Propaganda in an insecure, unstructured world: How psychological uncertainty and authoritarian attitudes shape the evaluation of right-wing extremist internet propaganda

Authors

  • Diana Rieger PhD, is postdoctoral researcher at the Department of Media and Communication Studies, University of Mannheim (Twitter: @DianaRieger79)
  • Lena Frischlich Postdoctoral researcher at the University of Münster, Department of Communication
  • Gary Bente Michigan State University, Department of Communication

Keywords:

Right-wing extremist videos, internet propaganda, identification

Abstract

The amount of uploaded extremist propaganda on the internet is increasing. In particular, right-wing extremist as well as Islamic extremist groups take advantage of the opportunities presented by the internet to spread their ideas to worldwide masses. Both tackle in-group specific topics and address their audiences in their respective political, national or religious identities. Several factors, such as higher levels of authoritarian value orientations and threatening life situations (such as existential threats or psychological uncertainty) have been found to shape people’s reactions towards radical groups as well as to propaganda. The current study investigated whether the response to extremist propaganda videos (namely, aversion felt for the video and the perceived persuasiveness of the video) is shaped by an individual’s authoritarian attitudes and psychological uncertainty and whether this is a global process or in-group specific. Further, it considered the effects of exposure to extremist propaganda on the identification with one’s in-group. In a laboratory experiment, German students were confronted with a right-wing extremist and an Islamic extremist video after manipulating their level of uncertainty (high vs. low levels of psychological uncertainty).  The results confirmed that the interaction between authoritarianism and psychological uncertainty affected the evaluation of right-wing extremist videos addressing participants’ national in-group. Under conditions of uncertainty, authoritarianism predicted less aversion and a higher persuasiveness of these videos. Further, psychological uncertainty increased the identification with participants’ German nationality, irrespective of authoritarian attitudes. Notably, the effect was in-group bound: The same effect was not found for Islamic extremist propaganda referring to a religious out-group. The results are discussed regarding the potential of propaganda to foster behavioral intentions and engagement in extremist groups in specific threatening situations. 

References

Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. Oxford, England: Harpers.

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 888–918. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.84.5.888

Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass Inc.

Arendt, F. (2015). Effects of right-wing populist political advertising. Journal of Media Psychology, 27, 178–189.

https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000139

Arlin, J., & Benjamin, J. R. (2006). The relationship between right-wing authoritarianism and attitudes toward violence: Further validation of the attitudes toward violence Scale. Social Behavior and Personality, 34(8), 923–926.

Arndt, J., Greenberg, J., Schimel, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (2002). To belong or not to belong, that is the question: Terror management and identification with gender and ethnicity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.83.1.26

Baines, P. R., O’Shaughnessy, N. J., Moloney, K., Richards, B., Butler, S., & Gill, M. (2010). The dark side of political marketing: Islamist propaganda, Reversal Theory and British Muslims. European Journal of Marketing, 44(3/4), 478–495. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561011020543

Branscombe, N. R., & Doosje, B. (2004). Collective guilt: International perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Branscombe, N. R., Fernández, S., Gómez, A., & Cronin, T. (2012). Moving toward or away from a group identity: Different strategies for coping with pervasive discrimination. In J. Jetten, C. Haslam, & A. S. Haslam (Eds.), The social cure: Identity, health and well-being (pp. 115–131). New York, NY, US: Psychology Press.

Briggs, R., & Feve, S. (2013). Review of programs to counter narratives of violent extremism: What works and what are the implications for goverment? Institute for Strategic Dialogue (Vol. July, 2013). London, UK.

Busch, C. (2005). Rechtsradikale Vernetzung im Internet [Radical right-wing networking in the Internet]. WeltTrends, 13(48), 67–68.

Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3, 14–25.

Chirumbolo, A. (2002). The relationship between need for cognitive closure and political orientation: The mediating role of authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32(4), 603–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00062-9

Claus, R., Lehnert, E., & Müller, Y. (2010). Was ein rechter Mann ist- Männlichkeit im Rechtsextremismus [What a right man is- manhood in right-wing extremism]. (Rosa-Luxemburg Stiftung, Ed.). Berlin: Dietz.

