453
Gutierez, S. B. (2015). Teachers’ reflective practice in lesson study: A tool for improving instructional practice. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 63(3), 314-328. https://doi.org/10.11575/ajer.v61i3.56087
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2011). Exploring the journey of school improvement: Classifying and analyzing patterns of change in school improvement processes and learning outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2010.536322
Hargreaves, A. (2019). Teacher collaboration: 30 years of research on its nature, forms, limitations and effects. Teacher and Teaching, 25(5), 603-621. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2019.1639499
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital. Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.
Havnes, A. (2009). Talk, planning and decision‐making in interdisciplinary teacher teams: A case study. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(1), 155-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600802661360
James, C. R., Dunning, G., Connolly, M., & Elliott, T. (2007). Collaborative practice: A model of successful working in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 45(5), 541-555. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230710778187
Kramer, R.-T. (2014). Kulturelle Passung und Schülerhabitus. Zur Bedeutung der Schule für Transformationsprozesse des Habitus. In W. Helsper & R.-T. Kramer (Eds.), Schülerhabitus (pp. 183-202). Springer VS.
Kurz, A., Elliott, S. N., Kettler, R. J., & Yel, N. (2014). Assessing students' opportunity to learn the intended curriculum using an online teacher log: Initial validity evidence. Educational Assessment, 19(3), 159-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2014.934606
Kyndt, E., Gijbels, D., Grosemans, I., & Donche, V. (2016). Teachers’ everyday professional development: Mapping informal learning activities, antecedents, and learning outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1111-1150. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627864
Lecat, A., Spaltman, Y., Beausaert, S., Raemdonck, I., & Kyndt, E. (2020). Two decennia of research on teachers’ informal learning: A literature review on definitions and measures. Educational Research Review, 30, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100324
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
Lomos, C., Hofman, R. H., & Bosker, R. J. (2011). The relationship between departments as professional communities and student achievement in secondary schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 722–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.12.003
Maag Merki, K., Grob, U., Rechsteiner, B., Wullschleger, A., Schori, N., & Rickenbacher, A. (2021). Regulation activities of teachers in secondary schools: Development of a theoretical framework and exploratory analyses in four secondary schools based on time sampling data. In A. Oude Groote Beverborg, T. Feldhoff, K. Maag Merki, & F. Radisch (Eds.), Concept and design developments in school improvement research. Longitudinal, multilevel and mixed methods and their relevance for educational accountability (pp. 257-301). Springer International Publishing. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-69345-9
Mitchell, C., & Sackney, L. (2011). Profound improvement: Building learning-community capacity on living-system principles. Routledge.
Moeller, J., Viljaranta, J., Kracke, B., & Dietrich, J. (2020). Disentangling objective characteristics of learning situations from subjective perceptions thereof, using an experience sampling method design. Frontline Learning Research, 8(3), 63-84. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v8i3
Moolenaar, N. M., Daly, A. J., Cornelissen, F., Liou, Y.-H., Caillier, S., Riordan, R., Wilson, K., & Cohen, N. A. (2014). Linked to innovation: Shaping an innovative climate through network intentionality and educators' social network position. Journal of Educational Change, 15(2), 99-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-014-9230-4
Moolenaar, N. M., Daly, A. J., Sleegers, P., J., & Karsten, S. (2014). Social forces in school teams. In D. Zandvliet, P. Brok den, T. Mainhard, & J. Van Tartwijk (Eds.), Interpersonal relationships in education: From theory to practice (pp. 159-181). SensePublishers.
Muckenthaler, M., Tillmann, T., Weiss, S., & Kiel, E. (2020). Teacher collaboration as a core objective of school development. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 31(3), 486-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1747501
Muijs, D., Harris, A., Chapman, C., Stoll, L., & Russ, J. (2004). Improving schools in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas: A review of research evidence. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15(2), 149-175. https://doi.org/10.1076/sesi.188.8.131.52433
OECD. (2016). Supporting teacher professionalism: Insights from TALIS 2013. OECD. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264248601-en
Ohly, S., Sonnentag, S., Niessen, C., & Zapf, D. (2010). Diary studies in organizational research: An introduction and some practical recommendations. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9(2), 79-93. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000009
Reis, H. T., & Gable, S. L. (2000). Event-sampling and other methods for studying everyday experience. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 190-222). Cambridge University Press.
Richter, D., & Pant, H. A. (2016). Lehrerkooperation in Deutschland: Eine Studie zu kooperativen Arbeitsbeziehungen bei Lehrkräften der Sekundarstufe I. Bertelsmann Stiftung, Robert Bosch Stiftung, Stiftung Mercator, Deutsche Telekom Stiftung.
