Reflective Mediation: Toward a Sociocultural Conception of Situated Reflection

Main Article Content

Christian Dalsgaard

Abstract

The objective of the article is to contribute to the development of a sociocultural conception of situated reflection that can be used in empirical studies of reflection, and that can be utilised in development of educational practices. Based on a development of the concept of 'reflective mediation', a conception of reflection is developed from a situated understanding of learning processes. Taking a situated approach, the concept of reflective mediation describes how to understand reflection as an integral part of the immediate activities of the individual. A theoretical framework is developed for empirical studies on reflective activities of higher education students. The framework can be utilised by teachers to develop teaching methods in support of reflection in student learning. The concept of reflective mediation is developed from a combination of pragmatism and cultural historical activity theory, and it covers seven categories of learning and reflection processes. The article makes a distinction between three forms of mediation, two forms of empirical reflection, and two forms of theoretical reflection. The article concludes in a discussion of the implications of the theoretical framework for educational research and for teaching practices within higher education.


The article is frontline in the sense that it aims at developing a theoretical conception of situated reflection by combining cultural historical activity theory with pragmatism and theories of situated learning. The novelty of the article is to consider levels of human activity as levels of reflection and to introduce the distinction between theoretical and empirical reflection. Further, the article provides arguments that awareness of objects and instruments of human activity forms the basis of reflective processes. Finally, the article explains how reflection can connect levels of human activity and learning.

Article Details

How to Cite
Dalsgaard, C. (2020). Reflective Mediation: Toward a Sociocultural Conception of Situated Reflection. Frontline Learning Research, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v8i1.447
Section
Articles

References

References

Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. The University of Chicago Press.

Billet, S. (1996). Situated Learning: Bridging Sociocultural and Cognitive Theorising, Learning and Instruction, Vol 6(3), pp. 263-280.

Billet, S. (2001). Knowing in practice: re-conceptualising vocational expertise, Learning and Instruction, 11 (2001), pp. 431-452.

Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher, Vol. 18(1), 32-42.

Chaiklin, Seth, & Lave, Jean. (1996). Understanding practice. Perspectives on activity and context. Cambridge University Press.

Compton, P. (2013). Situated cognition and knowledge acquisition research, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol 71(2013), pp. 184–190.

Davydov, V. V. (1988). Problems of Developmental Teaching (Part I). Soviet Education, August.

Davydov, V. V. (1999). What is Real Learning Activity? In M. Hedegaard, & J. Lompscher (Eds.), Learning Activity and Development (pp. 123-138). Aarhus University Press.

Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education. The Free Press.

Dewey, J. (1938). Logic. The Theory of Inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

Dewey, J. (1958). Experience and nature. New York: Dover Publications.

Dewey, J. (1997). How we think. New York: Dover Publications.

Engeström, Y. (2014). Learning by expanding. An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press December 2014.

Engeström, Y. (1999). Expansive visibilization of work: An activity-theoretical perspective. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 8(1), 63-93.

Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of education and work, 14(1), 133-156.

Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1-24.

Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2012). Whatever happened to process theories of learning? Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1 (1), 45 – 56.

Fors, V., Bäckström, Å., & Pink, S. (2013). Multisensory emplaced learning: Resituating situated learning in a moving world, Mind, Culture, and Activity, Vol 20(2), pp. 170-183.

Hutchins, Edwin (1995). Cognition in the Wild. London: The MIT Press.

Hutchins, Edwin (1996). Learning to navigate. I: Chaiklin, Seth and Lave, Jean (red.). Understanding practice. Perspectives on activity and context, p. 35-63. Cambridge University Press.

Lave, J. (1996). The practice of learning. In S. Chaiklin, & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice. Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 3-32). Cambridge University Press.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.

Leontev, A. N. (1978). Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Online: http://www.marxists.org/archive/leontev/works/1978/index.htm.

Leontyev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

Roth, W-M. & Jornet, A. (2013). Situated cognition, WIREs Cogn Sci, Vol 4, pp. 463–478. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1242.

Salomon, G. (1993). Distributed cognitions. Cambridge University Press.

Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1998). Individual and social aspects of learning. Review of research in education, 1-24.

Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner. Ashgate.

Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Semin, G.R. & E.R. (2013). Socially Situated Cognition, Social Cognition, Vol. 31(2), pp. 125–146.

Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions. Cambridge University Press.

Suchman, L. A., & Trigg, R. H. (1996). Artificial intelligence as craftwork. In S. Chaiklin, & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice. Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 144-178). Cambridge University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. London: Harvard University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Though and Language. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Wartofsky, M. W. (1968). Conceptual Foundations of Scientific Thought. New York: The Macmillan Company.

Wartofsky, M. W. (1979). Models: Representation and the Scientific Understanding. D. Reidel Publishing Company.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice. Cambridge University Press.

Wertsch, J. V. (1994). The Primacy of Mediated Action in Sociocultural Studies. Mind, Culture, and Activity, Vol. 1(4), 202-208.