How Different Diversity Factors Affect the Perception of First-Year Requirements in Higher Education
Main Article Content
Abstract
In the light of growing university entry rates, higher education institutions not only serve larger numbers of students, but also seek to meet first-year students’ ever more diverse needs. Yet to inform universities how to support the transition to higher education, research only offers limited insights. Current studies tend to either focus on the individual factors that affect student success or they highlight students’ social background and their educational biography in order to examine the achievement of selected, non-traditional groups of students. Both lines of research appear to lack integration and often fail to take organisational diversity into account, such as different types of higher education institutions or degree programmes. For a more comprehensive understanding of student diversity, the present study includes individual, social and organisational factors. To gain insights into their role for the transition to higher education, we examine how the different factors affect the students’ perception of the formal and informal requirements of the first year as more or less difficult to cope with. As the perceived requirements result from both the characteristics of the students and the institutional context, they allow to investigate transition at the interface of the micro and the meso level of higher education. Latent profile analyses revealed that there are no profiles with complex patterns of perception of the first-year requirements, but the identified groups rather differ in the overall level of perceived challenges. Moreover, SEM indicates that the differences in the perception largely depend on the individual factors self-efficacy and volition.
Article Details
FLR adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Creative Common License (BY-NC-ND). That is, Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors with, however, first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.
References
Asikainen, H., Hailikari, T., & Mattsson, M. (2018). The interplay between academic emotions, psychological flexibility and self-regulation as predictors of academic achievement. Journal of further and higher education, 42(4), 439-453. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1281889
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control (Vol. 4). Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.
Barnat, M., Bosse, E., & Mergner, J. (2017). Forschungsbasierte Qualitätsentwicklung für die Studieneingangsphase. Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung, 12(3), 71–91.
Barnat, M., Bosse, E., & Trautwein, C. (2017). The guiding role of theory in mixed-methods research: Combining individual and institutional perspectives on the transition to higher education. In J. Huisman & M. Tight (Eds.), Theory and method in higher education research (Vol. 3, pp. 1–19). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2056-375220170000003001
Bartimote-Aufflick, K., Bridgeman, A., Walker, R., Sharma, M., & Smith, L. (2016). The study, evaluation, and improvement of university student self-efficacy. Studies in Higher Education, 41(11), 1918–1942. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.999319
Bernardo, A., Esteban, M., Fernández, E., Cervero, A., Tuero, E., & Solano, P. (2016). Comparison of personal, social and academic variables related to university drop-out and persistence. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1610. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01610
Bohndick, C., & Buhl, H. M. (2014). Auf dem Weg zur Professionalisierung: Anforderungen im Lehramtsstudium. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 28(1), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000119
Bohndick, C., Kohlmeyer, S., & Buhl, H. M. (2019). Anstoß und Unterstützung der professionellen Weiterentwicklung überfachlicher Kompetenzen im Studium durch weiterentwicklungsorientiertes Online-Self-Assessment. Lehrerbildung auf dem Prüfstand, 12 (1), 19-31.
Bohndick, C., Rosman, T., Kohlmeyer, S., & Buhl, H. M. (2018). The interplay between subjective abilities and subjective demands and its relationship with academic success. An application of the person–environment fit theory. Higher Education, 75(5), 839–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0173-6
Bosse, E. (2015). Exploring the role of student diversity for the first-year experience. Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung, 10(4), 45–66.
Brandstätter, H., Grillich, L., & Farthofer, A. (2006). Prognose des Studienabbruchs. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 38(3), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1026/0049-8637.38.3.121
Bülow-Schramm, M. (2018). Faktoren für Studienerfolg – eine kritische Analyse von Bachelorstudiengängen. In N. Hericks (Ed.), Hochschulen im Spannungsfeld der Bologna-Reform: Erfolge und ungewollte Nebenfolgen aus interdisziplinärer Perspektive (pp. 311–334). Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21290-2_18
Coertjens, L., Brahm, T., Trautwein, C., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2017). Students’ transition into higher education from an international perspective. Higher Education, 73(3), 357–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0092-y
Dangoisse, F., De Clercq, M., Van Meenen, F. V., Chartier, L., & Nils, F. (2019). When disability becomes ability to navigate the transition to higher education: a comparison of students with and without disabilities. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 35(4), 513-528. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2019.1708642
De Clercq, M., Galand, B., & Frenay, M. (2016). Transition from high school to university: a person-centered approach to academic achievement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 32(1), 39-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-016-0298-5
De Clercq, M., Van Meenen, F., & Frenay, M. (2020). Les écueils de la transition universitaire: validation française du questionnaire des obstacles académiques (QoA). Evaluer. Journal international de Recherche en Education et Formation. A paraître.
Duchatelet, D., & Donche, V. (2019). Fostering self-efficacy and self-regulation in higher education: a matter of autonomy support or academic motivation? Higher Education Research & Development, 38(4), 733-747. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1581143
Ebert, J., & Heublein, U. (2017). Studienabbruch bei Studierenden mit Migrationshintergrund. Eine vergleichende Untersuchung der Ursachen und Motive des Studienabbruchs bei Studierenden mit und ohne Migrationshintergrund auf Basis der Befragung der Exmatrikulierten des Sommersemesters 2014. Deutsches Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung. https://www.dzhw.eu/pdf/21/bericht_mercator.pdf
Gonida, E., & Peixoto, F. (2019). SUnStAR IO1. Literature review and conceptualization. Aristotle University.
