One Size Does Not Fit All: Exploring the Characteristics of Exit Programmes in Europe

Authors

  • Vítor Costa University of Beira Interior
  • Pedro Liberado University of Granada
  • Graça Esgalhado University of Beira Interior
  • Ana Isabel Cunha University of Beira Interior
  • Pedro das Neves Innovative Prison Systems

Keywords:

Exit Programs, Disengagement, Deradicalization, Interventions, Evaluations

Abstract

This paper presents findings from semi-structured interviews with 17 practitioners representing 14 exit interventions in 7 European countries. Drawing from the literature, the study identified analytical dimensions that provided the semi-structured interview script’s analytical framework (e.g., programme characteristics, implementation team, type of intervention, contact approach, programmes’ duration, the use of risk and needs assessment tools, follow-up/monitoring strategies/aftercare procedures). Results suggest that the goals, role of ideology and contact approach differ considerably across exit programmes. The use of risk and needs assessment tools is inconsistent across the programmes. The programmes’ evaluation was unstructured and primarily qualitative. The study has practical implications, namely the significant effort required to train exit practitioners in risk and needs assessment tools. A multi-agency approach will help improve the follow-up and aftercare practices.

Acknowledgment

This research was partially funded by the European Union Internal Security Fund (ISF) – Police, Grant Agreement: 823690 — Integrated Exit Programme for Prison and Probation (WayOut)

References

Altier, M. B., Boyle, E. L., Shortland, N. D., & Horgan, J. G. (2017). Why they leave: An analysis of terrorist disengagement events from eighty-seven autobiographical accounts. Security Studies, 26(2), 305–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2017.1280307

Altier, M. B., Thoroughgood, C. N., & Horgan, J. G. (2014). Turning away from terrorism: Lessons from psychology, sociology, and criminology . Journal of Peace Research , 51(5), 647–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343314535946

Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, S. J. (2004). The Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (LS/CMI). Multi-Health Systems.

Baaken, T., Korn, J., & Walkenhorst, D. (2018). EX POST PAPER The challenge of resocialisation : Dealing with radicalised individuals during and after imprisonment. https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/default/files/what-we-do/networks/radicalisation_awareness_network/about-ran/ran-p-and-p/docs/ran_pp_dealing_with_radicalised_individuals_06_112018_en.pdf (Accessed 22 February 2021).

Barrelle, K. (2015). Best student paper society for terrorism research annual conference 2014: Pro-integration: disengagement from and life after extremism. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 7(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2014.988165

Baruch, B., Ling, T., Warnes, R., & Hofman, J. (2018). Evaluation in an emerging field: Developing a measurement framework for the field of counter-violent-extremism. Evaluation, 24(4), 475–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389018803218

Belfrage, H., Strand, S., Ekman, L., & Hasselborg, A.-K. (2012). Assessing Risk of Patriarchal Violence with Honour as a Motive: Six Years Experience Using the PATRIARCH Checklist. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 14(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1350/ijps.2012.14.1.250

Bouzar, D., & Bénézech, M. (2019). Practical Guide of Assessment of Disengagement from Jihadist Violent Extremism: Indicators of deradicalization. Journal of Current Medical Research and Opinion, 02(10), 256–284. https://doi.org/10.15520/jcmro.v2i10.211

Bovenkerk, F. (2011). On leaving criminal organizations. Crime, Law and Social Change, 55(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-011-9281-x

Brown, K. (2019). Gender Mainstreaming Principles, Dimensions and Priorities for PVE. In UN Women. https://www.unwomen.org/-/media/headquarters/attachments/sections/library/publications/2019/gender-mainstreaming-principles-dimensions-and-priorities-for-pve-en.pdf?la=en&vs=1240 (Accessed 22 February 2021).

Campelo, N., Oppetit, A., Neau, F., Cohen, D., & Bronsard, G. (2018). Who are the European youths willing to engage in radicalisation? A multidisciplinary review of their psychological and social profiles. European Psychiatry, 52, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.03.001

Cherney, A. (2020). Evaluating interventions to disengage extremist offenders: a study of the proactive integrated support model (PRISM). Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 12(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2018.1495661

Cherney, A., De Rooy, K., & Eggins, E. (2021). Mandatory participation in programs to counter violent extremism: A review of evidence for and against. Journal for Deradicalization, 27 (Summer), 1–33.

