Is the World Run by Evil Forces? Conspiracy Mentality Among Adolescents in Relation to Right-Wing Extremist Ideology and Discriminatory Behavior
Keywords:
Right-wing Extremism, Discrimination, Adolescents, Conspiracy Mentality, GermanyAbstract
In conspiracy narratives, certain individuals or groups are identified as solely responsible for important social problems. The belief in such narratives shares many similarities with political extremism in general and an integral part of a conspiracy theory— that the world is run by evil forces— is also found in far-right rhetoric. Although conspiracy beliefs have typically been studied in adult populations, adolescents constitute a group that may be particularly susceptible to these ideologies. Therefore, this study aims to examine conspiracy mentality as well as association with a right-wing extremist ideology (RWEI) and discriminatory behaviors toward foreign and homosexual persons among adolescents. The present study uses data from 2,824 students of different educational backgrounds (mean age 15) from Germany to investigate this relationship. Results indicate that adolescents believe in conspiracy theories to a lesser degree than adults in similar studies. It is further established that the higher the conspiracy mentality, the more adolescents share a right-wing extremist ideology. A significant association between conspiracy mentality and discriminatory behavior is also found in the 9th grade, but not in the 7th. Moreover, a conspiracy mentality moderates the established relationship between RWEI and discriminatory behavior at this grade level. Johnson-Neyman plots indicate that a conspiracy mentality already amplifies the effect of RWEI on discriminatory behavior toward foreign persons when adolescents attribute an average probability of 10% or more to the various conspiracy myths (30% for discrimination against homosexual persons). This illustrates that even a rather weakly developed conspiracy mentality can strengthen this attitude-behavior relationship.
The school survey was funded by the Ministry of the Interior in Schleswig-Holstein. No conditions were imposed with the financing.
References
Abalakina-Paap, M., Stephan, W. G., Craig, T., & Gregory, W. L. (1999). Beliefs in conspiracies. Political Psychology, 20(3), 637-647. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00160
Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D., & Sanford, N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York, NY: Haper.
Ajzen, I. (1985). From Intentions to Actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control (pp. 11-39). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA: Prentice-Hall.
Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom. Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Amadeu Antonio Stiftung (2021). Down the rabbit hole. Verschwörungsideologien: Basiswissen und Handlungsstrategien. https://www.amadeu-antonio-stiftung.de/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/DownTheRabbitHole_web.pdf
Baier, D., & Manzoni, P. (2020). Verschwörungsmentalität und Extremismus – Befunde aus Befragungsstudien in der Schweiz. Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform, 103(2), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1515/mks-2020-2044
Bartlett, J., & Miller, C. (2010). The power of unreason. Conspiracy theories, extremism and counter-terrorism. London: Demos.
Berinsky, A. J. (2017). Rumors and health care reform: Experiments in political misinformation. British Journal of Political Science, 47(2), 241-262. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123415000186
Berry, W. D, DeMeritt, J. H. R., & Esarey, J. (2010). Testing for interaction in binary logit and probit models: Is a product term essential? American Journal of Political Science, 54(1), 248-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00429.x
Bilewicz, M., Winiewski, M., Kofta, M., & Wójcik, A. (2013). Harmful ideas, the structure and consequences of anti-semitic beliefs in Poland. Political Psychology, 34(6), 821-839. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12024
Braddock, K. (2022). Vaccinating against hate: Using attitudinal inoculation to confer resistance to persuasion by extremist propaganda. Terrorism and Political Violence, 34(2), 240-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2019.1693370
Brouillette-Alarie, S., Hassan, G., Varela, W., Ousman, S., Kilinc, D., Savard, É. L., . . . Rousseau, C. (2022). Systematic review on the outcomes of primary and secondary prevention programs in the field of violent radicalization. Journal for Deradicalization, Spring(30), 117-168.