Haarala-Muhonen, A., Ruohoniemi, M., Parpala, A., Komulainen, E., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2017). How do the different study profiles of first-year students predict their study success, study progress and the completion of degrees? Higher Education, 74(6), 949–962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0087-8
Hell, B., Ptok, C., & Schuler, H. (2007). Methodik zur Ermittlung und Validierung von Anforderungen an Studierende (MEVAS). Anforderungsanalyse für das Fach Wirtschaftswissenschaften. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 51(2), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089.51.2.88
Heublein, U., Ebert, J., Hutzsch, C., Isleib, S., König, R., Richter, J., & Woisch, A. (2017). Zwischen Studienerwartungen und Studienwirklichkeit - Ursachen des Studienabbruchs, beruflicher Verbleib der Studienabbrecherinnen und Studienabbrecher und Entwicklung der Studienabbruchquote an deutschen Hochschulen. Deutsches Zentrum für Hoch- und Wissenschaftsforschung. http://www.dzhw.eu/pdf/pub_fh/fh-201701.pdf
Heublein, U., Richter, J., & Schmelzer, R. (2020). Die Entwicklung der Studien¬abbruchquoten in Deutschland. DZHW Brief, 3, 1-12. https://www.dzhw.eu/pdf/pub_brief/dzhw_brief_03_2020.pdf
Holmegaard, H. T., Madsen, L. M., & Ulriksen, L. (2017). Why should European higher education care about the retention of non-traditional students? European Educational Research Journal, 16(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116683688
Hußtegge, R. (2011). Selbstreguliertes Wollen als Bedingung für Studienerfolg an der Universität. Oldenburg.
Jänsch, V. K., & Bosse, E. Messinstrument für die Wahrnehmung von Studienanforderungen (MWS). Zusammenstellung Sozialwissenschaftlicher Items Und Skalen (ZIS). https://doi.org/10.6102/zis263
Jansen, E. P. W. A. (2004). The influence of the curriculum organization on study progress in higher education. Higher Education, 47(4), 411–435. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HIGH.0000020868.39084.21
Jenert, T., Postareff, L., Brahm, T., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2015). Editorial: Enculturation and development of beginning students. Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung, 10(4), 9–21.
Kehm, B. M. (2010). Germany. In J. J.F. Forest & P. G. Altbach (Eds.), International Handbook of Higher Education. Part One: Global Themes and Contemporary Challenges, Part Two: Regions and Countries (pp. 729–745). Springer.
Kyndt, E., Donche, V., Trigwell, K., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (Eds.). (2017). Higher education transitions - Theory and research. Routledge.
Locke, E. A., Latham, G. P., & Erez, M. (1988). The determinants of goal commitment. Academy of Management Review, 13(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.2307/258352
Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Morin, A. J. (2009). Classical latent profile analysis of academic self-concept dimensions: Synergy of person-and variable-centered approaches to theoretical models of self-concept. Structural Equation Modeling, 16(2), 191-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510902751010
Mountford-Zimdars, A., Sabri, D., Moore, J., Sanders, J., Jones, S., & Higham, L. (2015). Causes of Differences in Student Outcomes. HEFCE. https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/causes-of-differences-in-student-outcomes-hefce(02e33718-9d04-4b8c-9f48-97443da93082)/export.html
Nolden, P. (2019). Enhancing student self-reflection: The SRT scale inventory. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23089.53600
OECD. (2019). Education at a Glance 2019: OECD Indicators. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/f8d7880d-en
Pascarella, E. T., Pierson, C. T., Wolniak, G. C., & Terenzini, P. T. (2004). First-generation college students. Additional evidence on college experiences and outcomes. The Journal of Higher Education, 75(3), 249–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2004.11772256
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539-569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838
Robbins, S. B., Oh, I. S., Le, H., & Button, C. (2009). Intervention effects on college performance and retention as mediated by motivational, emotional, and social control factors: Integrated meta-analytic path analyses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1163–1184. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015738
Schindler, S. (2014). Wege zur Studienberechtigung – Wege ins Studium? Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-03841-0
Schindler, S., & Lörz, M. (2011). Mechanisms of social inequality development: Primary and secondary effects in the transition to tertiary education between 1976 and 2005. European Sociological Review, 28(5), 647–660. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcr032
Schneider, M. & Preckel, F. (2017). Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 143(6), 565-600. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000098
Schuetze, H. G., & Slowey, M. (2002). Participation and exclusion: A comparative analysis of non-traditional students and lifelong learners in higher education. Higher Education, 44(3), 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019898114335
Sneyers, E., & De Witte, K. (2018). Interventions in higher education and their effect on student success: A meta-analysis. Educational Review, 70(2), 208–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2017.1300874
Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. University of Chicago Press.
Tönnies, S., Plöhn, S., & Krippendorf, U. (1996). Skalen zur psychischen Gesundheit (SPG).
Trautwein, C., & Bosse, E. (2017). The first year in higher education – critical requirements from the student perspective. Higher Education, 73(3), 371–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0098-5
Trautwein, C., & Stolz, K. (2015). ‘Press on regardless!’ –The role of volitional control in the first year of higher education. Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung, 10(49, 123–143.
Ulriksen, L. (2009). The implied student. Studies in Higher Education, 34(5), 517–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802597135
Van Den Berg, M. N., & Hofman, W. H. A. (2005). Student success in university education: A multi-measurement study of the impact of student and faculty factors on study progress. Higher Education, 50(3), 413–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6361-1
Wallis, M., & Bosse, E. (2020). Studienrelevante Heterogenität in der Studieneingangsphase am Beispiel der Wahrnehmung von Studienanforderungen. Beiträge zur Hochschulforschung, 42(3), 8-30.
Wong, B., & Chiu, Y.-L. T. (2019). Exploring the concept of ‘ideal’ university student. Studies in Higher Education, https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1643302