A Student-Led Methodology for Evaluating Curricular Redundancy

Main Article Content

Kenneth D. Royal
Kurt O. Gilliland
Georgette A. Dent

Abstract

Background: Curricular redundancy can be a significant problem for any educational curriculum. Redundancy can be both desirable and undesirable, but differentiating the two can be quite challenging. Further, pinpointing undesirable redundancy and quantifying it so as to produce an estimate of inefficiency is even more difficult. Purpose: The purpose of this research is to describe a student-led strategy for evaluating redundancy in a highly integrated medical school curriculum. It is our hope that the methodology presented here will serve as a useful evaluation model for persons attempting similar work in various educational arenas. Setting: A highly-integrated medical school at a large public university. Intervention: This research did not require an intervention. Research Design: We identified two advanced medical students and asked them to identify redundant material across the first two years of the medical school curriculum. The students had to operationalize ‘redundancy’, develop an evaluation plan/framework, and evaluate the extent to which undesirable redundancy was prevalent in the current curriculum. Data Collection and Analysis: Students reviewed course syllabi, notes, and materials and documented the amount of redundant material they found in the curriculum. Findings: A total of approximately 167 hours, or 8.35 weeks, could be eliminated from the curriculum; the vast majority of the redundancy occurred as a result of small group activities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Royal, K. D., Gilliland, K. O., & Dent, G. A. (2014). A Student-Led Methodology for Evaluating Curricular Redundancy. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 10(23), 1–8. Retrieved from https://journals.sfu.ca/jmde/index.php/jmde_1/article/view/386
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Kenneth D. Royal, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Director of Evaluation, UNC School of Medicine

Adjunct Associate Professor, Department of Family Medicine

Kurt O. Gilliland, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Assistant Professor, Department of Cell Biology and Physiology at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine

Assistant Dean of Curriculum, UNC School of Medicine

Georgette A. Dent, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Associate Professor, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine

Associate Dean for Student Affairs, UNC School of Medicine