Bruder, M., Haffke, P., Neave, N., Nouripanah, N., & Imhoff, R. (2013). Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy mentality questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 225. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00225
Carthy, S. L., Doody, C. B., Cox, K., O'Hora, D., & Sarma, K. M. (2020). Counter-narratives for the prevention of violent radicalisation: A systematic review of targeted interventions. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 16(3), e1106. https://doi.irg/10.1002/cl2.1106
Castanho Silva, B., Vegetti, F., & Littvay, L. (2017). The elite is up to something: Exploring the relation between populism and belief in conspiracy theories. Swiss Political Science Review, 23(4), 423-443. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12270
Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98-104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
Crandall, C. S., & Eshleman, A. (2005). The justification-suppression model of prejudice: An approach to the history of prejudice research. In C. S. Crandall & M. Schaller (Eds.), Social psychology of prejudice: Historical and contemporary issues (pp. 237–267). Lewinian Press.
Decker, O., & Brähler, E. (2006). Vom Rand zur Mitte. Rechtsextreme Einstellungen und ihre Einflussfaktoren in Deutschland. Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Forum Berlin.
Decker, O., Kiess, J., Schuler, J., Handke, B., Pickel, G. & Brähler, E. (2020). Die Leipziger Autoritarismus Studie 2020: Methode, Ergebnisse und Langzeitverlauf. In O. Decker & E. Brähler (Eds.), Autoritäre Dynamiken. Alte Ressentiments – neue Radikalität (1st ed., pp. 27-87). Gießen: Psychosozial-Verlag.
Degner, J., & Dalege, J. (2013). The apple does not fall far from the tree, or does it? A metaanalysis of parent-child similarity in intergroup attitudes. Psychological Bulletin 139(6), 1270–1304. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031436
Douglas, K., Sutton, R. M., Callan, M. J., Dawtry, R. J., & Harvey, A. J. (2016). Someone is pulling the strings: Hypersensitive agency detection and belief in conspiracy theories. Thinking and Reasoning, 22(1), 57-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.1051586
Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., & Cichocka, A. (2017). The psychology of conspiracy theories. Current directions in Psychological Science, 26(6), 538-542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417718261
Dovidio, J. F., Brigham, J. C., Johnson, B. T., & Gaertner, S. L. (1996). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination: Another look. In C. N. Macrae, C. Stangor & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 1276-1319). New York, NY: Guilford.
Dyrendal, A., & Jolley, D. (2020). Conspiracy theories in the classroom: Problems and potential solutions. Religions, 11(10), 494. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11100494
Dyrendal, A., Kennair, L. E. O., Bendixen, M. (2021). Predictors of belief in conspiracy theory: The role of individual differences in schizotypal traits, paranormal beliefs, social dominance orientation, right wing authoritarianism and conspiracy mentality. Personality and Individual Differences, 173, 110645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110645
Edelson, J., Alduncin, A., Krewson, C., Sieja, J. A., & Uscinski, J. E. (2017). The effect of conspiratorial thinking and motivated reasoning on belief in election fraud. Political Research Quarterly, 70(4), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912917721061
Einstein, K. L., & Glick, D. M. (2015). Do I think BLS data are BS? The consequences of conspiracy theories. Political Behavior, 37, 679-701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-014-9287-z
El-Mafaalani, A. (2017). Diskriminierung von Menschen mit Migrationshintergrund. In A. Scherr, A. El-Mafaalani & G. Yüksel (Eds.), Handbuch Diskriminierung (pp. 465-478). Wiesbaden: Springer.
Galliford, N., & Furnham, A. (2017). Individual difference factors and beliefs in medical and political conspiracy theories. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 58(5), 422-428. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12382
Goertzel, T. (1994). Belief in conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 15(4), 731-742. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791630
Golec de Zavala, A., & Cichocka, A. (2012). Collective narcissism and anti-Semitism in Poland. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(2), 213-229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211420891
Gomila, R. (2021). Logistic or linear? Estimating causal effects of experimental treatments on binary outcomes using regression analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(4), 700-709. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000920
Grzesiak-Feldman, M., & Irzycka, M. (2009). Right-wing authoritarianism and conspiracy thinking in a Polish sample. Psychological Reports, 105(2), 389-393. https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.105.2.389-393
Hartman, T. K., Marshall, M., Stocks, T. V. A., McKay, R., Bennett, K., Butter, S., Gibson Miller, J., Hyland, P., Levita, L., Martinez, A. P., Mason, L., McBride, O., Murphy, J., Shevlin, M., Vallières, F., & Bentall, R. P. (2021). Different conspiracy theories Have different psychological and social determinants: Comparison of three theories about the origins of the COVID-19 virus in a representative sample of the UK population. Frontiers in Political Science, 3:642510. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.642510
Haselbach, S., Beckmann, L., Kliem, S., & Krieg, Y. (under review). Intergenerational similarity of Far Right-Wing Attitudes and the Role of Contact with Ethnic Minority Peers.
