The development of visual expertise in a virtual environment: A case of maritime pilots in training
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study connects to an ongoing discussion about the limits and affordances of simulators as realistic and relevant contexts for professional learning, in this case in the development of visual expertise. Earlier studies of simulator-based maritime pilot training conclude that there are risks associated with so-called negative skills transfer due to a lack of photorealism in simulator environments. The aim of this study is to carefully examine how visual expertise develops in and through training in a simulated environment. Through a practice-based approach to the development of visual expertise, and by using qualitative interaction analysis of video recorded training sessions, the analytical focus is directed towards maritime pilot trainees’ talk about imperfections and inconsistencies in the virtual environment during exercises in a high-fidelity bridge simulator. Considering the multi-layered nature of the maritime pilot’s visual expertise, findings show that the maritime pilots in training noticed and adapted to the specific methodological and technological challenges when manoeuvring a simulated vessel. During such reflection-in-action, they also commented on and explored the differences between, navigating in a simulator, on the one hand, and, on the other hand, navigating on board a ship. Instead of concluding that there is a risk for negative skills transfer that follows from the differences between the two contexts of navigating, we argue that the challenges introduced by representations encountered when training in a virtual environment may add to the expertise of the trainees and lead to enriched conceptual, methodological, and technical knowledge regarding the specificities of visually demanding and ambiguous navigation situations. In this way, this study contributes to advance our understanding of learning in virtual environments to the frontline of learning research.
Article Details
FLR adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Creative Common License (BY-NC-ND). That is, Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors with, however, first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.
References
Bassetti, C. (2021). The tacit dimension of expertise: Professional vision at work in airport security. Discourse Studies, 23(5), 597-615. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456211020141
Boucheix, J.-M. (2017). The interplay between methodologies, tasks and visualisation formats in the study of visual expertise. Frontline Learning Research, 5(3), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v5i3.311
Comi, A., Jaradat, S., & Whyte, J. (2019). Constructing shared professional vision in design work: The role of visual objects and their material mediation. Design Studies, 64, 90-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.06.003
Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology's program: Working out Durkheim's aphorism. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Gegenfurtner, A., Gruber, H., Holzberger, D., Keskin, Ö., Lehtinen, E., Seidel, T., ... & Säljö, R. (2022). Towards a cognitive theory of visual expertise: methods of inquiry. In: C. Damsa, A. Rajala, G. Ritella & J. Brouwer (Eds.), Re-theorizing learning and research methods in learning research. Routledge.
Gegenfurtner, A., Kok, E., van Geel, K., De Bruin, A., Jarodzka, H., Szulewski, A., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2017). The challenges of studying visual expertise in medical image diagnosis. Medical Education, 51(1), 97-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13205
Gegenfurtner, A., Nivala, M., Säljö, R., & Lehtinen, E. (2009). Capturing Individual and Institutional Change: Exploring Horizontal versus Vertical Transitions in Technology-Rich Environments. In: U. Cress, V. Dimitrova & M. Specht (Eds.). Learning in the Synergy of Multiple Disciplines. Springer.
Gegenfurtner, A., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2017). Methodologies for Studying Visual Expertise. Frontline Learning Research, 5(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v5i3.316
Gegenfurtner, A., Lehtinen, E., Helle, L., Nivala, M., Svedström, E., & Säljö, R. (2019). Learning to see like an expert: On the practices of professional vision and visual expertise. International Journal of Educational Research, 98, 280-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.09.003
Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633. doi:10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
Heath C., Hindmarsh, J. & Luff, P. (2010). Video in qualitative research: Analysing social interaction in everyday life. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Helle, L. (2017). Prospects and Pitfalls in Combining Eye-Tracking Data and Verbal Reports. Frontline Learning Research, 5(3), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v5i3.254
Hindmarsh, J., Hyland, L., & Banerjee, A. (2014). Work to make simulation work: ‘Realism’, instructional correction and the body in training. Discourse Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613514670
Hontvedt, M. (2015). Professional vision in simulated environments—Examining professional maritime pilots' performance of work tasks in a full-mission ship simulator. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.07.003
Ivarsson, J. (2017). Visual expertise as embodied practice. Frontline Learning Research, 5(3), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v5i3.253
Jarodzka, H., & Boshuizen, H. P. (2017). Unboxing the black box of visual expertise in medicine. Frontline Learning Research, 5(3), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v5i3.332
Kim, T. E., Sharma, A., Bustgaard, M., Gyldensten, W. C., Nymoen, O. K., Tusher, H. M., & Nazir, S. (2021). The continuum of simulator-based maritime training and education. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 20(2), 135-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-021-00242-2
Knoblauch, H., & Schnettler, B. (2012). Videography: Analysing video data as a ‘focused’ethnographic and hermeneutical exercise. Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1468794111436147
Lehtinen, E., Gegenfurtner, A., Helle, L., & Säljö, R. (2020). Conceptual change in the development of visual expertise. International Journal of Educational Research, 100, 101545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101545
Lützhöft, M. H., & Nyce, J. M. (2006). Piloting by heart and by chart. The journal of navigation, 59(2), 221-237. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463306003663
Lützhöft, M. H., & Dekker, S. W. (2002). On your watch: automation on the bridge. The Journal of Navigation, 55(1), 83-96. doi:10.1017/S0373463301001588
Lymer, G. (2009). Demonstrating professional vision: The work of critique in architectural education. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 16(2), 145-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749030802590580
Nivala, M., Rystedt, H., Säljö, R., Kronqvist, P., & Lehtinen, E. (2012). Interactive visual tools as triggers of collaborative reasoning in entry-level pathology. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(4), 499-518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-012-9153-0
Norris, S. (2012). Multimodal interaction analysis. In: The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Wiley Online Library.
Petersen, S.B., Vestergaard, A.H., Thomsen, A.S.S., Konge, L., Cour, M.L., Grauslund, J. & Vergmann, A.S. (2022). Pretraining of basic skills on a virtual reality vitreoretinal simulator: A waste of time. Acta Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.15039
Popova, K. (2018). Ethnomethodological studies of visuality. Ethnographic Studies, 15, 23-37.
Rystedt, H., & Sjöblom, B. (2012). Realism, authenticity, and learning in healthcare simulations: rules of relevance and irrelevance as interactive achievements. Instructional science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9213-x
Schul, A., Gong, A., & Sweet, R. (2019). MP35-13 DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A HIGH-FIDELITY URETHRAL CATHETER SIMULATOR. The Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JU.0000556003.94745.db
Sellberg, C. (2017). Representing and enacting movement: The body as an instructional resource in a simulator-based environment. Education and Information Technologies, 22, 2311–2332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9546-1
Sellberg, C., & Lundin, M. (2017). Demonstrating professional intersubjectivity: The instructor's work in simulator-based learning environments. Learning, culture and social interaction, 13, 60-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.02.003
Styhre, A. (2010). Knowledge work and practices of seeing: Epistemologies of the eye, gaze, and professional vision. Culture and Organization, 16(4), 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2010.519931
Taber, M. J. (2013). Crash attenuating seats: Effects on helicopter underwater escape performance. Safety science, 57, 179-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.02.007
Wiig, C., Silseth, K., & Erstad, O. (2018). Creating intercontextuality in students learning trajectories. Opportunities and difficulties. Language and Education, 32(1), 43-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2017.1367799