What do students think about differentiation and within-class achievement grouping?

Main Article Content

Emilie Prast
Kim Stroet
Arnout Koornneef
Tom F. Wilderjans


Differentiation and achievement grouping are frequently implemented practices to adapt education to students’ varying educational needs based on achievement level. Potential didactical and socioemotional advantages and disadvantages of these practices have been discussed in the literature. However, little is known about the perspective of students themselves. This study examined how students (N = 428) perceived differentiation and within-class homogeneous achievement grouping in primary mathematics education, with attention for potential differences between students of diverse achievement levels. Students of Grades 1, 3 and 5 completed a questionnaire about various differentiated mathematics activities and (if applicable) within-class achievement grouping. In line with the didactical perspective on differentiation, extended instruction and less difficult tasks were appreciated most by low-achieving students whereas more difficult tasks were appreciated most by high-achieving students. Students of all achievement groups had largely positive attitudes about achievement grouping and about their own achievement group. However, some differences between achievement groups were found, with less favourable results for students placed in low achievement groups. Students’ responses to open-ended questions provided additional insights into the reasons behind students’ evaluations of differentiation and achievement grouping. Differences between grade levels were also explored.

Article Details

How to Cite
Prast, E., Stroet, K., Koornneef, A., & Wilderjans, T. (2023). What do students think about differentiation and within-class achievement grouping?. Frontline Learning Research, 11(1), 57–93. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v11i1.1079


Arroyo, I., Woolf, B. P., Burelson, W., Muldner, K., Rai, D., & Tai, M. (2014). A multimedia adaptive tutoring system for mathematics that addresses cognition, metacognition and affect. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(4), 387–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0023-y

Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.

Blok, H. (2004). Adaptief onderwijs: betekenis en effectiviteit [Adaptive education: meaning and effectivity]. Pedagogische Studiën, 81(1), 5–27.

Boaler, J., Wiliam, D., & Brown, M. (2000). Students’ experiences of ability grouping - Disaffection, polarisation and the construction of failure. British Educational Research Journal, 26(5), 631–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/713651583

Campbell, T. (2021). In-class ‘ability’-grouping, teacher judgements and children’s mathematics self-concept: evidence from primary-aged girls and boys in the UK Millennium Cohort Study. Cambridge Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2021.1877619

Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: a handbook for research on interactions. Irvington.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. Harper Perennial.

Deunk, M. I., Smale-Jacobse, A. E., de Boer, H., Doolaard, S., & Bosker, R. J. (2018). Effective differentiation Practices:A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the cognitive effects of differentiation practices in primary education. Educational Research Review, 24, 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.02.002

Eder, D. (1983). Ability Grouping and Students’ Academic Self-Concepts: A Case Study. The Elementary School Journal, 84, 149–161. https://doi.org/10.2307/1001307

Education Endowment Foundation. (2018). Sutton Trust-Education Endowment Foundation Teaching and Learning Toolkit. Education Endowment Foundation. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/resources/teaching-learning-toolkit

Expertgroep doorlopende leerlijnen. (2008). Over de drempels met rekenen: Consolideren, onderhouden, gebruiken en verdiepen. Expertgroep doorlopende leerlijnen.

Faber, J. M., & Visscher, A. J. (2016). De effecten van Snappet: Effecten van een adaptief onderwijsplatform op leerresultaten en motivatie van leerlingen. [The effects of Snappet: Effects of an adaptive educational platform on student achievement and motivation]. Universiteit Twente.

Francis, B., Connolly, P., Archer, L., Hodgen, J., Mazenod, A., Pepper, D., Sloan, S., Taylor, B., Tereshchenko, A., & Travers, M. C. (2017). Attainment Grouping as self-fulfilling prophesy? A mixed methods exploration of self confidence and set level among Year 7 students. International Journal of Educational Research, 86, 96–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.09.001

Gripton, C. (2020). Children’s lived experiences of ‘ability’ in the Key Stage One classroom: life on the ‘tricky table.’ Cambridge Journal of Education, 50(5), 559–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2020.1745149

Hallam, S., Ireson, J., & Davies, J. (2004). Primary pupils’ experiences of different types of grouping in school. British Educational Research Journal, 30(4), 515–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192042000237211

Hargreaves, E., Buchanan, D., & Quick, L. (2021). “Look at them! They all have friends and not me”: the role of peer relationships in schooling from the perspective of primary children designated as “lower-attaining.” Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1882942. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1882942

Hart, S. (1992). Differentiation. Part of the problem or part of the solution? The Curriculum Journal, 3(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/0958517920030203

Inspectorate of Education. (2019). Reken-en wiskundeonderwijs aan potentieel hoogpresterende leerlingen [Mathematics education for potentially high-achieving students]. Inspectie van het Onderwijs.

Janssen, J., Scheltens, F., & Kraemer, J. M. (2005). Rekenen-wiskunde groep 3-8: handleidingen [Mathematics test grade 1-6: manuals]. Cito.

Janssen, J., Verhelst, N., Engelen, R., & Scheltens, F. (2005). Wetenschappelijke verantwoording van de toetsen LOVS rekenen-wiskunde voor groep 3 tot en met 8 [Scientific justification of the mathematics tests for grade 1 through 6]. Cito.

Jerrim, J. (2021). The association between within-class grouping and children’s achievement in mathematics during Year 2, Year 5 and Year 9. School choices report. Education Endowment Foundation. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/public/files/Within_class_grouping_report_-_final.pdf

Kalyuga, S. (2007). Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 19(4), 509–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9054-3

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1

Kirschner, P. A., & Van Merriënboer, J. G. (2013). Do Learners Really Know Best? Urban Legends in Education. Educational Psychologist, 48, 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.804395

Koerhuis, I. (2010). Rekenen voor kleuters [Mathematics for Kindergarteners]. Cito.