Council of Europe. (2019). Guidelines Regarding Recruitment, Selection, Education, Training and Professional Development of Prison and Probation Staff. https://rm.coe.int/guidelines-training-staff/1680943aad (Accessed 13 February 2020).

Daugherty, C. E. (2019). Deradicalization and disengagement: Exit programs in Norway and Sweden and addressing Neo-Nazi extremism. Journal for Deradicalization, 21 (Winter), 219–260.

Demant, F., Slootman, M., Buijs, F., & Tillie, J. (2008). Decline and Disengagement: An Analysis of Processes of Deradicalisation. Institute for Migration and Ethnic Studies.

Directive (EU) 2016/680. (2016). Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free . http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2016/680/oj (Accessed 1 March 2021).

Edwards, W., & Newman, J. R. (1982). Multiattribute evaluation. SAGE.

European Commission. (2015). The European Agenda on Security COM(2015) 185 final.

European Commission. (2020a). The EU Security Union Strategy COM(2020) 605 final.

European Commission. (2020b). A Counter-Terrorism Agenda for the EU: Anticipate, Prevent, Protect, Respond COM(2020) 795 final.

Feddes, A. R., & Gallucci, M. (2015). A Literature Review on Methodology used in Evaluating Effects of Preventive and De-radicalisation Interventions. Journal for Deradicalization, 5 (Winter), 1–27.

Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International journal of qualitative methods, 5(1), 80-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107

Gielen, A. (2017). Countering Violent Extremism: A Realist Review for Assessing What Works, for Whom, in What Circumstances, and How? Terrorism and Political Violence, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2017.1313736

Gielen, A. (2018). Exit programmes for female jihadists: A proposal for conducting realistic evaluation of the Dutch approach. International Sociology, 33(4), 454–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580918775586

Harris-Hogan, S., Barrelle, K., & Zammit, A. (2016). What is countering violent extremism? Exploring CVE policy and practice in Australia. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 8(1), 6–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2015.1104710

Hedayah, & International Centre for Counter-Terrorism. (2013). Additional Guidance on the Role of Psychologists/Psychology in Rehabilitation and Reintegration Programs. http://www.icct.nl/app/uploads/download/file/Hedayah-ICCT Psychology Good Practices.pdf (Accessed 22 February 2021).

Helmus, T. T., Matthews, M., Ramchand, R., Beaghley, S., Stebbins, D., Kadlec, A., Brown, M. A., Kofner, A., & Acosta, J. D. (2017). RAND Program Evaluation Toolkit for Countering Violent Extremism. In RAND Program Evaluation Toolkit for Countering Violent Extremism. RAND Corporation. https://doi.org/10.7249/tl243

Horgan, J., & Braddock, K. (2010). Rehabilitating the terrorists?: Challenges in assessing the effectiveness of de-radicalization programs. Terrorism and Political Violence, 22(2), 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546551003594748

Koehler, D. (2017a). Structural Quality Standards for work to intervene with and counter violent extremism. http://girds.org/file_download/23/final-handbook-quality-standards.pdf (Accessed 12 August 2019).

Koehler, D. (2017b). A typology of “de-radicalisation” programmes. In Lore Colaert (Ed.), ‘De-radicalisation’ Scientific insights for policy (pp. 63–82). Flemish Peace Institute. https://www.flemishpeaceinstitute.eu/sites/vlaamsvredesinstituut.eu/files/files/reports/deradicalisering_eng_lowres.pdf (Accessed 7 March 2019).

Koehler, D., & Fiebig, V. (2019). Knowing What to Do: Academic and Practitioner Understanding of How to Counter Violent Radicalization. Perspectives on Terrorism, 13(3), 44–62. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26681908 (Accessed 19 July 2021).

Kropp, P. R., & Hart, S. D. (2000). The spousal assault risk assessment (SARA) guide: Reliability and validity in adult male offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 24(1), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005430904495

Levy, I. (2018). Deradicalization Programs in Australia and the Foreign Fighter Phenomenon. https://www.ict.org.il/images/Australia foreign fighters.pdf (Accessed 22 February 2021).

