Unfolding perspectives on networked professional learning: Exploring ties and time
Main Article Content
Abstract
Networked learning and learning networks are commonplace concepts in most contemporary discourse on learning in the 21st century. This special issue provides a collection of studies that address the need for a growing body of empirical work to extent the limited understanding of the use and benefits of networks in relation to learning and professional development. In this article we attempt to offer a synthesis of the studies presented in this special issue and reflect on their findings. The studies in this issue present a rich combination of networked professional learning research addressing issues related to the composition and structure of learning networks, their content and activities, showing how multi-faceted research in the field of networked learning really is. Based on the findings and methods used in the articles in this issue, we articulate some recommendations for further research. The recommendations are focused on the need for advanced multi-level analysis to understand the complexity of learning ties, the need for employing a multi-method research approach to triangulate and contextualize findings, the need to conduct process and time-based analysis and finally the need to further develop a theory and toolkit for applying Social Network Analysis in the context of networked learning.
Article Details
FLR adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Creative Common License (BY-NC-ND). That is, Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors with, however, first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.
References
Boud, D., & Hager, P. (2012). Re-thinking continuing professional development through changing metaphors and location in professional practice. Studies in Continuing Education, 34(1), 17-30. DOI: 10.1080/0158037X.2011.608656
Cross, R. L., & Parker, A. (2004). The hidden power of social networks: Understanding how work really gets done in organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
De Laat, M., & Lally, V. (2003). Complexity, theory, and praxis: Researching collaborative learning and tutoring processes in a networked learning community. Instructional Science, 31(1-2), 7-39. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022596100142
De Laat, M. F., Schreurs, B., & Nijland, F. (2014). Communities of practice and value creation in networks. In. R. F. Poell, T. Rocco & G. Roth (Eds.), The Routledge companion to human resource development (pp. 249-257). New York: Routledge.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: The Macmillan Company.
Duguid, P. (2005). The art of knowing: Social and tacit dimensions of knowledge and the limits of the community of practice. The Information Society, 21(2), 109-118. DOI: 10.1080/01972240590925311
Eberle, J., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2014). Legitimate peripheral participation in communities of practice: Participation support structures in for newcomers in faculty student councils. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(2), 216-244. DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2014.883978
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
Goodyear, P., Banks, S., Hodgson, V., & McConnell, D. (Eds.) (2004) Advances in research on networked learning. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2776392
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. New York: Teachers College Press.
Haythornthwaite, C., & De Laat, M. F. (2012). Social network informed design for learning with educational technology. In A. Olofson & O. Lindberg (Eds.). Informed design of educational technologies in higher education: Enhanced learning and teaching (pp. 352-374). Hershey, PA: IGI-Global.
Hodgson, V., De Laat, M. F., McConnell, D., & Ryberg, T. (2014). Researching design, experience and practice of networked learning: An overview. In V. Hodgson, M. F. De Laat, D. McConnell & T. Ryberg (Eds.). The design, experience and practice of networked learning (pp. 1-26). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer
Hodgson, V., McConnell, D., & Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L. (2012). The theory, practice and pedagogy of networked learning. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, V. Hodgson & D. McConnell (Eds.), Exploring the theory, pedagogy and practice of networked learning (pp. 291-305). New York: Springer.
Illich, I. (1971). Deschooling society. Manchester, UK: Pelican Books.
Kessels, J. W. M. (2012). Leiderschapspraktijken in een professionele ruimte [Leadership practice in a professional space]. Heerlen, the Netherlands: Ruud de Moor Centrum, Open University of the Netherlands.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: University Press.
Mead, G. (1934). Mind, self & society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Price, D. (2013). Open: How we’ll work, live and learn in the future [eBook, Kindle Edition]. Crux Publishing.
Pugh, K., & Prusak, L. (2013). Designing effective knowledge networks. Retrieved October 24, 2013, from http://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/designing-effective-knowledge-networks
Reimann, P. (2009). Time is precious: Variable- and event-centered approaches to process analysis in CSCL research. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(3), 239-257. DOI: 10.1007/s11412-009-9070-z
Roxå, T., & Mårtensson, K. (2009). Significant conversations and significant networks: Exploring the backstage of the teaching arena. Studies in Higher Education, 34(5), 547-559. DOI: 10.1080/03075070802597200
Schümmer, T., Strijbos, J. W., & Berkel, T. (2005). Measuring group interaction during CSCL. In T. Koschmann, D. Suthers & T. W. Chan (Eds.), Computer supported collaborative learning 2005: The next 10 years! (pp. 567-576). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X027002004
Steeples, C., & Jones, C. (2002). Networked learning: Perspectives and issues. London: Springer.
Suthers, D., Dwyer, N., Medina, R., & Vatrapu, R. (2010). A framework for conceptualizing, representing, and analyzing distributed interaction. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(1), 5-42. DOI: 10.1007/s11412-009-9081-9
Weinberger, D. (2011). Too big to know: Rethinking knowledge now that the facts aren’t the facts, experts are everywhere, and the smartest person in the room in the room. New York: Basic Books.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E., Trayner, B., & De Laat, M. (2011). Telling stories about the value of communities and networks: A toolkit. Heerlen, the Netherlands: Ruud de Moor Centrum, Open University of the Netherlands.
Wellman, B. (2002). Little Boxes, Glocalization, and Networked Individualism. In M. Tanabe, P. van den Besselaar & T. Ishida (Eds.), Digital cities II: Computational and sociological approaches (pp. 10-25). Berlin: Springer.