Realising Violent Extremist Risk Assessments in Indonesia: Simplify and Collaborate

Cameron Sumpter

Abstract


Evaluations aiming to assess the risk posed by individuals suspected or convicted of violent extremist activity have developed rapidly since the late 2000s. Largely based on a process known as structured professional judgement, terrorist risk assessments have drawn upon decades of research on those used for non-ideological violent criminals, and inserted contemporary understandings of what may drive extremist violence. While uncertainty over precise risk factors presents ongoing challenges, the primary problem is that risk assessment instruments tend to be time consuming and complex, thus requiring a level of practitioner expertise not always readily available. Over the past several years, Indonesia has been experimenting with strategies to evaluate risk among individual extremist prisoners, but disagreements over suitability and human resource constraints have hindered progress. One way forward could be the establishment of a more simplified assessment system shared by relevant government stakeholders, from law enforcement to prison authorities to social service providers. While an abridged judgement process would hold limited capacity for prediction, a collaborative approach would add clarity and much needed inter-agency coordination to the management of convicted extremists in Indonesia.


Keywords


Risk Assessments; Violent Extremism; Indonesia; Prisons; Rehabilitation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abbiati, M., Palix, J., Gasser, J., & Moulin, V. (2017). Predicting physically violent misconduct in prison: A comparison of four risk assessment instruments. Behav Sci Law. 37, 61-77.

Anindya, C.R., (2019) The Deradicalisation Programme for Indonesian Deportees: A Vacuum in Coordination. Journal for Deradicalization. 18, 217-243.

Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Terorisme (2013). Blueprint Deradikalisasi. Deputi Bidan Pencegahan, Perlindungan dan Deradikalisasi, Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Terorisme. 1-122.

Barabas, C., Dinakar, K. & Doyle, C. (2019, July 17). The Problems with Risk Assessment Tools. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/17/opinion/pretrial-ai.html (accessed 17/7/19).

Barabas, C., Dinakar, K., Ito, J., Virza, M. & Zittrain, J. (2018). Interventions over Predictions: Reframing the Ethical Debate for Actuarial Risk Assessment. FAT. 1-9.

Bonnett, P. (2011). Indonesian Deployment of Corrective Services NSW Officers. Australasian Journal of Correctional Staff Development. 1-6.

Borum, R. (2015). Assessing Risk for Terrorism Involvement. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management. 2(2), 63-87.

Clemmow, C., Schumann, S., Salman, N.L. & Gill, P. (2020). The Base Rate Study: Developing Base Rates for Risk Factors and Indicators for Engagement in Violent Extremism. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 1-17.

Cornwall, S. & Molenkamp, M. (2018). Developing, implementing and using risk assessment for violent extremist and terrorist offenders. RAN Ex Post Paper. 1-12.

Dean, G. & Pettet, G. (2017). The 3 R’s of risk assessment for violent extremism. Journal of Forensic Practice. 19(2), 91-101.

Desmarais, S.L., Simons-Rudolph, J., Brugh, C.S., Schilling, E. & Hoggan, C. (2017) The State of Scientific Knowledge Regarding Factors Associated with Terrorism. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management. 4(4), 180-209.

Direktorat Jenderal Pemasyarakatan, Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia & The United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute (2017). Grand Design and Road Map: Penanganan Warga Binaan Pemasyarakatan Risiko Tinggi (Draft Executive Summary), 1-57.

Flockton, J. (2011). International Developments in Extremist Violent Risk Assessment and Management: Professional Development study trip to Canada 13-27 June 2010. Australasian Journal of Correctional Staff Development. 1-6.

Flores, A.W., Lowenkamp, C.T., Holsinger, A.M. & Latessa, E.J. (2006). Predicting outcome with the level of Service Inventory-Revised: The importance of implementation integrity. Journal of Criminal Justice. 34, 523-529.

Glendinning, L. & Weaver, M. (2009, July 17). Eight dead as bombers target western-owned Jakarta hotels. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/jul/17/bombs-explode-hotels-indonesia (accessed 21/10/19)

Guy, L.S., Packer, I.K. & Warnken, W. (2012). Assessing Risk of Violence Using Structured Professional Judgment Guidelines. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice. 12(3), 270-283.

Institute for Policy Analysis of Conflict (2014, June 30). Countering Violent Extremism in Indonesia: Need for a Rethink. IPAC Report No.11. 1-22.

Institute for Policy Analysis of Conflict (2013, September 2). Prison Problems: Planned and Unplanned Releases of Convicted Extremists in Indonesia. IPAC Report No.2. 1-26.