Connelly, S., Dunbar, N. E., Jensen, M. L., Griffith, J., Taylor, W. D., Johnson, G., … Mumford, M. D. (2016). Social categorization, moral disengagement, and credibility of ideological group websites. Journal of Media Psychology, 28(1), 16–31. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000138

Crowson, H. M. (2009). Nationalism, internationalism, and perceived UN irrelevance: Mediators of relationships between authoritarianism and support for military aggression as part of the war on terror. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(5), 1137–1162.

Dafnos, A. (2014). Narratives as a means of countering the radical right; Looking into the Trojan T-shirt project. Journal EXIT Deutschland, 3, 156–188.

Decker, O., Kiess, J., & Brähler, E. (2016). Die enthemmte Mitte: Autoritäre und rechtsextreme Einstellungen in Deutschland. Leipzig, Germany: Psychosozialverlag.

Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1998). Guilty by association: When one’s group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(4), 872–886. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.75.4.872

Duckitt, J. (2013). Introduction to the special section on authoritarianism in societal context: The role of threat. International Journal of Psychology : Journal International de Psychologie, 48(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.738298

Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: a dual-process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1861–1893. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00672.x

Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., du Plessis, I., & Birum, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.83.1.75

Eatwell, R. (2006). Community cohesion and cumulative extremism in contemporary Britain. The Political Quarterly, 77(2), 204–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2006.00763.x

Egerton, F. (2011). Jihad in the West: The rise of militant Salafism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ellemers, N. (2001). Individual upward mobility and the perceived legitimacy of intergroup relations. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 205–222). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.

Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, P., & Ouwerkerk, J. W. (1999). Self-categorisation, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(March), 371–389. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199903/05)29:2/3<371::AID-EJSP932>3.0.CO;2-U

Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1997). Sticking together of falling apart: In-group identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 617–626. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.72.3.617

Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002). Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 161–86. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135228

Engelmann, K., Günther, F., Heise, N., Hohmann, F., Irrgang, U., & Schmidt, S. (2010). Muslimische Weblogs. Der Islam im deutschsprachigen Internet [Muslim web-blogs: Islam in the German speaking Internet]. Berlin: Frank & Timme.

English, K., Sweetser, K. D., & Ancu, M. (2011). YouTube-ification of Political Talk: An Examination of Persuasion Appeals in Viral Video. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(6), 733–748. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211398090

Fowler, J., & Kam, C. (2007). Beyond the self: Social identity, altruism, and political participation. Journal of Politics, 69(3), 813–827. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00577.x

Frankenberger, P., Glaser, S., Hofmann, I., & Schneider, C. (2015). Islamismus im Internet, Propaganda, Verstöße, Gegenstrategien [Islamism in the internet, propaganda, violations, counter strategies]. Mainz, Germany: Druckerei Schwalm GmbH.

Frindte, W., Boehnke, K., Kreikenbronn, H., & Wagner, W. (2012). Lebenswelten junger Muslime in Deutschland [Lifeworlds of Young Muslims in Germany]. Berlin, Germany: Bundesministerium des Inneren.

Frischlich, L., Rieger, D., Morten, A., & Bente, G. (Eds.) in cooperation with the Federal Criminal Police Office, Department Terrorism/Extremism (in press). Videos gegen Extremismus? „Counter-Narrative“ auf dem Prüfstand [Videos against extremism? "Counter-Narratives" being put to test]. Luchterhand.

Frischlich, L., Rieger, D., Hein, M., & Bente, G. (2015). Dying the right-way? Interest in and perceived persuasiveness of parochial extremist propaganda increases after mortality salience. Frontiers in Psychology: Evolutionary Psychology and Neuroscience, 6(1222). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01222

Frischlich, L., Rieger, D., Rutkowski, O., & Bente, G. (2015). Escaping the brown shadows: Right-wing propaganda motivates dissociation from ones national in-group and turning towards alternative identities. Paper presented at the 65th Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association (ICA). San Juan, Puerto Rico.