Hellevik, O. (2009). Linear versus logistic regression when the dependent variable is a dichotomy. Qual Quant, 43, 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9077-3
Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications. London: Routledge.
Imhoff, R. (2015). Beyond (right-wing) authoritarianism: Conspiracy mentality as an incremental predictor of prejudice. In M. Bilewicz, A. Cichocka, & W. Soral (Eds.), The psychology of conspiracy (pp. 122-141). London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Imhoff, R., & Bruder, M. (2014). Speaking (un-)truth to power: Conspiracy mentality as a generalised political attitude. European Journal of Personality, 28(1), 25-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1930
Imhoff, R., & Decker, O. (2013). Verschwörungsmentalität als Weltbild. In O. Decker, J. Kiess & E. Brähler (Eds.), Rechtsextremismus der Mitte. Eine sozialpsychologische Gegenwartsdiagnose (pp. 146-159). Gießen: Psychosozial Verlag.
Imhoff, R. & Lamberty, P. (2018). How paranoid are conspiracy believers? Towards a more fine-grained understanding of the connect and disconnect between paranoia and belief in conspiracy theories. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(7), 909-926. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2494
Imhoff, R., Zimmer, F., Klein, O. et al. (2022). Conspiracy mentality and political orientation across 26 countries. Nature Human Behavior, 6, 392-403. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01258-7
Jagodzinski, W., & Klein, M. (1997). Interaktionseffekte in logistischen und linearen Regressionsmodellen und in CHAID: zum Einfluß von Politikverdrossenheit und Rechtsextremismus auf die Wahl der Republikaner. ZA-Information / Zentralarchiv für Empirische Sozialforschung, 41, 33-57.
Jasko, K., LaFree, G., Piazza, J., & Becker, M. H. (2022). A comparison of political violence by left-wing, right-wing, and Islamist extremists in the United States and the world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(30), e2122593119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2122593119
JIM (2022). JIM-Studie 2021. Jugend, Information, Medien. Basisuntersuchung zum Medienumgang 12- bis 19-Jähriger. Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest: Stuttgart. https://www.mpfs.de/fileadmin/files/Studien/JIM/2021/JIM-Studie_2021_barrierefrei.pdf
Johnson, P. O., & Neyman, J. (1936). Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their application to some educational problems. Statistical Research Memoirs, 1, 57–39.
Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014). The social consequences of conspiracism: Exposure to conspiracy theories decreases intentions to engage in politics and to reduce one's carbon footprint. British Journal of Psychology, 105(1), 35-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12018
Jolley, D., Douglas, K. M., Skipper, Y., Thomas, E., & Cookson, D. (2021). Measuring adolescent conspiracy beliefs questionnaire (ACBQ). British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 39(3), 499-520. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12368
Jolley, D., Meleady, R., & Douglas, K. M. (2020). Exposure to intergroup conspiracy theories promotes prejudice which spreads across groups. British Journal of Psychology, 111(1), 17-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12385
Jones, K. P., Sabat, I. E., King, E. B., Ahmad, A., McCausland, T. C., & Chen, T. (2017). Isms and schisms: A meta-analysis of the prejudice-discrimination relationship across racism, sexism, and ageism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(7), 1076–1110. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2187
Jugert, P., Eckstein, K., Beelmann, A., & Noack, P. (2016). Parents’ influence on the development of their children’s ethnic intergroup attitudes: a longitudinal analysis from middle childhood to early adolescence. European Journal of Developmental Psychology 13(2), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2015.1084923
Klein, M., Heckert, F., & Peper, Y. (2018). Rechtspopulismus oder rechter Verdruss? Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 70, 391-417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-018-0564-4
Kofta, M., & Sedek, G. (2005). Conspiracy stereotypes of jews during systemic transformation in Poland. International Journal of Sociology, 35(1), 40-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2005.11043142
Köllisch, T., & Oberwittler, D. (2004). Wie ehrlich berichten Jugendliche über ihr delinquentes Verhalten? Ergebnisse einer externen Validierung selbstberichteter Delinquenz auf Individual- und Aggregatdatenebene. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 56, 708-735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-004-0110-4
Krouwel, A., Kutiyski, Y., Van Prooijen, J.-W., Martinsson, J., & Elias Markstedt (2017). Does extreme political ideology predict conspiracy beliefs, economic evaluations and political trust? Evidence from Sweden. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 5 (2), 435-462. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v5i2.745
Krieg, Y., Beckmann, L., & Kliem, S. (2019). Regionalanalyse Rechtsextremismus in Schleswig-Holstein 2018. (KFN-Forschungsberichte No. 149). Hannover: KFN.
