Competencies for Evaluation as a Civic Science

Main Article Content

Thomas Schwandt

Abstract

This paper relocates the practice of evaluation from its traditional intellectual home in the applied social sciences to an interdisciplinary intellectual community that draws on concepts and practices from civic studies, political science, and studies of coproduction and citizen engagement in public administration and management. It offers an overview of the competencies for evaluation practice once relocated in this way.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Schwandt, T. (2023). Competencies for Evaluation as a Civic Science. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 19(46), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v19i46.859
Section
International Evaluator Competence Perspectives

References

Aston, T., Roche, C., Schaaf, M., & Cant, S. (2021). Monitoring and evaluation for thinking and working politically. Evaluation, 28(1), 36-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890211053028

Barthold, L.S. (2017). Giving birth in the public square: the political relevance of dialogue. The Good Society, 26 (2-3), 290-304 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5325/goodsociety.26.2-3.0290

Brandsen, T. & Honingh, M. (2015). Distinguishing different types of coproduction: A conceptual analysis based on classical definitions. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 427-435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12465

Boyte, H.C. (2005). Reframing democracy: Governance, civic agency, and politics. Public Administration Review 65(5), 536-546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00481.x

Boyte, H.C. (2008). Civic driven change and developmental democracy. In A. Fowler & K. Biekart (Eds.), Civic driven change: Citizens’ imagination in action. The Hague: Institute of Social Studies.

Boyte, H.C. (2009). Civic agency and the cult of the expert. Washington, DC: Kettering Foundation.

Boyte, H.C. (2011a). Constructive politics as public work: Organizing the literature. Political Theory, 39(5), 630-660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591711413747

Boyte, H.C. (2011b). Public work and the politics of the commons. The Good Society, 20(1), 84-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/gso.2011.0009

Boyte, H., Elkin, S., Levine, P., Mansbridge, J., Ostrom, E., Sołtan, K, & Smith, R. (2014). The new civic politics: Civic theory and practice for the future. The Good Society, 23(2), 206-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5325/goodsociety.23.2.0206

Brammer, L., Dumlao, R., Falk, A., Hollander, E., Knutson, E., Poehnert, J., Politano, A., & Werner, V. (2012). Core Competencies in Civic Engagement. Center for Engaged Democracy, Merrimack College, School of Education.

Available at: https://scholarworks.merrimack.edu/ced_pubs/1

Center for Engaged Democracy Core Competencies Committee (2013). Core competencies in civic engagement. Journal of Service-Learning in Higher Education, 2, Special section 76-109. Available at https://journals.sfu.ca/jslhe/index.php/jslhe/article/view/59/15

Chambers, R. (2017). Can we know better? Rugby, UK: Practical Action Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3362/9781780449449.000

Cooper, T.L., Bryer, T.A., & Meek, J.W. (2006). Citizen-centered collaborative public management. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 76-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00668.x

Dzur, A. (2008). Democratic professionalism: Citizen participation and the reconstruction of professional ethics, identity, and practice. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Dzur, A. (2018). Democracy inside: Participatory innovation in unlikely places. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190658663.001.0001

Fischer, F. (2009). Democracy and expertise. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199282838.001.0001

Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810503

Forester, J. (1999). The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.

Gutmann, A. & Thompson, D.F. (1996). Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

Hood, S., Hopson, R.K., & Kirkhart, K.E. (2015). Culturally responsive evaluation: Theory, practice, and future implications. In K.E. Newcomer, H.P. Hatry, & J. Wholey (Eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation 4th ed. (pp. 281-317). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171386.ch12

Levine, P. (2011). Seeing like a citizen: The contributions of Elinor Ostrom to “Civic Studies.” The Good Society, 20(1), 3-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/gso.2011.0010

Levine, P. (2017). Guest editor's introduction: On reintegrating facts, values, strategies. The Good Society, 26 (2-3), 195-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5325/goodsociety.26.2-3.0195

Makau, J.M. & Marty, D.L. (2013). Dialogue and deliberation. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.

Mertens, D. (2009). Transformative research and evaluation. New York: Guilford Press.

Michels, A. & De Graaf, L. (2017) Examining citizen participation: local participatory policymaking and democracy revisited, Local Government Studies, 43(6), 875-881. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2017.1365712

Milstein, B., Erickson, J., Gouveia, T., Qureshi, N. & Nelson, C. (2020). Amplifying stewardship: Characteristics and trends stewards consider when expanding equitable well-being. ReThink Health, an initiative of the Ripple Foundation. Available at https://www.rand.org/pubs/external_publications/EP68236.html

Milstein, B. Stojicic, P., Auchincloss, E., & Kelleher, C. (2020). Civic life and system stewardship on the job: how can workers in every industry strengthen the belonging and civic muscle everyone needs to thrive? The Good Society, 29(1-2), 42-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5325/goodsociety.29.1-2.0042

Nabatchi, T., Gastil, J., Weiksner, G.M., & Leighninger, M. (Eds.) (2012). Democracy in motion: Evaluating the practice and impact of civic engagement. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199899265.001.0001

Overman, E.S. (Ed.) (1988). Methodology and epistemology for social science: Selected papers of Donald T. Campbell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Reynolds, M. (2010). Evaluation and stakeholding development. Paper presented at the 9th European Evaluation Society International Conference. Prague, Czech Republic.

Sayer, A. (2011). Why things matter to people: Social science, values and ethical life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511734779

Schmidt-Abbey, B., Reynolds, M., & Ison, R. (2020). Towards systemic evaluation in turbulent times – Second-order practice shift. Evaluation, 26(2): 205–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389020909120

Schwandt, T.A. (2015a). Evaluation foundations revisited: Cultivating a life of the mind for practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Schwandt, T.A. (2015b). “Reconstructing professional ethics & responsibility: Implications of critical systems thinking.” Evaluation, 21, 462-466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389015605199

Schwandt, T.A. & Gates, E.F. (2016). What can evaluation do? An agenda for evaluation in service of an equitable society. In S. Donaldson & R. Picciotto (Eds.), Evaluation for an Equitable Society (pp. 67-81). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Schwandt, T.A. & Gates, E.F. (2021). Evaluating and valuing in social research. New York: Guilford Press.

Selznick, P. (2008). A humanist science: Values and ideals in social inquiry. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804779692

Soltan, K.E. (2011). A civic science. The Good Society, 20(1), 102-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/gso.2011.0004

Sullivan, W. M. (2005) Work and integrity: The crisis and promise of professionalism in America (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Josey-Bass.

Szijarto, B. & Cousins, J.B. (2019). Making space for adaptive learning. American journal of Evaluation, 40(2), 160-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214018781506