Fuchs, M. (2003). Rechtsextremismus von Jugendlichen: Zur Erklärungskraft verschiedener theoretischer Konzepte [Right-wing extremism of young adults: Explanative power of different theoretical concepts]. Kölner Zeitschrift Für Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie, 55(4), 654–678. doi: 10.1007/s11577-003-0116-3

Gatto, J., & Dambrun, M. (2012). Authoritarianism, social dominance, and prejudice among junior police officers. Social Psychology, 43(2), 61–66. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000081

Gatto, J., Kerbrat, C., & Oliveira, P. D. E. (2010). Prejudice in the police: On the processes underlying the effects of selection. European Journal of Social Psychology, 269(January 2009), 252–269. doi: 10.1002/ejsp

Glaser, S. (2013). Rechtsextremismus online [Right-wing extremism online]. Mainz, Germany: Druckerei Bunter Hund.

Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103, 336–355.

Hegghammer, T. (2006). Terrorist recruitment and radicalization in Saudi Arabia. Middle East Policy, 13(4), 39–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4967.2006.00269.x

Hodson, G., & Busseri, M. (2012). Bright minds and dark attitudes: lower cognitive ability predicts greater prejudice through right-wing ideology and low intergroup contact. Psychological Science, 23(2), 187–195. doi: 10.1177/0956797611421206

Hoffmann, B. (2006). Terrorismus- der unerklärte Krieg [Terrorism- the unexplained war]. Frankfurt, Germany: Fischer.

Hogg, M. A. (2000). Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 223–255.

Hogg, M. A. (2014). From uncertainty to extremism: Social categorization and identity processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(5), 338–342. doi: 10.1177/0963721414540168

Hogg, M. A., Adelman, J. R., & Blagg, R. D. (2010). Religion in the face of uncertainty: an uncertainty-identity theory account of religiousness. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 72–83. doi: 10.1177/1088868309349692

Hogg, M. A., Meehan, C., & Farquharson, J. (2010). The solace of radicalism: Self-uncertainty and group identification in the face of threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1061–1066. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.005

Hogg, M. A., Sherman, D. K., Dierselhuis, J., Maitner, A. T., & Moffitt, G. (2007). Uncertainty, entitativity, and group identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 135–142. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.12.008

Holtz, P., Kronberger, N., & Wagner, W. (2012). Analyzing internet forums: A practical guide. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 24(2), 55–66.

Huddy, L., & Khatib, N. (2007). American patriotism, national identity, and political involvement. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 63–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00237.x

Hussain, G., & Saltman, E. M. (2014). Jihad trending: A comprehensive analysis of online extremism and how to counter it. Quiliam Foundation.

Johns, M., Schmader, T., & Lickel, B. (2005). Ashamed to be an American? The role of identification in predicting vicarious shame for anti-Arab prejudice after 9–11. Self and Identity, 4(4), 331–348. doi: 10.1080/15298860500145822

Jowett, G. S., & O’Donnell, V. (2012). Propaganda & Persuasion. Los Angeles, London, New Dehli, Singapore, Washinton D.C.: SAGE.

Kruglanski, A. W., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., & De Grada, E. (2006). Groups as epistemic providers: Need for closure and the unfolding of group-centrism. Psychological Review, 113(1), 84–100. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.1.84

Lewis, A. C., & Sherman, S. J. (2010). Perceived entitativity and the black-sheep effect: When will we denigrate negative ingroup members? The Journal of Social Psychology, 150(2), 211–25. doi: 10.1080/00224540903366388

Marques, J. M., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Leyens, J.-P. (1988). The “black sheep effect ”: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420180102

Mullin, B.-A., & Hogg, M. A. (1998). Dimensions of subjective uncertainty in social identification and minimal intergroup discrimination. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 345–365.

O´Shaughnessy, N. (2012). The death and life of propaganda. Journal of Public Affairs, 12(1), 29–38. doi: 10.1002/pa

Oesterreich, D. (2005). Flight into security: A new approach and measure of the authoritarian personality. Political Psychology, 26(2), 275–297.

Payne, K. (2009). Winning the battle of ideas: Propaganda, ideology, and terror. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 32(2), 109–128. doi: 10.1080/10576100802627738

Petzel, T., Wagner, U., Nicolai, K., & Van Dick, R. (1997). Ein kurzes Instrument zur Messung der Autoritarismus-Neigung [A short instrument for measuring authoritarianism]. Gruppendynamik, 28, 251–258.