Rowan, B., & Correnti, R. (2009). Studying reading instruction with teacher logs: Lessons from the Study of Instructional Improvement. Educational Researcher, 38(2), 120-131. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09332375
Schippers, M. C., Den Hartog, D. N., & Koopman, P. L. (2007). Reflexivity in teams: A measure and correlates. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 56(2), 189-201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2006.00250.x
Sebastian, J., Comburn, E. M., & Spillane, J. P. (2018). Portraits of principal practice: Time allocation and social principal work. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(1), 47-84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X17720978
Sherer, J. Z., & Spillane, J. P. (2011). Constancy and change in work practice in schools: The role of organizational routines. Teachers College Record, 113(3), 611-657. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811111300302
Sleegers, P. J. C., den Broke, P., Verbiest, E., Moolenaar, N. M., & Daly, A. J. (2013). Toward conceptual clarity. A multidimensional, multilevel model of professional learning communities in Dutch elementary schools. The Elementary School Journal, 114(1), 118-137. https://doi.org/10.1086/671063
Spillane, J. P., & Kim, C. M. (2012). An exploratory analysis of formal school leaders' positioning in instructional advice and information networks in elementary schools. American Journal of Education, 119(1), 73-102. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/667755
Spillane, J. P., & Mertz, K. (2015). Distributed leadership. Oxford Bibliographies. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199756810-0123
Spillane, J. P., Shirrell, M., & Adhikari, S. (2018). Constructing “experts” among peers: Educational infrastructure, test data, and teachers’ interactions about teaching. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(4), 586-612. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373718785764
Spillane, J. P., Shirrell, M., & Hopkins, M. (2016). Designing and deploying a professional learning community (PLC) organizational routine: Bureaucratic and collegial arrangements in tandem. Les dossiers des sciences de l’éducation, 35, 97-122. https://doi.org/10.4000/dse.1283
Spillane, J. P., & Zuberi, A. (2009). Designing and piloting a leadership daily practice log: Using logs to study the practice of leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(3), 375-423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08329290
Steinert, B., Hartig, J., & Klieme, E. (2008). Institutionelle Bedingungen sprachlicher Kompetenzen. In DESI-Konsortium (Ed.), Unterricht und Kompetenzerwerb in Deutsch und Englisch: Ergebnisse der DESI-Studie (pp. 411-450). Beltz.
Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7, 221-258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8
Stoll, L., & Louis, K. S. (2007). Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth and dilemmas. Open University Press.
Van Gasse, R. (2019). The effect of formal team meetings on teachers' informal data use. Frontline Learning Research, 7(2), 40-56. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v7i2.443
Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2013). Team entitativity and teacher teams in schools: Towards a typology. Frontline Learning Research, 2, 86-98. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v1i2.23
Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2015). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 15, 17-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.002
Vangrieken, K., & Kyndt, E. (2020). The teacher as an island? A mixed method study on the relationship between autonomy and collaboration. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 35, 177-204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-019-00420-0
Vangrieken, K., Meredith, C., Packer, T., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Teacher communities as a context for professional development: A systematic review. Teacher and Teacher Education, 61, 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.001
Vannest, K. J., & Parker, R. I. (2010). Measuring time: The stability of special education teacher time use. Journal of Special Education, 44(2), 94-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466908329826
Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 80-91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004
Vieluf, S., Kaplan, D., Klieme, E., & Bayer, S. (2012). Teaching practices and pedagogical innovation: Evidence from TALIS. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/23129638
Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391875
Wullschleger, A., Maag Merki, K., Rechsteiner, B., & Rickenbacher, A. (2019). Kooperation von Lehrpersonen im Hinblick auf Schulentwicklung: Forschungsstand und Forschungsperspektiven am Beispiel von sozialen Netzwerkanalysen. In U. Steffens & P. Posch (Eds.), Lehrerprofessionalität und Schulqualität: Grundlagen der Qualität von Schule 4 (pp. 259-286). Waxmann.
Yang, R., Zhang, Z., & Yu, S. (2018). Understanding teacher collaboration processes from a complexity theory perspective: A case study of a Chinese secondary school. Teachers and Teaching, 24(5), 520-537. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2018.1447458
Ziegler, A. (2011). Generalized estimating equations. Springer.
Zirkel, S., Garcia, J. A., & Murphy, M. C. (2015). Experience-sampling research methods and their potential for education research. Educational Researcher, 44(1), 7-16. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14566879