Democratic accountability and contextualised systemic evaluation. A comment on the OECD initiative to launch an International Early Learning Study (IELS)
Keywords:critical policy studies, OECD, The International Early Learning Study (IELS)
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has initiated a process to develop and pilot an international comparative assessment of learning outcomes for young children aged 4.5 to 5.5 years. The International Early Learning Study (IELS) has received little attention from early childhood scholars and practitioners due not least to the absence of a meaningful consultation process. In this paper, written on behalf of the international Reconceptualising Early Childhood (RECE) network, we argue that research evidence that draws large-scale standardised assessment and comparison of young children into question is not taken into account by the proponents of IELS. We express our concern that IELS confirms the OECD’s renunciation of the more contextually sensitive approach to understanding early childhood systems that underpinned earlier studies, in particular Starting Strong I+II. We argue that emerging resistance from the field against decontextualized standardised assessment of children, and the nature of the information gathered will render IELS results largely meaningless for the stated purpose of improving early childhood experiences for all children. The paper concludes with a call for supporting competent systems, democratic accountability and systemic evaluation.
Alexander, R. J. (2000). Other primary schools and ours : hazards of international comparison: University of Warwick, Centre for Research in Elementary and Primary Education.
Bloch, M., Swadener, B. B., & Cannella, G. S. (2014). Reconceptualizing early childhood care and education : critical questions, new imaginaries and social activism: a reader.
New York: Peter Lang.
Madaus, G. F., & Clarke, M. (2001). The adverse impact of high-stakes testing on minority students: Evidence from one hundred years of test data. In G. Orfield & M. L. Kornhaber (Eds.). Raising standards or raising barriers? Inequality and high-stakes testing in public education (pp. 85–106). New York: The Century Foundation Press.
Meisels, S.J. (2004). Should We Test Four -Year Olds? [Commentary]. Pediatrics, 113(5), 1401-1402.
Meisels, S.J. (2006). Accountability in Early Childhood: no easy answers. Occasional Paper 6, March 2006. Chicago: Erikson Institute.
Meisels, S. J., & Atkins-Burnett, S. (2006). Evaluating early childhood assessments: A differential analysis. In K. McCartney & D. Phillips (Eds.), Handbook of Early Childhood Development (pp. 533–549). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Moss, P., Dahlberg, G., Grieshaber, S., Mantovani, S., May, H., Pence, A., . . . Vandenbroeck, M. (2016). The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s International Early Learning Study: Opening for debate and contestation. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 17(3), 343-351. doi:10.1177/1463949116661126
OECD. (2001). Starting Strong. Early Childhood Education and Care. Paris: OECD. OECD. (2006). Starting Strong II. Early Childhood Education and Care. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2008). Growing Unequal. Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2009). Doing Better for Children. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2015). Call for tenders: International Early Learning Study. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/callsfortenders/CfT 100001420 International Early Learning Study.pdf
Penn, H. (2011). Quality in early childhood services : an international perspective.Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.
Pestalozzi-Fröbel Verband, & Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft Elterninitiativen. (2016). The OECD’s International Early Learning Assessment: A statement on Germany’s participation in the OECD survey. Berlin.
Raudenbush, S. (2005). Newsmaker Interview: How NCLB testing can leave some schools behind. Preschool matters, 3(2), Rutgers University: National Institute of Early Education Research.
Romero, R. F., Urban, M., Galvis Vásquez, D. J., Gómez Muñoz, D. P., Zárate Pinto, G. C., Acero Niño, G. A., . . . Ramírez Martinez, P. (2013). Estudio de caracterización de los perfiles, las competencias, las necesidades de cualificación y las condiciones sistémicas de apoyo al trabajo del talento humano que se desempeña en las modalidades de educación inicial (Institucional y familiar). Bogotá, Colombia: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
Schwandt, T. A. (2004). Hermeneutics: a Poetics of Inquiry Versus a Methodology for Research. In H. Piper & I. Stronach (Eds.), Educational research : difference and diversity (pp. 31-44). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Stake, R. E. (2003). Case Studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry (pp. 134-164). London: Sage.
Unwin, A., & Yandell, J. (2016). PISA-envy, Pearson and Starbucks-style schools. New Internationalist(491), 42-43.
United Nations Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007).
Urban, M. (2015a). Compromiso y Responsibilidad de Todos. Europe and Latin America learning from and with each other for Competent Systems in early childhood. Retrieved from http://reciprocamente.eurosocial-ii.eu/en/
Urban, M. (2015b). Starting wrong? A critical perspective on the latest permutation of the debate on the quality of early childhood provision. In M. Matthes, L. Pulkkinen, L. M. Pinto, & C. Clouder (Eds.), Improving the Quality of Childhood in Europe (Vol. 5).Brussels: Alliance for Childhood European Network Foundation.
Urban, M., Vandenbroeck, M., Van Laere, K., Lazzari, A., & Peeters, J. (2011). Competence requirements in early childhood education and care. Final report. Brussels: European Commission. Directorate General for Education and Culture.
Urban, M., Vandenbroeck, M., Van Laere, K., Lazzari, A., & Peeters, J. (2012). Towards Competent Systems in Early Childhood Education and Care. Implications for Policy and Practice. European Journal of Education, 47(4), 508-526. doi:10.1111/ejed.12010
Vandenbroeck, M., Urban, M., & Peeters, J. (Eds.). (2016). Pathways to Professionalism in Early Childhood Education and Care. London and New York: Rutledge.
Working Group on Early Childhood Education and Care. (2014). Proposal for principles of a Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/education/policy/strategic- framework/archive/documents/ecec-quality-framework_en.pdf
LicenseAuthors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Those reproducing all or part of manuscripts first published in the journal are asked to acknowledge the International Critical Childhood Policy Studies Journal.