Revisiting learning in higher education—Framing notions redefined through an ecological perspective
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this contribution, we employ an ecological approach as a resourceful means of revisiting the notion of learning in the knowledge society in general and in higher education in particular. Learning is re-conceptualised as a process entailing mutually constitutive, epistemic, social and affective relations in which knowledge, identity and agency become collective achievements of ecosystems. This process entails a trans-contextual and multimodal endeavour, through which both learners and their social and material environments change. Throughout the paper, we discuss implications of an ecological approach to framing notions central to current educational research, namely (a) knowledge co-construction and epistemic agency, (b) the role of (material) knowledge resources in the learning process and (c) the trans-contextuality that characterises learning in today’s knowledge society. We conclude by discussing prospects that an ecological perspective offer to higher education research and practice. The insights emerging from this re-conceptualisation imply changes in the ways we analytically account for and enhance the transformative potential of education. They also indicate a necessity for further advancing our understanding of learners’ ways of assembling the epistemic space necessary to engage in meaningful learning, their agency and authoritative positioning in this process, and their relationship with the (social, material) environment.
Article Details
FLR adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Creative Common License (BY-NC-ND). That is, Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors with, however, first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.
References
Ashwin, P. (2008). Accounting for structure and agency in ‘close-up’ research on teaching, learning and assessment in higher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 151–158.
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Callon, M. (1984). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the callps and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. The Sociological Review, 32, 196–233.
Carvalho, L., & Goodyear, P. (2014). The architecture of productive learning networks. New York, NY: Routledge.
Damşa, C. I., Kirschner, P. A., Andriessen, J. E. B., Erkens, G., & Sins, P. H. M. (2010). Shared epistemic agency - An empirical study of an emergent construct. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 143–186. doi:10.1080/10508401003708381
Damşa, C., Ludvigsen, S., & Andriessen, J. (2013). Knowledge co-construction – Epistemic consensus or relational assent? In M. Baker, J. Andriessen, & S. Jaarvela (Eds.), Affective learning together: Social and emotional dimensions of collaborative learning (pp. 97-119). London, England: Routledge Academic Publishers & Taylor and Francis Group.
Damşa, C.I., & Nerland, M. (2016). Student learning through participation in inquiry activities: Two cases from teaching and computer engineering education. Vocations and Learning, doi:10.1007/s12186-016-9152-9
Dewey, J. (1997). Education and Experience. New York, NY: Touchstone. (Original work published 1938)
Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. F. (1999). Knowing and the known. In R. Handy & E. E. Hardwood (Eds.), Useful procedures of inquiry (pp. 97–209). Great Barrington, MA: Behavioral Research Council. (Original work published 1949)
Engeström, Y. (2010). Expansive learning at work: toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-156.
Engeström, Y., Sannino, A., & Virkkunen, J. (2014). On the methodological demands of formative interventions. Mind, Culture and Activity, 21(2), 118–128. doi:10.1080/10749039.2014.891868
Erstad, O. (2013). Digital learning lives: Trajectories, literacies, and schooling. New York, Bern, Berlin, Bruxelles, Frankfurt am Main, Oxford, Wien, Peter Lang Publishing Group.
Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuk, P. R. (2012). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the socio-material. London: Routledge.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Heo, H., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, Y. (2010). Exploratory study on the patterns of online interaction and knowledge co-construction in project-based learning. Computers & Education, 55, 1383–1392.
Ingold, T. (2011). Redrawing anthropology: Materials, movements, lines. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
Ingold, T. (2015). The life of lines. London, England: Routledge.
Jornet, A., Roth, W.-M., & Krange, I. (2016). A transactional approach to transfer episodes. Journal of the Learning Sciences. doi:10.1080/10508406.2016.1147449
Jornet, A., & Steier, R. (2015). The matter of space: Bodily performances and the emergence of boundary objects during multidisciplinary design meetings. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 22, 129–151.
Kumpulainen, K. (2013). The legacy of productive disciplinary engagement. International Journal of Educational Research, 64, 215–220. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.07.006
Latour, B. (2013). An inquiry into modes of existence: An anthropology of the moderns. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Markauskaite, L., & Goodyear, P. (2014). Professional work and knowledge. In S. Billett, C. Harteis, & H. Gruber (Eds.), International handbook of research in professional and practice-based learning (pp. 79–106). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Orlikowski, W. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28, 1435–1448. doi:10.1177/0170840607081138
Packer, J. M., & Goicoechea, J. (2000). Sociocultural and constructivist theories of learning: Ontology, not just epistemology. Educational Psychologist, 35(4), 227–241. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3504_02
Reed, S. K. (2012). Learning by mapping across situations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 353–398.
Richter, C., Allert, H., Albrecht, J., & Ruhl, E. (2015). Grappling with the not-yet-known. In O. Lindwall, P. Häkkinen, T. Koschman, P. Tchounikine, & S. Ludvigsen (Eds.), Exploring the material conditions of learning: The computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL) Conference 2015, Volume 1 (pp. 284–291). Gothenburg, Sweden: The International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Roth, W.-M. (2015). The primacy of the social and sociogenesis. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. doi:10.1007/s12124-015-9331-5
Roth, W.-M., & Jornet, A. (2014). Toward a theory of experience. Science Education, 98, 106–126.
Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2006). Fostering knowledge construction in university students through asynchronous discussion groups. Computers & Education, 46, 349–370.
Stetsenko, A. (2005). Activity as object-related: Resolving the dichotomy of individual and collective planes of activity. Mind, Culture, and Social Interaction, 12(1), 70–88. doi:10.1207/s15327884mca1201_6
Stetsenko, A. (2008). From relational ontology to transformative activist stance on development and learning: Expanding Vygotsky’s (CHAT) project. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 471–491.
Säljö, R. (2010). Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: Technologies, social memory and the performative nature of learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 53–64. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00341.x
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 1. Problems of general psychology. New York, NY: Plenum.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1989). Concrete human psychology. Soviet Psychology, 27, 53–77.
Vygotsky, L. S. (2012). Thought and language (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1986)