Using Culturally Sensitive Methodologies When Researching Diverse Cultures
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article introduces additional information in the ongoing conversation about using culturally sensitive research methods with diverse research populations. Research, including evaluation research, examining ethnic minorities, international, tribal members, and individuals within diverse cultures should be performed within a context of cultural understanding. Several methodological examples will be presented, expanding the discussion of contemporary research with diverse cultures.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Permissions
Authors retain full copyright for articles published in JMDE. JMDE publishes under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY - NC 4.0). Users are allowed to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original authors and source are credited accurately and appropriately. Only the original authors may distribute the article for commercial or compensatory purposes. To view a copy of this license, visit creativecommons.org
References
American Psychological Association. (2002). Guidelines on multicultural education, training, research, practice, and organizational change for psychologists. Retrieved November 14, 2005, from http://www.apa.org
Berry, J. W. (2002). Qualitative approaches in cross-cultural psychology. In Cross-Cultural Psychology: Research and Applications (2nd Ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Bodley, J. H. (1994). Cultural Anthropology: Tribes, States, and the Global System. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
Cokley, K. O. (2005). Racial(ized) identity, ethnic identity, and Afrocentric values: Conceptual and methodological challenges in understanding African American identity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 517-526.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.4.517
Fisher, P. A. & Ball, T. J. (2002). The Indian Wellness Project: An application of the tribal participatory research model. Prevention Science, 3, 235-40.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019950818048
Grills, C., & Longshore, D. (1996). Africentrism: Psychometric analyses of a self-report measure. Journal of Black Psychology, 22, 86-106.
https://doi.org/10.1177/00957984960221007
Guion, L. A., Broadwater, G., Caldwell, C., Chattaraj, S. C., Goddard, H.W., & Lytle, S. S. (2003). Strengthening programs to reach diverse audiences. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Cooperative Extension.
Guion, L. A., & Chattaraj, S. C. (2004). Ethnic marketing: A method to market programs to ethnically diverse audiences in Extension. National Center For Diversity. http://natldiversity.extension.oregonstate.edu/index.htm.
Helms, J. E., & Parham, T. A. (1996). The Racial Identity Attitude Scale. In R. L. Jones (Ed.), Handbook of tests and measurements of Black populations (Vol.2, pp. 167-174). Hampton, VA: Cobb & Henry.
Huer, M. B., & Saenz, T. I. (2003). Challenges and strategies for conducting survey and focus group research with culturally diverse groups. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 209-220.
https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2003/067)
Kitano, H. (1989). A model for counseling Asian Americans. In P. B. Pederson, W. J. Loner, and J. E. Trimble (Eds.), Counseling Across Cultures. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Letiecq, B. L. & Bailey, S. J. (2004). Evaluating from the outside: Conducting cross-cultural evaluation research on an American Indian reservation. Evaluation Review, 28, 342-357.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X04265185
Mkabela, Q. (2005). Using the Afrocentric method in researching indigenous African culture. The Qualitative Report, 10, 178-189.
Neuman, W. L. (2006). Social research methods. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Reviere, R. (2001). Toward an Afrocentric research methodology. Journal of Black Studies, 31, 709-728.
https://doi.org/10.1177/002193470103100601
Phinney, J. S. (1992). The Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure: A new scale for use with diverse groups. Journal of Adolescent Research, 7, 156-176.
https://doi.org/10.1177/074355489272003
Robertson, P., Jorgensen, M. & Garrow, C. (2004). Indigenizing evaluation research: How Lakota methodologies are helping "raise the tipi" in the Ogala Sioux nation. American Indian Quarterly, 28, 499-526.
https://doi.org/10.1353/aiq.2004.0106
Sellers, R. M., Rowley, S. A., Chavous, T. M., Shelton, J. N., & Smith, M. A. (1997). Multidimensional Inventory of Black Identity: A preliminary investigation of reliability and construct validity. Journal of Personality and
https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.73.4.805
Social Psychology, 73, 805-815.
Taylor, J., & Grundy, C. (1996). Measuring Black internalization of White stereotypes about African Americans: The Nadanolitization Scale. In R. L. Jones (Ed.), Handbook of tests and measurements of Black populations (Vol. 2, pp. 217-226). Hampton, VA: Cobb & Henry.
Tillman, L. C. (2002). Culturally sensitive research approaches: An African-American approach. Educational Researcher, 31, 3-12.
https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031009003
U.S. Census Bureau. (2001). Census 2000 PHC-T-I. Population by race and Hispanic or Latino origin for the United States: 1990 and 2000. Retrieved November 28, 2005, from http://www.Census.gov/PRESSrelease/www/2001/tables_redist_national.html#demoprofile
Winters, C. A. (1994). Afrocentrism. A valid frame of reference. Journal of Black Studies, 25, 170-190.