Pfeiffer, T. (2003). „Das Internet ist billig, schnell und sauber. Wir lieben es“, Rechtsextremisten entdecken den Computer [”The Internet is cheap, fast, and clean. We love it". Right-wing extremists discover the computer.]. Retrieved from www.im.nrw.de/ sch/35.htm

Platt, S. (1989). Respectfully quoted: A dictionary of quotations requested from the Congressional Research Service. Washington, DC: USA: Library of Congress.

Puschnerat, T. (2006). Zur Bedeutung ideologischer und sozialer Faktoren in islamistischen Radikalisierungsprozessen – eine Skizze. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen einer prognostischen Empirie [On the relevance of ideological and social factors in Islamist radicalization processes]. In U. Kemmesies (Ed.), Terrorismus und Extremismus – der Zukunft auf der Spur. Beiträge zur Entwicklungsdynamik von Terrorismus und Extremismus [Terrorism and extremism - to be on track of the future. Contributions to the development dyanmics of terrorism and extremism] (pp. 217–235). München: Wolters Kluwer Deutschland GmbH.

Reese, G., & Lauenstein, O. (2014). The eurozone crisis: Psychological mechanisms undermining and supporting European solidarity. Social Sciences, 3(1), 160–171. doi: 10.3390/socsci3010160

Reid, S. A., & Hogg, M. A. (2005). Uncertainty reduction, selfenhancement, and ingroup identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 804–817.

Rieger, D., Frischlich, L., & Bente, G. (2013). Propaganda 2.0: Psychological effects of right-wing and Islamic extremist internet videos. (German Federal Criminal Police Office Institute of Law Enforcement Studies and Training, Ed.). Cologne, Germany: Wolters Kluwer Deutschland GmbH.

Rogan, H. (2007). Al-Qaeda ’ s online media strategies: From Abu Reuter to Irhabi. Norwegian Defence Research Establishment (FFI).

Rothschild, Z. K., Abdollahi, A., & Pyszczynski, T. (2009). Does peace have a prayer? The effect of mortality salience, compassionate values, and religious fundamentalism on hostility toward out-groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 816–827. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.05.016

Sageman. (2008). Leaderless Jihad - Terror Networks in the 21st Century. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania.

Schlamp, H.-J. (2015, February 25). Europa glaubt nicht mehr an Europa [Europe does not believe in Europe]. Spiegel Online. Hamburg; Germany. Retrieved from www.spiegel.de

Seib, P., & Janbek, D. M. (2011). Global terrorism and new media. New York, USA: Routledge.

Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review : An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 12(3), 248–79. doi: 10.1177/1088868308319226

Spiegel Online. (2015, October 9). Verfassungsschutz warnt vor rechten Hasskampagnen, pp. 14–15. Hamburg; Germany. Retrieved from www.spiegel.de

Stern, J., & Berger, J. M. (2016). ISIS: The State of Terror (2nd ed.). London, UK: Ecco.

Terry, D., & Hogg, M. (1996). Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(8), 776–793.

UNHCR. (2014). World at War: UNHCR Global Trends Foced Displacement 2014. Berlin, Germany. Retrieved from http://www.unhcr.de/service/zahlen-und-statistiken.html

Weichert, S. A. (2007). Die Propaganda der Tat–Zur Kommunikationsstrategie des modernen Aufmerksamkeitsterrorismus [Propaganda of the deed - On the communication strategy of modern attention-grabbing terrorism]. In S. Glaab (Ed.), Medien und Terrorismus. Auf den Spuren einer Symbiotischen Beziehung [Media and terrorism. On the traces of a symbiotic relationship] (pp. 83–98). Berlin: Berliner Wissenschaftsverlag.

Weimann, G. (2006). Terror on the Internet. Washington, D.C., USA: United States Institute of Peace.

Yzerbyt, V., Castano, E., Leyens, J.-P., & Paladino, M.-P. (2000). The primacy of the ingroup: The interplay of entitativity and identification. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 257–295.

Downloads

Published

2017-03-24

Issue

Section

Articles