Institute for Policy Analysis of Conflict (2018, August 10). Recent and Planned Releases of Indonesian Extremists: An Update. IPAC Report No.49. 1-20.

Institute for Policy Analysis of Conflict (2015, January 19). Support for “Islamic State” in Indonesian Prisons. IPAC Report No. 15. 1-27.

Institute for Policy Analysis of Conflict (2016, December 14). Update on Indonesian Pro-ISIS Prisoners and Deradicalisation Efforts. IPAC Report No.34. 1-15.

Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia. (2019) Keputusan Direktur Jenderal Pemasyarakatan Pas-251 .PK.01.02.02 Instrumen Penilaian Kebutuhan Pembinaan Narapidana Risiko Teroris.

Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia. (2013) Peraturan Menteri Nomor 12 Tahun 2013 tentang Assessment Risiko dan Assessment Kebutuhan Bagi Narapidana dan Klien Pemasyarakatan. 1-9.

Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia. (2018) Peraturan Menteri Nomor 03 Tahun 2018 tentang Syarat dan Tata Cara Pemerian Remisi, Asimilasi, Cuti, Mengunjungi Keluarga, Pembebasan Bersyarat, Cuti Menjelang, Bebas, dan Cuti Bersyarat. 1-86.

Lloyd, M. (2019). Extremism Risk Assessment: A Directory. Full Report, Centre for Research and Evidence on Security Threats. 1-46.

Logan, C. & Lloyd, M. (2018). Violent Extremism: A comparison of approaches to assessing and managing risk. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 24, 141-161.

Makarios, M. & Latessa, E.J. (2013). Developing a Risk and Needs Assessment Instrument for Prison Inmates: The Issue of Outcome. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 40(12), 1449-1471.

Monahan, J. (2011). The Individual Risk Assessment of Terrorism. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 18(2), 167-205.

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (99/2012). Perubahan Kedua Atas Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 32 Tahun 1999 Tentang Syarat Dan Tata Cara Pelaksanaan Hak Warga Binaan Pemasyarakatan

Pressman, D.E. & Flockton, J. (2012). Calibrating risk for violent political extremists and terrorists; the VERA 2 structured assessment. The British Journal of Forensic Practice. 14(4), 237-251.

Richards, J. (2018). High Risk or Low Risk: Screening for Violent Extremists in DDR Programmes. International Peacekeeping. 25:3, 373-393.

RTI International. (2018). Countering Violent Extremism: The Application of Risk Assessment Tools in the Criminal Justice and Rehabilitation Process. RTI Project Number 0214428.004.

Sageman, M. (2017). Misunderstanding Terrorism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press

Santos, A.P. (2019, December 27). Who were the Indonesian husband and wife behind Jolo bombing? Rappler. https://www.rappler.com/world/regions/asia-pacific/247991-indonesian-husband-wife-behind-jolo-bombing (accessed 21/1/20).

Sarma, K.M. (2017). Risk Assessment and the Prevention of Radicalization from Nonviolence into Terrorism. American Psychologist. 72(3), 278-288.

Scarcella, A., Page, R., & Furtado, V. (2016). Terrorism, Radicalisation, Extremism, Authoritarianism and Fundamentalism: A Systematic Review of the Quality and Psychometric Properties of Assessments. PLoS One. 11(12), 1-19.

Search for Common Ground. (2011). Reducing Recidivism: A Process for Effective Disengagement of High-Risk Prisoners in Indonesia (Mid-Term Evaluation). https://www.sfcg.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/INA_EV_Feb11_Countering-and-Preventing-Radicalization-in-Indonesian-Prisons.pdf (accessed 17/12/19).

Silke, A. (2014). Risk Assessment of Terrorist and Extremist Prisoners. In A. Silke (Ed.), Prisons, Terrorism and Extremism (pp. 108-121). New York: Routledge.

Skeem, J.L. & Monahan, J. (2011). Current Directions in Violence Risk Assessment. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 20(1), 38-42.

Sumpter, C. (2018) Returning Indonesian Extremists: Unclear Intentions and Unprepared Responses. ICCT Policy Brief, 1-14.

United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research institute. (2018). Strengthening Efforts to Prevent and Counter Violent Extremism: Good Practices and Lessons Learned for a Comprehensive Approach to Rehabilitation and Reintegration of VEOs. 1-74.

Yukhnenko, D., Sridhar, S. & Fazel, S. (2019). A systematic review of criminal recidivism rates worldwide: 3-year update. Wellcome Open Res 4(28).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Cameron Sumpter

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

ISSN: 2363-9849 

Proud Member of the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)