Koerhuis, I. ., & Keuning, J. (2011). Wetenschappelijke verantwoording van de toetsen Rekenen voor kleuters voor groep 1 en 2 [Scientific justification of the tests Mathematics for Kindergarteners]. Cito.

Lenth, R. (2020). emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version 1.5 - 2.1. https://cran.r-project.org/package=emmeans

Linneberg, M. S., & Korsgaard, S. (2019). Coding qualitative data: a synthesis guiding the novice. Qualitative Research Journal, 19(3), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-12-2018-0012/FULL/XML

Marks, R. (2013). “The Blue Table Means You Don’t Have a Clue”: the persistence of fixed-ability thinking and practices in primary mathematics in English schools. Forum, 55(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.2304/forum.2013.55.1.31

Marsh, H. W. (1984). Self-Concept, Social Comparison, and Ability Grouping: A Reply to Kulik and Kulik. In Source: American Educational Research Journal (Vol. 21, Issue 4). Winter.

Marsh, H. W. (1987). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept [Article]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.79.3.280

McGillicuddy, D., & Devine, D. (2020). ‘You feel ashamed that you are not in the higher group’—Children’s psychosocial response to ability grouping in primary school. British Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 553–573. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3595

Murray, T., & Arroyo, I. (2002). Toward Measuring and Maintaining the Zone of Proximal Development in Adaptive Instructional Systems. LNCS, 2363, 749–758.

Park, D., Tsukayama, E., Gunderson, E. A., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2016). Young children’s motivational frameworks and math achievement: Relation to teacher-reported instructional practices, but not teacher theory of intelligence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 300–313. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000064

Prast, E.J. & Hickendorff, M. (in press). How do Dutch teachers implement differentiation in primary mathematics education? In: R. Maulana, M. Helms-Lorenz, & R.M. Klassen (Eds.). Effective teaching around the world: Theoretical, empirical, methodological and practical insights. Springer.

Prast, E. J., Van de Weijer-Bergsma, E., Kroesbergen, E. H., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2015). Readiness-based differentiation in primary school mathematics: Expert recommendations and teacher self-assessment. Frontline Learning Research, 3(2), 90–116. https://doi.org/10.14768/flr.v3i2.163

Prast, E. J., Van de Weijer-Bergsma, E., Kroesbergen, E. H., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2018). Differentiated instruction in primary mathematics: Effects of teacher professional development on student achievement. Learning and Instruction, 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.009

Raveaud, M. (2005). Hares, tortoises and the social construction of the pupil: Differentiated learning in French and English primary schools. British Educational Research Journal, 31(4), 459–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920500148697

Roy, A., Guay, F., & Valois, P. (2013). Teaching to address diverse learning needs: Development and validation of a Differentiated Instruction Scale. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(11), 1186–1204. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2012.743604

Rubie-Davies, C. M. (2014). Becoming a high expectation teacher: Raising the bar. Routledge.

Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford university press.

Slim, T., Van Schaik, J., Hotze, A. & Raijmakers, M. (2022, July). Differentiatie in het wetenschap & technologie-onderwijs: overtuiging en praktijk van aankomende- en expertleerkrachten. [Differentiation in science & technology education: attitudes and practices of pre-service teachers and expert teachers]. Poster presented at the Onderwijs Research Dagen [Educational Research Days], Hasselt, Belgium.

Tereshchenko, A., Francis, B., Archer, L., Hodgen, J., Mazenod, A., Taylor, B., Pepper, D., & Travers, M. C. (2019). Learners’ attitudes to mixed-attainment grouping: examining the views of students of high, middle and low attainment. Research Papers in Education, 34(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2018.1452962

Tieso, C. L. (2003). Ability grouping is not just tracking anymore. Roeper Review, 26(1), 29–36.

Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimijoin, K., Conover, L. A., & Reynolds, T. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(2–3), 119–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320302700203

Van den Bergh, L. (2018). Waarderen van diversiteit in het onderwijs [Valuing diversity in education]. Fontys Opleidingscentrum Speciale Onderwijszorg.

Van Geel, M., Keuning, T., Frèrejean, J., Dolmans, D., Van Merriënboer, J., & Visscher, A. J. (2018). Capturing the complexity of differentiated instruction. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 30(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2018.1539013

Van Geel, M., Keuning, T., Visscher, A. J., & Fox, J. P. (2016). Assessing the Effects of a School-Wide Data-Based Decision-Making Intervention on Student Achievement Growth in Primary Schools. American Educational Research Journal, 53(2), 360–394. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216637346

Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., Klingner, J., & Saumell, L. (1995). Students’ views of instructional practices: Implications for inclusion. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18(3), 236–248. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511045

Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., Niarhos, F. J., & Daugherty, T. (1993). What do students think when teachers make adaptations? Teaching and Teacher Education, 9(1), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(93)90018-C

Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., Niarhos, F. J., & Gordon, J. (1993). Students’ perceptions of two hypothetical teachers’ instructional adaptations for low achievers. The Elementary School Journal, 94(1), 87–102.

Visscher, A. J. (2015). Over de zin van opbrengstgericht(er) werken in het onderwijs [About the value of (more) data-based decision making in education]. GION.

Vogt, F., & Rogalla, M. (2009). Developing Adaptive Teaching Competency through coaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(8), 1051–1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.04.002

Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer Verlag New York.