Conflict Management, Transitional Justice and De-radicalization – Different, but common goals
Keywords:disengagement, de-radicalization, reconciliation, negotiations, amnesties
The aim of this working paper is to explore common issues between the process of reconciliation in post-conflict societies, negotiations and the renouncement of violent means. This paper brings forward the argument that reconciliation, negotiations as well as disengagement or de-radicalization processes are important for a non-violent communication between extremists and the society they should re-integrate. Re-opening communication channels after terrorist violence can help to build trust and chance former conflict party’s mindsets. Comparing the principles of victim-oriented instruments of transitional justice to the disengagement process of perpetrators demonstrates some reasons for successful collective disengagement. Furthermore, especially amnesties, ore milder punishment are important incentives for negotiations and disengagement. This is often evaluated as unjust by victims and may suppress a further truth-finding process. Choosing completive restorative justice instruments like public apologies and public discussions in truth-finding processes can increase justice for victims and makes de-radicalization processes more lasting.
Alonso, R. (2011) Why Do Terrorists Stop?: Analyzing Why ETA Members Abandon or Continue with Terrorism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 34 (9), 696–716.
Alonso, R. & Bada, J. D. (2016) What Role Have Former ETA Terrorists Played in Counterterrorism and Counterradicalization Initiatives in Spain? Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 39 (11), 982–1006.
Altier, M. B., Thoroughgood, C. N. & Horgan, J. G. (2014) Turning away from terrorism: Lessons from psychology, sociology, and criminology. Journal of Peace Research 51 (5), 647–661.
Ashour, O. (2008) De-Radicalization of Jihad?: The Impact of Egyptian Islamist Revisionists on Al-Qaeda. Perspectives on Terrorism 5 (2), 11-14.
Auerbach, Y. (2009) The Reconciliation Pyramid-A Narrative-Based Framework for Analyzing Identity Conflicts. Political Psychology 30 (2), 291–318.
Barelle, K. (2015) Pro-Integration: Disengagement from and life after extremism. Behavioral Science of Terrorism and Political Aggression.
Barrile, L. G. (2015) I Forgive You, but You Must Die: Murder Victim Family Members, the Death Penalty, and Restorative Justice. Victims & Offenders 10 (3), 239–269.
Bar-Tal, D. (2000) From Intractable Conflict Through Conflict Resolution To Reconciliation: Psychological Analysis. Political Psychology 21 (2), 351–365.
Bazemore, G. (1998) Restorative Justice and Earned Redemtion: Communities, Victims, and Offender Reintegration. American Behavioral Scientist 41 (6), 768–813.
Bertram, L. (2015) How Could a Terrorist be De-Radicalised? Journal for Deradicalization (5), 120–149.
Bjørgo, T. & Horgan, J. (2009) Introduction. In: Bjørgo, T. & Horgan, J. (eds.) Leaving terrorism behind: Disengagement from political violence. Routledge, London, pp. 1–13.
Brannan, D. W., Esler, P. F. & Strindberg, N. T. Anders (2001) Talking to "Terrorists": Towards an Independent Analytical Framework for the Study of Violent Substate Activism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 24 (1), 3–24.
Buckley-Zistel, S. & Oettler (2011) Was bedeutut Transitional Justice? In: Buckley-Zistel, S. & Kater, T. (eds.) Nach Krieg, Gewalt und Repression: Vom schwierigen Umgang mit der Vergangenheit, 1. Aufl. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp. 21–38.
Byman, D. (2009) Talking with Insurgents: A Guide for the Perplexed. The Washington Quarterly 32 (2), 125–137.
Clubb, G. (2014) "From Terrorists to Peacekeepers": The IRA's disengagement and the role of community networks. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 37 (10), 842–861.
Clubb, G. (2016) The Role of Former Combatants in Preventing Youth Involvement in Terrorism in Northern Ireland: A Framework for Assessing Former Islamic State Combatants. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 39 (9), 842–861.
Cronin, A. K. (2009) How terrorism ends: Understanding the decline and demise of terrorist campaigns. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Dalgaard-Nielsen, A. (2013) Promoting Exit from Violent Extremism: Themes and Approaches. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 36 (2), 99–115.