Krieg, Y. (2022). The role of the social environment in the relationship between group-focused enmity towards social minorities and politically motivated crime. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 74, 65-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-022-00818-7
Küpper, B., Zick A., & Rump, M. (2021). Rechtsextreme Einstellungen in der Mitte 2020/21. In A. Zick & B. Küpper (Eds.)., Die geforderte Mitte. Rechtsextreme und demokratiegefährdende Einstellungen in Deutschland 2020/2021 (pp. 75-111). Bonn: J. H. W. Dietz.
Lamberty, P. K, & Leiser, D. (2019). »Sometimes you just have to go in « – The link between conspiracy beliefs and political action. Unpublished. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bdrxc
Long, J. S., & Ervin, L. H. (2000). Using heteroscedasticity consistent standard errors in the linear regression model. The American Statistician, 54(3), 217-224. https://doi.org/10.2307/2685594
Marchi, R. (2012). With Facebook, blogs, and fake news, teens reject journalistic “objectivity”. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 36(3), 246-262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859912458700
McGrew, S., Breakstone, J., Ortega, T., Smith, M., & Wineburg, S. (2018). Can students evaluate online sources? Learning from assessments of civic online reasoning. Theory & Research in Social Education, 46(2), 165-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2017.1416320
McGuire W. J. (1961). The effectiveness of supportive and refutational defenses in immunizing and restoring beliefs against persuasion. Sociometry 24, 184–197. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786067
Milošević Đorđević, J., Žeželj, I., & Đurić, Ž. (2021). Beyond general political attitudes: Conspiracy mentality as a global belief system predicts endorsement of international and local conspiracy theories. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 9(1), 144-158. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.5609
Mood, C. (2010). Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. European Sociological Review, 26(1), 67-82. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp006
Moscovici, S. (1987). The conspiracy mentality. In C.F. Graumann & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Changing conceptions of conspiracy. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4618-3_9
Nera, K., Wagner-Egger, P., Bertin, P., Douglas K. M., & Klein, O. (2021). A power-challenging theory of society, or a conservative mindset? Upward and downward conspiracy theories as ideologically distinct beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 51(4-5), 740-757. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2769
Neubert, C., Stiller, A., Bartsch, T., Dreißigacker, A., Isenhardt, A., Krieg, Y., Müller, P., & Zietlow, B. (2020). Kriminalität in der Corona-Krise: Haben die aktuellen Maßnahmen zur Eindämmung des Coronavirus möglicherweise einen Einfluss auf die Kriminalitätsentwicklung in Deutschland? Kriminologie – Das Online Journal, 2(2), 338-371. https://doi.org/10.18716/ojs/krimoj/2020.2.13
Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32, 303-330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2
OECD (2021). 21st-century readers: Developing literacy skills in a digital world. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a83d84cb-en
Ofcom (2018). News consumption in the UK: 2018. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0024/116529/news-consumption-2018.pdf.
Pauwels, L. J., & Svensson, R. (2017). How robust is the moderating effect of extremist beliefs on the relationship between self-control and violent extremism? Crime & Delinquency, 63(8), 1000-1016. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128716687757.
