Interpersonal affect in groupwork: A comparative case study of two small groups with contrasting group dynamics outcomes

Main Article Content

Cheryl Jones
Simone Volet
Deborah Pino-Pasternak
Olli-Pekka Heinimäki


Teamwork capabilities are essential for 21st century life, with groupwork emerging as a fruitful context to develop these skills. Case studies that explore interpersonal affect dynamics in authentic higher education groupwork settings can highlight collaborative skills development needs. This comparative case-study traced the sociodynamic evolution of two groups of first-year university students to investigate the high collaborative variance outcomes of the two groups, which reported starkly contrasting group dynamics (negative and dysfunctional or positive and collaborative). Mixed-methods (video-recorded observations of five groupwork labs over one semester, and group interviews) provided interpersonal affect data as real-time visible behaviours, and the felt experiences and perceptions of  participants. The study traced interpersonal affect dynamics in the natural fluctuation of not just task-focused (on-task), but also explicitly relational (off-task) interactions, which revealed their function in both task participation and group dynamics. Findings illustrate visible interpersonal affect behaviours that manifested and evolved over time as interactive patterns, and group dynamics outcomes. Fine-grained analysis of interactions unveiled interpersonal affect as a collective, evolving process, and the mechanism through which one group started and stayed highly positive and collaborative over the semester. The other group showed a tendency towards splitting to undertake tasks early, leading to low group-level interpersonal attentiveness, and over time, subgroups emerged through interactions both off-task and on-task. The study made visible the pervasive nature of interpersonal affect as enacted through seemingly inconsequential everyday behaviours that supported the relational and task-based needs of groupwork, and those behaviours which impeded collaboration.


Article Details

How to Cite
Jones, C., Volet, S., Pino-Pasternak, D., & Heinimäki, O.-P. (2022). Interpersonal affect in groupwork: A comparative case study of two small groups with contrasting group dynamics outcomes. Frontline Learning Research, 10(1), 46–75.
Author Biography

Cheryl Jones, Murdoch University, Australia

PhD candidate


American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Affect. In APA Dictionary of psychology. Retrieved 23 January 2020 from

Baker, M., Andrriessen, J., & Järvelä, S. (Eds.). (2013). Affective learning together: Social and emotional dimensions of collaborative learning, pp. 1-30. Oxon, UK: Routledge.

Bakhtiar, A., Webster, E. A., & Hadwin, A. F. (2018). Regulation and socio-emotional interactions in a positive and a negative group climate. Metacognition and Learning, 13(1), 57-90.

Barkaoui, K., So, M., & Suzuki, W. (2008). Is it relevant? The role of off-task talk in collaborative learning. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 31-54.

Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307-359.

Barsade, S. G. (2002). The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 644–675.

Barsade, S. G., & Knight, A. P. (2015). Group affect. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 21-46. https://doi. org/10.1177/0963721412438352

Bartel, C. A., & Saavedra, R. (2000). The collective construction of work group moods. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2), 197-231.

Braun, M. T., Kozlowski, S. W., Brown, T. A., & DeShon, R. P. (2020). Exploring the dynamic team cohesion–performance and coordination–performance relationships of newly formed teams. Small Group Research, 51(5), 551-580.

Casciaro, T., & Lobo, M. S. (2008). When competence is irrelevant: The role of interpersonal affect in task-related ties. Administrative science quarterly, 53(4), 655-684.

Curşeu, P. L., Chappin, M. M., & Jansen, R. J. (2018). Gender diversity and motivation in collaborative learning groups: The mediating role of group discussion quality. Social Psychology of Education, 21, 289-302. https://doi:10.1007/s11218-017-9419-5

Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg, (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1-19). Elsevier.

Do, S. L., & Schallert, D. L. (2004). Emotions and classroom talk: Toward a model of the role of affect in students’ experiences of classroom discussions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 619-634.

Ferreira, J. M. (2021). What if we look at the body? An embodied perspective of collaborative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1455-1473.

Forsyth, D. R. (2014). Group dynamics (6th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

García, A., Olivares, H., Simão, L. M., & Dominguez, A. L. (2020). Socioemotional interactions in collaborative learning: An analysis from the perspective of semiotic cultural psychology. Culture & Psychology, 1-19.

Gorse, C. A., & Emmitt, S. (2009). Informal interaction in construction progress meetings. Construction Management and Economics, 27(10), 983-993.

Hallgren, K. A. (2012). Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 23-34.

Hess, U., & Hareli, S. (2019). The emotion-based inferences in context (EBIC) model. In U. Hess & S. Hareli (Eds.), The social nature of emotion expression: What emotions can tell us about the world (pp. 1-5). Springer.

Huber, M. (2020). Video-based content analysis. In M. Huber & D. E. Froehlich (Eds.), Analyzing group interactions: A guidebook for qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods (pp. 37–48). Routledge.

Isohätälä, J., Näykki, P., & Järvelä, S. (2019). Cognitive and socio-emotional interaction in collaborative learning: Exploring fluctuations in students’ participation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(6), 831-851.

Isohätälä, J., Näykki, P., Järvelä, S., & Baker, M. J. (2018). Striking a balance: Socio-emotional processes during argumentation in collaborative learning interaction. Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction, 16, 1-19.