Daly, K. (2016) What is Restorative Justice?: Fresh Answers to a Vexed Question. Victims & Offenders 11 (1), 9–29.
El-Said, H. (2012) De-Radicalising Islamists: Programmes and their Impact in Muslim Majority States. Developments in Radicalisation and Political Violence.
Ferguson, N. (2016) Disengaging from Terrorism: A Northern Irish Experience. Journal for Deradicalization 6, 1–23.
Ferguson, N., Burgess, M. & Hollywood, I. (2015) Leaving Violence Behind: Disengaging from Politically Motivated Violence in Northern Ireland. Political Psychology 36 (2), 199–214.
Ghosn, F. (2010) Getting to the Table and Getting to Yes: An Analysis of International Negotiations1. International Studies Quarterly 54 (4), 1055–1072.
Gibson, J. L. (2002) Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation: Judging the Fairness of Amnesty in South Africa. American Journal of Political Science 46 (3), 540–556.
Goerzig, C. (2012) Talking to terrorists: Concessions and the renunciation of violence. Routledge, London.
Govier, T. & Verwoerd, W. (2002) Trust and the Problem of National Reconciliation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (2), 178–205.
Gromet, D. M. & Darley, J. M. (2006) Restoration and Retribution: How Including Retributive Components Affects the Acceptability of Restorative Justice Procedures. Social Justice Research 19 (4), 395–432.
Hamber, B. (2007) Forgiveness and Reconciliation: Paradise Lost or Pragmatism? Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 13 (1), 115–125.
Hoffman, B. (2006) Terrorismus, der unerklärte Krieg: Neue Gefahren politischer Gewalt, Erw. und aktualisierte Ausg. Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, Bonn.
Horgan, J. (2008) Deradicalization or Disengagement?: A Process in Need of Clarity and a Counterterrorism Inititative in Need of Evaluation. Perspectives on Terrorism 11 (4), 3–8.
Horgan, J. (2009) Individual Disengagement: A psychological analysis. In: Bjørgo, T. & Horgan, J. (eds.) Leaving terrorism behind: Disengagement from political violence. Routledge, London, pp. 17–29.
Horgan, J., Altier, M. B., Shortland, N. & Taylor, M. (2016) Walking away: The disengagement and de-radicalization of a violent right-wing extremist. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 1–15.
Horgan, J. & Braddock, K. (2010) Rehabilitating the Terrorists?: Challenges in Assessing the Effectiveness of De-radicalization Programs. Terrorism and Political Violence 22 (2), 267–291.
Humphrey, M. (2012) Marginalizing "victims" and "terrorists": modes of exclusion in the reconciliation process. In: Renner, J. & Spencer, A. (eds.) Reconciliation after terrorism: Strategy, possibility or absurdity? Routledge, London, New York, pp. 48–67.
Joffé, G. (2008) National Reconciliation and General Amnesty in Algeria. Mediterranean Politics 13 (2), 213–228.
Jones, P. (2015) Talking with al Qaeda: Is There a Role for Track Two? International Negotiation 20 (2), 177–198.
Kaminski, M. M., Nalepa, M. & O'neill, B. (2006) Normative and Strategic Aspects of Transitional Justice. Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (3), 295–302.
Kaminski, S., Beres, S. & Hayes, R. (2003) Negotiating the Non-Negotiable: Dealing with Absolutist Terrorists. International Negotiation 8 (3), 451–467.
Knight, M. & Özerdem, A. (2004) Guns, Camps and Cash: Disarmament, Demobilization and Reinsertion of Former Combatants in Transitions from War to Peace. Journal of Peace Research 41 (4), 499–516.
Lankford, A. & Gillespie, K. (2011) Rehabilitating Terrorists Through Counter-Indoctrination: Lessons Learned From The Saudi Arabian Program. International Criminal Justice Review 21 (2), 118–133.
Miller, C. (2011) Is it Possible and Preferable to Negotiate with Terrorists? Defence Studies 11 (1), 145–185.
Misra, A. (2008) Politics of civil wars: Conflict, intervention and resolution. Routledge, London, New York.