Lewis, J., Marsden, S., & Copeland, S. (2020). Evaluating programmes to prevent and counter extremism. https://crestresearch.ac.uk/download/11267/ (Accessed 22 February 2021).

Lipsey, M., Petrie, C., Weisburd, D., & Gottfredson, D. (2006). Improving evaluation of anti-crime programs: Summary of a National Research Council report. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2(3), 271–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-006-9009-6

Lodenius, A.-L. (2010). To leave a destructive life full of hate: The Story of Exit in Sweden.

Manzano, A. (2016). The craft of interviewing in realist evaluation. Evaluation, 22(3), 342–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389016638615

Marsden, S. V. (2015). Conceptualising ‘success’ with those convicted of terrorism offences: Aims, methods, and barriers to reintegration. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 7(2), 143–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2014.1001421

Mathison, S. (1988). Why Triangulate? Educational Researcher, 17(2), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X017002013

Mayne, J. (2008). Contribution analysis: An approach to exploring cause and effect. ILAC Brief 16, 1–4.

Meloy, J. R. (2018). The Operational Development and Empirical Testing of the Terrorist Radicalization Assessment Protocol (TRAP–18). Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(5), 483–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1481077

Metz, A., & Louison, L. (2019). The Hexagon: An Exploration Tool. NIRN - University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Milla, M. N., Hudiyana, J., & Arifin, H. H. (2020). Attitude toward rehabilitation as a key predictor for adopting alternative identities in deradicalization programs: An investigation of terrorist detainees’ profiles. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 23(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12380

Monahan, J., & Skeem, J. L. (2016). Risk Assessment in Criminal Sentencing. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 12(1), 489–513. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-092945

Nolde, K., Feder, J., Möller, K., Dietrich, K., & Liedtke, S. (2020). Erfahrungsräume öffnen – Demokratie gestalten Die KISSeS-Strategie in der Praxis.

Orban, F. (2019). Mentorordningen i kriminalomsorgen: en prosessevaluering. https://krus.brage.unit.no/krus-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2584996/Mentorordningen i kriminalomsorgen.pdf (Accessed 1 March 2021)

Organisasjonen Voksne for Barn. (2000). PROSJEKT EXIT – SLUTTRAPPORT. https://docplayer.me/1333874-Prosjekt-exit-sluttrapport.html#show_full_text (Accessed 22 February 2021).

Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. (2019). Understanding the role of gender in preventing and countering violent extremism and radicalization that lead to terrorism good practices for law enforcement. Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/0/b/420563_1.pdf (Accessed 22 February 2021).

Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic Evaluation. Sage.

Pistone, I., Eriksson, E., Beckman, U., Mattson, C., & Sager, M. (2019). A scoping review of interventions for preventing and countering violent extremism: Current status and implications for future research. Journal for Deradicalization, 19 (Summer), 1–84. https://journals.sfu.ca/jd/index.php/jd/article/view/213 (Accessed 19 July 2021).

Pressman, D., Rinne, T., Duits, N., & Flockton, J. (2016). VERA-2R: Violent Extremism Risk Assessment-Version 2 Revised. Netherlands Ministry of Security and Justice, Netherlands Institute for Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology.

Radicalisation Awareness Network. (2017). EX POST PAPER Setting up an exit intervention. https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/networks/radicalisation_awareness_network/about-ran/ran-exit/docs/ran_exit_setting_up_exit_intervention_berlin_13-14_022017_en.pdf (Accessed 22 October 2019).

Radicalisation Awareness Network. (2018). Preventing Radicalisation to Terrorism and Violent Extremism: approaches and practices.

Rampin, R., Rampin, V., & DeMott, S. (2021). Taguette (0.11). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5075766

Regulation (EU) 2016/679. (2016). General Data Protection Regulation. European Parliament, Council of the European Union. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj (Accessed 10 December 2020).