Järvenoja, H., Järvelä, S., & Malmberg, J. (2017). Supporting groups’ emotion and motivation regulation during collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 70, 101090

Järvenoja, H., Näykki, P., & Törmänen, T. (2019). Emotional regulation in collaborative learning: When do higher education students activate group level regulation in the face of challenges? Studies in Higher Education, 44(10), 1747–1757.

Jones, C., Volet, S., & Pino-Pasternak, D. (2021). Observational research in face-to-face small groupwork: Capturing affect as socio-dynamic interpersonal phenomena. Small Group Research, 52(3), 341-376.

Kauffeld, S., & Lehmann-Willenbrock, N. (2012). Meetings matter: Effects of team meetings on team and organizational success. Small Group Research, 43(2), 128-156.

Knight, A. P., & Eisenkraft, N. (2015). Positive is usually good, negative is not always bad: The effects of group affect on social integration and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4), 1214–1227.

Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335-353. https://doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00057-2

Kuppens, P. (2015). It’s About Time: A special section on affect dynamics. Emotion Review, 7(4), 297-300.

Kuppens, P., Tuerlinckx, F., Yik, M., Koval, P., Coosemans, J., Zeng, K. J., & Russell, J. A. (2017). The relation between valence and arousal in subjective experience varies with personality and culture. Journal of Personality 85(4), 530-542.

Kwon, K., Liu, Y-H., & Johnson, L. P. (2014). Group regulation and social-emotional interactions observed in computer supported collaborative learning: Comparison between good vs. poor collaborators. Computers & Education, 78, 185-200.

Langer-Osuna, J. M., Gargroetzi, E., Munson, J., & Chavez, R. (2020). Exploring the role of off-task activity on students’ collaborative dynamics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(3), 514-532.

Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Allen, J. A., & Meinecke, A. L. (2014). Observing culture: Differences in U.S.-American and German team meeting behaviors. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations,17(2) 252-271.

Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., & Chiu, M. M. (2018). Igniting and resolving content disagreements during team interactions: A statistical discourse analysis of team dynamics at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(9), 1142-1162.

Lobczowski, N. G., Lyons, K., Greene, J. A., & McLaughlin, J. E. (2021). Socioemotional regulation strategies in a project-based learning environment. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 65, 101968.

Mesquita, B., & Boiger, M. (2014). Emotions in context: A Sociodynamic model of emotions. Emotion Review, 6(4), 298-302.

Mills, A. J., Durepos, G., & Wiebe, E. (Eds.). (2012). Comparative case study. In Encyclopedia of case study research (pp. 175-176). Sage Publications.

Näykki, P., Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P. A., & Järvenoja, H. (2014). Socio-emotional conflict in collaborative learning: A process-oriented case study in a higher education context. International Journal of Educational Research, 68, 1-14.

Oțoiu, C., Rațiu, L., & Rus, C. L. (2019). Rivals when we work together: Team rivalry effects on performance in collaborative learning groups. Administrative Sciences, 9(3), 61.

Poupore, G. (2018). A complex systems investigation of group work dynamics in L2 interactive tasks. The Modern Language Journal, 102(2), 350-370.

Riebe, L., Girardi, A., & Whitsed, C. (2016). A systematic literature review of teamwork pedagogy in higher education. Small Group Research, 47(2), 619-664.

Rogat, T. K., and Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2011). Socially shared regulation in collaborative groups: An analysis of the interplay between quality of social regulation and group processes. Cognition and Instruction, 29(4), 375-415.

Rogat, T. K., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2013). Understanding the quality variation of socially shared regulation: A focus on methodology. In M. Vauras & S. Volet (Eds.), Interpersonal regulation of learning and motivation: Methodological advances (pp. 102-125). Routledge.

Scherer, K. R. (2005). What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Social Science Information, 44(4), 695-729.

Sherin, M. G. (2004). New perspectives on the role of video in teacher education. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Vol. 10. Using video in teacher education (pp. 1–27). Elsevier.

Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2009). Animation: The fundamental, essential, and properly descriptive concept. Continental Philosophy Review, 42 (3), 375-400.

Slaby, J. (2016). Relational affect. Working paper SFB 1171 Affective societies 02/16.

Sohr, E. R., Gupta A., & Elby, A. (2018). Taking an escape hatch: Managing tension in group discourse. Science Education, 102(5), 883-916.

Summers, M., & Volet, S. (2010). Group work does not necessarily equal collaborative learning: Evidence from observations and self-reports. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 25(4), 473–492.

Ucan, S., & Webb, M. (2015). Social regulation of learning during collaborative inquiry learning in science: How does it emerge and what are its functions? International Journal of Science Education, 37(15), 2503-2532.

Ujitani E, & Volet, S. Socio-emotional challenges in international education: Insight into reciprocal understanding and intercultural relational development. Journal of Research in International Education, 7(3), 279-303.

Van Kleef, G. A. (2021). Comment: moving (further) beyond private experience: on the radicalization of the social approach to emotions and the emancipation of verbal emotional expressions. Emotion Review, 13(2), 90-94.

Vriesema, C. C., & McCaslin, M. (2020). Experience and meaning in small-group contexts: Fusing observational and self-report data to capture self and other dynamics. Frontline Learning Research, 8(3), 126-139.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Yin. R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications Inc.

Yoerger, M., Allen. J. A., & Crowe. J. (2018). The impact of premeeting talk on group performance. Small Group Research, 49(2) 226-258.