Moghadam, A., Berger, R. & Beliakova, P. (2014) Say Terrorist, Think Insurgent: Labeling and Analyzing Contemporary Terrorist Actors. Perspectives on Terrorism 8 (5), 1–17.
Mullins, S. (2010) Rehabilitation of Islamist terrorists: Lessons from criminology. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict 3 (3), 162–193.
Neumann, P. R. (2007) Negotiating With Terrorists. Foreign Affairs 86 (1), 128–138.
Neumann, P. R. (2013) The trouble with radicalization. International Affairs 89 (4), 873–893.
Olson Lounsbery, M. & Cook, A. H. (2011) Rebellion, mediation, and group change: An empirical investigation of competing hypotheses. Journal of Peace Research 48 (1), 73–84.
Pecastaing, C. (2011) Facing Terrorism: Engagement and De-escalation. In: Zartman, I. W. & Faure, G. O. (eds.) Engaging extremists: Trade-offs, timing, and diplomacy. United States Institute of Peace Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 169–202.
Pettyjohn, S. L. (2011) U.S. Policy toward Nationalist Terrorist Organizations: Isolate or Engage? In: Zartman, I. W. & Faure, G. O. (eds.) Engaging extremists: Trade-offs, timing, and diplomacy. United States Institute of Peace Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 137–162.
Phayal, A., Khadka, P. B. & Thyne, C. L. (2015) What Makes an Ex-Combatant Happy?: A Micro-Analysis of Disarmament, Demobilization, and Reintegration in South Sudan. International Studies Quarterly, 654–668.
Pruitt, D. G. (2006) Negotiation with Terrorists. International Negotiation 11 (2), 371–392.
Pruitt, D. G. (2008) Back-channel Communication in the Settlement of Conflict. International Negotiation 13 (1), 37–54.
Rabasa, A., Pettyjohn, S. L., Ghez, J. J. & Boucek, C. (2011) Deradicalizing Islamist extremists. RAND, Santa Monica, CA.
Rashwan, D. (2009) The renunciation of violence by Egyptian Jihadi organizations. In: Bjørgo, T. & Horgan, J. (eds.) Leaving terrorism behind: Individual and collective disengagement. Routledge, London, New York, pp. 113–131.
Renner, J. & Spencer, A. (2012a) Introduction: Reconciling the seemingly irreconcilable? In: Renner, J. & Spencer, A. (eds.) Reconciliation after terrorism: Strategy, possibility or absurdity? Routledge, London, New York, pp. 1–23.
Renner, J. & Spencer, A. (eds.) (2012b) Reconciliation after terrorism: Strategy, possibility or absurdity? Routledge, London, New York.
Renner, J. & Spencer, A. (2013) De-antagonising the Other: Changing Constructions of the Taliban and the Possibility of Reconciliation. Global Society 27 (4), 475–496.
Schmid, A. P. (2012) Strengthening the Role of Victims and Incorporating Victims in Efforts to Counter Violent Extremism and Terrorism. Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism Studies.
Schmid, A. P. (2014) Al-Qaeda's "Single Narrative" and Attempts to Develop Counter-Narratives: The State of Knowledge. Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism Studies.
Stedman, S. J. (1997) Spoiler Problems in Peace Processes. International Security 22 (2), 5–53.
Toros, H. (2008) `We Don't Negotiate with Terrorists!': Legitimacy and Complexity in Terrorist Conflicts. Security Dialogue 39 (4), 407–426.
Toros, H. (2012) Terrorism, talking and transformation: A critical approach. Routledge, London, New York.
Volpi, F. (2003) Islam and democracy: The failure of dialogue in Algeria. Pluto Press, London, Sterling, VA.
Wanis-St. John, A. (2006) Back-Channel Negotiation: International Bargaining in the Shadows. Negotiation Journal 22 (2), 119–144.
Wenzel, M., Okimoto, T. G., Feather, N. T. & Platow, M. J. (2008) Retributive and restorative justice. Law and human behavior 32 (5), 375–389.
Zartman, I. W. (2008) Negotiation and conflict management: Essays on theory and practice. Routledge, London, New York.
The JD Journal for Deradicalization uses a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND) Licence. You are free to share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under the following conditions:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, andindicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.