De-radicalisation Through the Performative Arts

Simon Terhaag

Abstract


The Arab-Israeli conflict plays out on a variety of arenas. With regards to international involvement and support, the discursive aspect of the conflict is particularly important; how each side represents itself and the other. In this paper, the discursive means by which contemporary theatre dealing on the Arab-Israeli conflict are examined, with specific regard to changing these frames in a way that can allow for more dialogue and the deconstruction of demonising tropes that continue to frame the conflict today. In the works of Naomi Wallace’s Vision One: a State of Innocence, a powerful message to this end is delivered, creating an uneasy link between a Palestinian lady and the Israeli soldier who shot her daughter, but died in her arms. Rife with accusations, the play yet manages to bind the two characters together through a trauma that each has lived, a continues suffering of the radical elements in their societies. This connection draws a sobering, yet hopeful conjecture about the ongoing nature of the conflict; the more each side has radicalised itself and inflicted harm on the other, the more the self has suffered, too. The resulting trauma experienced is common ground on which the two sides can understand each other. As a performed experience, the stage is shown to be a safe space on which to express this possibility of approaching the other, of taking down walls both sides have built up for over half a century, and allow for the possibility of recognising each others’ humanity.


Keywords


Self-victimisation; Trauma; Theatre; Israel; Palestine

Full Text:

PDF

References


Åkerström, M. & al., e., 2011. Balancing Contradictory Identities - Performing Masculinity

in Victim Narratives. Sociological Perspectives, pp. 103-124.

Aston, E., 2003. An Introduction to Feminism and Theatre. s.l.:Routledge.

Austin, J. L., 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University

Press.

Bar-Siman-Tov, Y., 1994. The Arab-Israeli Conflict: Learning Conflict Resolution. Journal

of Peace Research, pp. 75-92.

Bottoms, S., 2006. Putting the Document in Documentary: An Unwelcome Corrective?.

TDR, pp. 56-68.

Butler, J., 1990. Gender Trouble. New York: Routledge.

Caruth, C., 1996. Unclaimed Experience: Trauma, Narrative, and History. Baltimore: Johns

Hopkins University Press.

Diamond, E., 1996. Performance and Cultural Politics. New York and London: Routledge.

Duggan, P., 2012. Trauma-Tragedy: Symptoms of Contemporary Performance. Manchester:

Manchester University Press.

Entman, R. M., 1993. Framing: Towards Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of

Communications, pp. 51-58.

Haron, M. J., 1981. The British Decision to Give the Palestine Question to the United

Nations. Middle Eastern Studies, pp. 241-248.

Herman, J. L., 2001. Trauma and Recovery: From Domestic Abuse to Political Terror.

London: Rivers Oram Press.

Holstein, J. A. & Miller, G., 1990. Rethinking Victimization: An Interactional Approach to

Victimology. Symbolic Interaction, pp. 103-122.

Hunter, R. E., 2010. The Arab-Israeli Conflict. In: Building Security in the Persian Gulf.

s.l.:RAND Corporation, pp. 67-77.

Kemp, A., 1998. From Politics of Location to Politics of Signification: The Construction of

Political Territory in Israel's First Years. Journal of Area Studies, pp. 74-101.

Khalidi, R. I., 2014. From the Editor: Israel: A Carceral State.. Journal of Palestine Studies ,

pp. 5-10.

McGreal, C., 2020. The Guardian: All that’s missing from Trump’s ‘overly good’ Middle

East plan is Palestinians. [Online] Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jan/28/israel-palestinian-peace-plan-trump-reaction [Accessed 28 01 2020].

Noor, M. & Halabi, S., 2018. Can we forgive a militant outgroup member? The role of

perspective-taking. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 21(4), pp. 246-255.

Prier, J., 2017. Commanding the Trend: Social Media as Information Warfare. Strategic

Studies Quarterly, 11(4), pp. 50-85.

Reinelt, J., 2002. The Politics of Discourse: Performativity Meets Theatricality. SubStance,

(2-3), p. 201–215.

Riessman, K. C., 2002. Analysis of Personal Narratives. In: J. G. a. J. Holstein, ed. Handbook

of Interview Research. London: Sage, pp. 695-710.

Rogan, E., 2010. The Arabs: a History. London: Penguin Books.

Rotbard, S., 2003. Wall and Tower (Homa Umigdal): The Mold of Israeli Architecture. In: R.

S. a. E. Weizman, ed. A Civilian Occupation: The Politics of Israeli Architecture. Tel Aviv: Babel and Verso, pp. 39-56.

Savir, U., 2017. Al-Monitor: Palestinians reject US mediation. [Online] Available at:

https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2017/12/israel-palestine-jerusalem-capital-trump-abbas-us-mediation.html [Accessed 06 12 2019].

Scham, P., 2008. Israel: Growing Pains at 60, Washington DC: The Middle East Institute.

Schechner, R., 2005. Performance Theory. London: Taylor and Francis.

Schechner, R., 2013. Performance Studies: An Introduction. New York: Routledge.

Schroeder, R., 2018. Digital Media and the Rise of Right Wing Populism. In: Social Theory

after the Internet: Media, Technology, and Globalization. s.l.:UCL Press, pp. 60-81.

Shafir, G., 1989. Land, Labor, and the Origins of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, 1882-1914.

Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

Shamieh, B., 2008. The Brooklyn Rail: The Art of Countering Despair: Naomi Wallace.

[Online] Available at: https://brooklynrail.org/2008/05/theater/the-art-of-countering-despair-naomi-wallace [Accessed 18 03 2020].

Solga, K., 2006. Rape's Metatheatrical Retun: Rehearsing Sexual Violence among the Early

Moderns. Theatre Journal , pp. 53-72.

Veracini, L., 2006. Israel and Settler Society. London: Pluto Press.

Wallace 2009, N., 2009. Vision One: a State of Innocence. In: The Fever Chart. New York:

Theatre Communications Group, pp. 5-24.

Weizman, C., 1983. The Letters and Papers of Chaim Weizman. New York and Jerusalem:

Transaction Books.

Wilkenfeld, J., Lussier, V. L. & Tahtinen, D., 1972. Conflict Interactions in the Middle East, 1949-1967. n.d.. Journal of Conflict Resolution, Volume 16, pp. 135-154.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Simon Terhaag

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

ISSN: 2363-9849 

Proud Member of the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)