Pauwels, L. J. R., Hardyns, W., & Klima, N. (2021). Die Person-Umwelt Hypothese der Situational Action Theory und gewalttätiger Extremismus. Ein Teilprüfungsversuch. Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform 104(2), 124-138. https://doi.org/10.1515/mks-2021-0114
Pennycook, G., McPhetres, J., Zhang, Y., Lu, J. G., & Rand, D. G. (2020). Fighting COVID-19 misinformation on social media: Experimental evidence for a scalable accuracy nudge intervention. Psychological Science, 31(7), 770-780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620939054
Perry, G. Wikström, P.-O., & Roman, G. D. (2018). Differentiating right-wing extremism from potential for violent extremism: The role of criminogenic exposure. International Journal of Developmental Science, 12(1-2), 103-113. https://doi.org/10.3233/DEV-170240
Raabe, T., & Beelmann, A. (2009). Entwicklungspsychologische Grundlagen. In A. Beelmann, & K. J. Jonas (Eds.), Diskriminierung und Toleranz: Psychologische Grundlagen und Anwendungsperspektiven (pp. 113-135). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Rees, J. H., & Lamberty, P. K. (2019). Mitreißende Wahrheiten: Verschwörungsmythen als Gefahr für den gesellschaftlichen Zusammenhalt. In A. Zick, B. Küpper & Wilhelm Berghan (Eds.), Verlorene Mitte. Feindselige Zustände. Rechtsextreme Einstellungen in Deutschland 2018/19 (pp. 203-222). Bonn: Dietz.
Rizeq, J. (2019). An examination of the structure and common correlates of three domains of contaminated mindware in adolescence and young adulthood. Ph.D. thesis, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Rudman, L. A., & Saud, L. H. (2020). Justifying social inequalities: The role of social darwinism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(7), 1139–1155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219896924
Saleh, N. F., Roozenbeek, J. O. N., Makki, F. A., McClanahan, W. P., & Van Der Linden, S. (2021). Active inoculation boosts attitudinal resistance against extremist persuasion techniques: a novel approach towards the prevention of violent extremism. Behavioral Public Policy, 1-24. https://doi.org10.1017/bpp.2020.60
Schils, N., & Pauwels, L. J. (2016). Political violence and the mediating role of violent extremist propensities. Journal of Strategic Security, 9(2), 70-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.9.2.1491.
Schütz, H., & Six, B. (1996). How strong is the relationship between prejudice and discrimination? A meta-analytice answer. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20(3-4), 441-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(96)00028-4
Sears, D. O. (1983). The persistence of early political predispositions: The roles of attitude object and life stage. In L. Wheeler & P. Shaver (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology: Vol. 4 (pp. 79-116). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Sears, D. O. (1990). Whither political socialization research? The question of persistence. In O. Ichilov (Ed.), Political socialization, citizenship education, and democracy (pp. 69-79). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
Talaska, C. A., Fiske, S. T., & Chaiken, S. (2008). Legitimating racial discrimination: Emotions, not beliefs, best predict discrimination in a meta-analysis. Social Justice Research, 21, 263-396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-008-0071-2
Thórisdóttir H., & Jost, J. T. (2011). Motivated closed-mindedness mediates the effect of threat on political conservatism. Political Psychology, 32(5), 785-811. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00840.x
Van Hiel, A., Onraet, E., Bostyn, D. H., Stadeus, J., Haesevoets, T., Van Assche, J., & Roets, A. (2020). A meta-analytic integration of research on the relationship between right-wing ideological attitudes and aggressive tendencies. European Review of Social Psychology, 31(1), 183-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2020.1778324
Van Prooijen, J.-W., & Douglas, K. M. (2017). Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situation. Memory Studies, 10(3), 323-333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698017701615
Van Prooijen, J.-W., Krouwel, A. P. M., & Pollet, T. V. (2015). Political extremism predicts belief in conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(5), 570-578. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614567356
Vegetti, F., & Littvay, L. (2021). Belief in conspiracy theories and attitudes toward political violence. Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana Di Scienza Politica, 52(1), 18-32. https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2021.17
Wood, M. J., Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2012). Dead and alive. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(6), 767-773. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611434786
Wikström, P. O. H., & Bouhana, N. (2016). Analyzing radicalization and terrorism: A situational action theory. In G. LaFree & J. D. Freilich (Eds.), The handbook of the criminology of terrorism (pp. 175-186) Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
Zeit (2020) Rassismus, Verschwörungen und Paranoia.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Yvonne Krieg
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The JD Journal for Deradicalization uses a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND) Licence. You are free to share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under the following conditions:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, andindicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
