How the I Ching or Book of Changes can Inform Western Notions of Theory of Change
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: This article is the third part of a trilogy. The Eastern paradigm article (Russon, 2008) dealt with ontological issues (the nature of reality). The insight evaluation article (Russon & Russon, 2009) dealt with epistemological issues (how we can know reality).
Purpose: This article deals with a methodological issue—specifically it explores how ancient Chinese philosophy might influence the way in which modern day evaluators think about theories of change.
Setting: Not applicable.
Subjects: Not applicable.
Research Design: Not applicable.
Data Collection and Analysis: The paper is the result of a desk review that compared and contrasted modern theory of change literature with the writings contained in the I Ching or Book of Changes.
Findings: The authors believe that the theories of change expressed in the systems diagrams of the I Ching would be considered to be conducive to recurrent change that occurs due to cycles in the natural world. They further believe that the change which harnesses the power of naturally occurring cycles offers the best hope for long-term sustainability. This is because such change takes advantage of an intuitive cooperation with the natural order.
Conclusions: The authors believe that using the diagrams of the I Ching as a theory of change template offers modern day evaluators a number of advantages. The advantage of greater sustainability has already mentioned. The authors believe that organic theories of change also encourage evaluators to think about the contribution from many factors instead of attribution of a few factors.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Permissions
Authors retain full copyright for articles published in JMDE. JMDE publishes under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY - NC 4.0). Users are allowed to copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original authors and source are credited accurately and appropriately. Only the original authors may distribute the article for commercial or compensatory purposes. To view a copy of this license, visit creativecommons.org
References
Capra, F. (2000). The Tao of physics. Boston, MA: Shambala.
Gladwell, M. (2002). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. Little, Brown and Company.
Jung, C. (2003). Forward. In R. Wilhelm (translator), I Ching or book of changes. London: Penguin.
Wyatt Knowlton, L., & Phillips, C. (2009). The logic model guidebook: Better strategies for great results. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Legge, J. (translator). (1996). I Ching: Book of changes. New York, Gramercy. Meadows, D. (1997). Places to intervene in a system in increasing order of effectiveness. Whole Earth, 91, 78-85.
Melyan, G., & Chu, W. (1977). The pocket I-Ching. Boston, MA: Castle Books. Ong, Y-P. (2005). Introduction and notes. In C. Muller (Trans.), Tao te ching. New York, NY: Barnes & Noble Classics.
Polyani, M. (1967). The tacit dimension. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
Russon, C. (2008). An Eastern paradigm of evaluation. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 5(10), 71-77. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v5i10.183
Russon, C., & Russon, K. (2009). The insight evaluation approach. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 6(12), 205-209. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v6i12.231
Wilhelm, R. (translator). (2003). I Ching or book of changes. London: Penguin.