Visualizing empathy, memory, and identity: a study comparing visual and participatory methods that challenge dominant scopic regimes

Main Article Content

Katherine E. Foo

Abstract

From Boston to Los Angeles, scholars and practitioners are working to improve participatory design and planning through new forms of digital media. Visualization technologies have also become much more prominent in the quotidian operations of urban governance, broadening the scope and methods for public engagement in urban planning projects. Different visual methods powerfully shape people’s perceptions and understandings of urban issues, and broader institutional arrangements further shape the communication potential of visual information. However, little is known about how, specifically, visual information works to foster dialogue and debate in urban design and planning projects. This paper takes an institutional lens to analyze four civic engagement and participatory planning cases in U.S. cities. Digital media considered here include immersive 3D models, social network media, participatory mapping, smartphone, and cheap cellphone-based engagement. Cities include Boston, Acton (MA), Raleigh, and Los Angeles. It concludes that visualization technologies do offer new opportunities for participatory design and planning, while institutional arrangements influence the type of method, the way it is implemented, and its communication impact. Civic organizations, academic institutions, and private funding agencies are important players in the pursuit of social justice in the city. Longstanding relationships between civic organizations and research organizations are more likely to produce visualizations that articulate problems, and responses to problems, articulated by civic organizations.

Article Details

How to Cite
Foo, K. (2018). Visualizing empathy, memory, and identity: a study comparing visual and participatory methods that challenge dominant scopic regimes. Visual Methodologies, 5(2), 35 - 49. Retrieved from https://journals.sfu.ca/vm/index.php/vm/article/view/94
Section
Special Issue: Environmental (In)visibilities (Guest Editor: Valentina Anzoise)
Author Biography

Katherine E. Foo, The Pennsylvania State University

Postdoctoral Scholar

Department of Geography

References

Acton, Massachusetts. city.data.com. http://www.city-data.com/city/Acton-Massachusetts.html Accessed April 29, 2012

Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of planners, 35(4), 216-224.

Asian Community Development Corporation. http://www.asiancdc.org/ Accessed April 29, 2012.

Bartl, Roland and Kristin Alexander. Spring 2010. Telephone Interview.

Beauregard, RA.1989. Between modernity and postmodernity: the ambiguous position of US planning. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 7(4):381-395.

Boone, K. (2015). Disembodied voices, embodied places: Mobile technology, enabling discourse, and interpreting place. Landscape and Urban Planning, 142, 235-242.

Castells, Manuel. (1977). The Urban Question: A Marxist Approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1-72, 115-128, 234-242.

Chan, Janelle. Spring 2010. Personal interview.

Chinatown, Boston, MA. city-data.com. http://www.city-data.com/neighborhood/Chinatown-Boston-MA.html. Accessed April 29, 2012.

Foo, K., Gallagher, E., Bishop, I., & Kim, A. (2015). Critical landscape visualization to LAND SI “Critical Approaches to Landscape Visualization”. Landscape and Urban Planning, 142, 80-84.

Harvey, David. 1978. The urban process under capitalism: A framework for analysis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2:101-131.

Hou, Jeffrey. February 2012. “Participatory Visualization as a Medium for Cross-cultural Learning and Empowerment.” Paper presented at the Association of American geographers, NYC, New York.

Lange, E., & Bishop, I. D. (Eds.). (2005). Visualization in landscape and environmental planning: technology and applications. Taylor & Francis.

Lange, E. (2011). 99 volumes later: We can visualise. Now what?. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100(4), 403-406.

Liu, Jeremy. Spring 2010. Telephone Interview

Lovett, A., Appleton, K., Warren-Kretzschmar, B., & Von Haaren, C. (2015). Using 3D visualization methods in landscape planning: An evaluation of options and practical issues. Landscape and Urban Planning, 142, 85-94.

MacEachren, A. M. (1994). Visualization in modern cartography: setting the agenda. Visualization in modern cartography, 28(1), 1-12.

North, D. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic perspectives, 5(1), 640-655.

Sasaki, David. 200. Mobile Voices and the Ethical Responsibilities of Citizen Journalism Training. http://mediashift.org/2009/03/mobile-voices-and-the-ethical-responsibilities-of-citizen-journalism-training064/

Shaw, A., Sheppard, S., Burch, S., Flanders, D., Wiek, A., Carmichael, J., ... & Cohen, S. (2009). Making local futures tangible—synthesizing, downscaling, and visualizing climate change scenarios for participatory capacity building. Global Environmental Change, 19(4), 447-463.

Song, Jason. January 22, 2012. Bicyclists tour Watts on a CicLAvia Ride. Los Angeles Times http://articles.latimes.com/2012/jan/22/local/la-me-bicycle-map-20120123

South Park, Raleigh, NC. city-data.com. http://www.city-data.com/neighborhood/South-Park-Raleigh-NC.html Accessed April 29, 2012.

St. Clair, Holly. Spring 2010. Personal Interview

Stradling, Richard. 2015. Chavis carousel little used as park awaits redevelopment. News Observer. http://www.newsobserver.com/news/local/counties/wake-county/article36473214.html

Sussman, Ann. Spring 2010. Personal Interview.

VozMob Project Members. (2011). Mobile Voices: projecting the voices of immigrant workers by appropriating mobile phones for popular communication. Communications research in action: scholar-activist collaborations for a democratic public sphere, Donald McGannon Research Center’s Everett C. Parker Book Series Book. Fordham University Press.

VozMob (2010). VozMob. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vL5utjMK8Us&feature=player_embedded.