Scarcella, A., Page, R., & Furtado, V. (2016). Terrorism, radicalisation, extremism, authoritarianism and fundamentalism: A systematic review of the quality and psychometric properties of assessments. PLoS ONE, 11(12), 0–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166947

Schuurman, B., & Bakker, E. (2016). Reintegrating jihadist extremists: evaluating a Dutch initiative, 2013–2014. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 8(1), 66–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2015.1100648

Spalek, B., & Davies, L. (2012). Mentoring in relation to violent extremism: A study of role, purpose, and outcomes. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 35(5), 354–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2012.666820

Speckhard, A. (2011). Prison and community-based disengagement and de-radicalization programs for extremist involved in militant jihadi terrorism ideologies and activities. In A. Speckhard (Ed.), Psychosocial, organizational and cultural aspects of terrorism (pp. 11-1-11–14). NATO-Research and Technology Organisation. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.222.2350&rep=rep1&type=pdf (Accessed 22 February 2021).

The Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention. (2001). Exit: A follow-up and evaluation of the organisation for people wishing to leave racist and nazi groups. https://bra.se/download/18.cba82f7130f475a2f1800028108/1371914734840/2001_exit_a_follow-up_and_evaluation.pdf (Accessed 22 February 2021).

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2016). Management of Violent Extremist Prisoners and the Prevention of Radicalization to Violence in Prisons. http://www.unodc.org/pdf/criminal_justice/Handbook_on_VEPs.pdf (Accessed 19 November 2019).

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2020). UNODC Strategy 2021–2025.

van de Donk, M., Uhlmann, M., & Keijze, F. (2020). Peer and Self Review Manual for Exit Work. https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/default/files/what-we-do/networks/radicalisation_awareness_network/about-ran/ran-exit/docs/ran_exit_peer_self_review_manual_for_exit_work_en.pdf (Accessed 29 March 2021).

van den Berg, H., A. van Hemert, D., & J. van Vliet, A. (2018). Creating a Knowledge Base for Interventions Countering (Violent) Extremism: Intervention Goals and Mechanisms for Different Ideologies. Journal for Deradicalization, 15 (Summer), 43–75. https://journals.sfu.ca/jd/index.php/jd/article/view/149 (Accessed 19 July 2021).

van der Heide, L., & Schuurman, B. (2018). Reintegrating Terrorists in the Netherlands: Evaluating the Dutch approach. Journal for Deradicalization, 17 (Winter), 196–239.

Veldhuis, T. M. (2015). Reintegrating Violent Extremist Offenders: Policy Questions and Lessons Learned. October. https://cchs.gwu.edu/sites/cchs.gwu.edu/files/downloads/VeldhuisPaper-Final%0A(2).pdf (Accessed 22 February 2021).

Violence Prevention Network. (2019). Deradicalisation in Prison. https://violence-prevention-network.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Violence-Prevention-Network-Deradicalisation-in-prison-1.pdf (Accessed 18 December 2019).

Walkenhorst, D., Baaken, T., Ruf, M., Leaman, M., Handle, J., & Korn, J. (2020). Rehabilitation Manual. https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/networks/radicalisation_awareness_network/ran-papers/docs/ran_rehab_manual_en.pdf (Accessed 21 February 2021).

Webster, C. D., Douglas, K. S., Eaves, S. D., & Hart, S. D. (1997). Assessing risk of violence to others. In C. D. Webster & M. A. Jackson (Eds.), Impulsivity: Theory, assessment, and treatment (pp. 251–277). Guilford.

Williams, M. J., & Kleinman, S. M. (2014). A utilization-focused guide for conducting terrorism risk reduction program evaluations. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 6(2), 102–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2013.860183

Williams, R. J. (2016). Approaches to violent extremist offenders and countering radicalisation in prisons and probation. https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/networks/radicalisation_awareness_network/about-ran/ran-p-and-p/docs/ran_pp_approaches_to_violent_extremist_en.pdf (Accessed 8 March 2019).

Downloads

Published

2021-09-24

Issue

No. 28 (2021): Fall

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Vítor Costa, Pedro Liberado, Graça Esgalhado, Ana Isabel Cunha, Pedro das Neves

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The JD Journal for Deradicalization uses a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND) Licence. You are free to share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under the following conditions: