Attention, individualism, and humility: Using the theories of Simone Weil to disrupt neoliberal discourses in early childhood education.
Keywords:
educational philosophy,Abstract
Early childhood education in Aotearoa New Zealand is affected by educational policies which promote neoliberalist aims. Individualism is a key characteristic of neoliberalist discourses, promoting individualistic and competitive values in order to expand national human capital to be traded within the global market (Besley & Peters, 2007). Serving as a contraposition, the theory of attention, and the theme of humility within the writings of Simone Weil promote deference and submission of individualistic desires. Drawing upon the conference theme of ‘Stepping back and being present’ the act of attention is examined as a theoretical concept which can promote the ways in which educators can step back, but remain present for and with children. From this exploration, the persistent theme of humility in Weil’s writings is brought to the fore, generating discussion on how humility can disrupt the discourse of individualism. Concluding statements expand upon how these theories can empower early childhood educators to resist neoliberal enculturation in the contemporary milieu.
References
Apple, M. W. (2004). Creating difference: Neo-liberalism, neo-conservatism and the politics of educational reform. Educational Policy, 18(1), 12–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904803260022
Arndt, S., & Tesar, M. (2015). Early childhood assessment in Aotearoa New Zealand: Critical perspectives and fresh openings. Journal of Pedagogy, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/jped-2015-0014
Barraclough, S. J., & Smith, A. B. (1996). Do parents choose and value quality child care in New Zealand? International Journal of Early Years Education, 4(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966976960040101
Besley, T. (A. C. ., & Peters, M. A. (2007). Understanding the neoliberal paradigm of education policy. In Subjectivity & Truth: Foucault, Education, & the Culture of Self (pp. 131–154). Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
Biesta, G. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: ethics, politics, democracy. Boulder, Colorado: Paradigm Publishers.
Buchanan, E. (2011). Assessment in New Zealand Early Childhood Education: A Foucauldian Analysis (Masters Thesis). Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand. Retrieved from http://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/handle/10063/1691
Buchanan, E. (2016). Economistic subjects: Questioning early childhood pedagogies of learning, participation, and voice. In T. Lightfoot-Rueda, R. L. Peach, & N. Leask (Eds.), Global Perspectives on Human Capital in Early Childhood Education: Reconceptualizing Theory, Policy, and Practice (pp. 199–213). Springer.
Carr, M., Lee, W., & Jones, C. (2004). Kei tua o te pae. Assessment for learning: early childhood exemplars. Wellington: Learning Media.
Davies, B. (2005). The (im)possibility of intellectual work in neoliberal regimes. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 26(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300500039310
Davies, B., & Bansel, P. (2007). Neoliberalism and education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(3), 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390701281751
Davies, B., Browne, J., Gannon, S., Honan, E., & Somerville, M. (2005). Embodied Women at Work in Neoliberal Times and Places. Gender, Work & Organization, 12(4), 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2005.00277.x
Devine, N., & Irwin, R. (2005). Autonomy, Agency and Education: He tangata, he tangata, he tangata. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 37(3), 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2005.00122.x
Duhn, I. (2006). The making of global citizens: Traces of cosmopolitanism in the New Zealand early childhood curriculum, Te Whāriki. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 7(3), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2006.7.3.191
Farquhar, S. (2008). Narrative identity: Ricoeur and early childhood education (Thesis). ResearchSpace@Auckland. Retrieved from https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/handle/2292/2625
Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.
Foucault, M. (1996). The ethics of the concern for self as a practice of freedom. In S. Lotringer (Trans.), Foucault live: (interviews, 1961-1984). New York, N.Y.: Semiotext(e).
Foucault, M. (2008a). 28th March 1979. In The birth of biopolitics: lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-79. Basingstoke [England] ; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Foucault, M. (2008b). The birth of biopolitics: lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-79. Basingstoke [England] ; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fukuda-Parr, S. (2003). The human development paradigm: operationalizing Sen’s ideas on capabilities. Feminist Economics, 9(2–3), 301–317.
Haraway, D. (2015). Anthropocene, capitalocene, plantationocene, chthulucene: Making kin. Environmental Humanities, 6(1), 159–165.
Kindercare. (2014). Outstanding childcare for babies, toddlers & preschoolers/Kindercare. Retrieved December 4, 2014, from http://www.kindercare.co.nz/About+Us/whatmakesusexceptional.html
Kjørholt, A. T. (2013). Childhood as Social Investment, Rights and the Valuing of Education. Children & Society, 27(4), 245–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12037
Lips-Wiersma, M., & Nilakant, V. (2008). Practical Compassion: Toward a Critical Spiritual Foundation for Corporate Responsibility. In J. Biberman & L. T. MBA (Eds.), Spirituality in Business (pp. 51–72). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230611887_4
May, H. (2001). Politics in the playground: The world of early childhood in postwar New Zealand. Wellington, N.Z: Bridget Williams Books with the New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
May, H. (2013). The discovery of early childhood (Second edition). Wellington: NZCER Press.
McKeen, W. (2007). The National Children’s Agenda: A Neoliberal Wolf in Lamb’s Clothing. Studies in Political Economy, 80(0). Retrieved from http://spe.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/spe/article/download/5193
McNay, L. (2009). Self as Enterprise: Dilemmas of Control and Resistance in Foucault’s The Birth of Biopolitics. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(6), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409347697
Moss, P. (2009). There are alternatives! Markets and democratic experimentalism in early childhood education and care. The Hague, The Netherlands: Bernard van Leer Foundation and Bertelsmann Stiftung. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED522533.pdf
Moss, P. (2014). Transformative change and real utopias in early childhood education: a story of democracy, experimentation and potentiality. New York, NY: Routledge.
National Party of New Zealand. (2014). Investment in early childhood education gets results. Retrieved from http://www.national.org.nz/Article.aspx?ArticleID=43141
National Party of New Zealand. (2017, March). A better education for our children. Retrieved March 20, 2017, from https://www.national.org.nz/a_better_education_for_our_children
New Zealand Ministry of Education. (1996). Te Whāriki: He whāriki mātauranga mō ngā mokopuna o Aotearoa: Early childhood curriculum. Wellington, N.Z.: Ministry of Education.
New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2014). Community based early childhood education: Governing and managing. [Wellington, N.Z: Published for the Ministry of Education by Learning Media. Retrieved from http://www.lead.ece.govt.nz/ManagementInformation/Funding/FundingHandbook.aspx
Olssen, M. (1996). In defence of the welfare state and publicly provided education: a New Zealand perspective. Journal of Education Policy, 11(3), 337–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093960110305
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2006). Starting strong II: Early childhood education and care. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016, December 4). International Early Learning and Child Well-being Study (IELS) - OECD. Retrieved December 3, 2016, from http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/international-early-learning-and-child-well-being-study.htm
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2017). Early learning matters. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/Early-Learning-Matters-Brochure.pdf
Peters, M. (2001). Education, enterprise culture and the entrepreneurial self: A Foucauldian perspective. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 2(2), 58–71.
Peters, M. A. (2011). Neoliberalism and after?: Education, social policy, and the crisis of Western capitalism. New York: Peter Lang.
Roberts, P. (2004). Neoliberalism, knowledge and inclusiveness. Policy Futures in Education, 2(2), 350–364. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2004.2.2.9
Roberts, P. (2007). Neoliberalism, performativity and research. International Review of Education, 53(4), 349–365.
Roberts, P. (2011). Attention, asceticism, and grace: Simone Weil and higher education. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 10(3), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022211408037
Robinson, K., & Jones-Diaz, C. (2005). Diversity And Difference In Early Childhood Education: Issues For Theory And Practice: n/a. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Saunders, D. B. (2010). Neoliberal ideology and public higher education in the United States. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 8(1), 41–77.
Shugan, S. M. (1984). Price effects on consumer behavior: a status report. In T. C. Kinnear (Ed.), Advances in Consumer Research Volume 11 (pp. 627–632). Provo, Utah, U.S.A.: Association for Consumer Research. Retrieved from http://www.acrwebsite.org/search/view-conference-proceedings.aspx?Id=6321
Smith, A. (2013). Understanding children and childhood: a New Zealand perspective (5th edition). Wellington, New Zealand: Bridget Williams Books.
Smith, L. T. (2007). The native and the neoliberal down under: Neoliberalism and ‘endangered authenticities.’ In Indigenous experience today (pp. 333–352).
Stover, S. (2013). Odd alliances: Working theories on “unintended consequences” of early childhood education in Aotearoa, New Zealand. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 38(3), 4.
Te One, S. (2013). Te Whāriki: Historical accounts and contemporary influences 1990-2012. In J. Nuttall (Ed.), Weaving Te whāriki: Aotearoa New Zealand’s early childhood curriculum framework in theory and practice (2nd ed, pp. 7–34). Wellington, N.Z: NZCER Press.
Urban, M., & Swadener, B. B. (2016). Democratic accountability and contextualised systemic evaluation. A comment on the OECD initiative to launch an International Early Learning Study (IELS). International Critical Childhood Policy Studies Journal, 5(1), 6–18.
Weil, S. (1970). First and last notebooks. London ; New York: Oxford University Press.
Weil, S. (1973). Waiting for God. (Emma Craufurd, Trans.) (1st ed., reprinted.). London: Harper Colophon.
Weil, S. (2002). Gravity and grace. New York: Routledge. Retrieved from http://canterbury.eblib.com.au/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=171376
Wolff, K. (2013). When More is Not More: Consumption and Consumerism within the Neoliberal Early Childhood Assemblage(s). Global Studies of Childhood, 3(3), 328–338. https://doi.org/10.2304/gsch.2013.3.3.328
Yoon, S., Oh, S., Song, S., Kim, K. K., & Kim, Y. (2014). Higher quality or lower price? How value-increasing promotions affect retailer reputation via perceived value. Journal of Business Research, 67(10), 2088–2096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.04.017
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Those reproducing all or part of manuscripts first published in the journal are asked to acknowledge the International Critical Childhood Policy Studies Journal.
