Evidence-based informed policy design for support groups for families of foreign fighters: Ex ante application of realistic evaluation and review

Authors

  • Amy-Jane Gielen University of Amsterdam
  • Annebregt Dijkman Sherazade Advies

Keywords:

Foreign Fighters, Family Support Groups, CVE, Realistic Evaluation, Realist Review and Deradicalization

Abstract

Most programs to prevent and counter violent extremism (CVE) now include support programs for families of violent extremists. However, like many other CVE interventions and programs, the evidence base is still very limited. This article presents a literature review and a multi-method data assessment (including interviews with parents and family members of jihadist foreign fighters, with experts, focus groups with families of foreign fighters and policy makers) regarding the evidence base for family support programs in the CVE field. This fits within a recent trend to develop and apply evaluation to the CVE field. This article differs from other CVE evaluation studies, because it applies realist review and realistic evaluation ex ante rather than ex post. This article demonstrates that such an ex ante approach can contribute to the legitimacy, feasibility and effectiveness of CVE policy and prepare the ground for more thorough evaluation research.

References

Amarasingam, A., & Dawson, L. L. (2018). “I left to be closer to Allah”. Learning about Foreign Fighters from Family and Friends. London: ISD. Accessed on September 18, 2019 via: https://www.isdglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Families_Report.pdf

Awan, Imran, & Guru, Surinder (2017). Parents of foreign “terrorist” fighters in Syria – will they report their young? Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol.40(1), pp. 24-42. doi:10.1080/01419870.2016.1206588

Baruch, B., Ling, T., Warnes, R., & Hofman, J. (2018). “Evaluation in an emerging field: Developing a measurement framework for the field of counter-violent-extremism,” Evaluation, Vol. 24 (4), 475-495. doi:10.1177/1356389018803218

Bellasio, Jacopo, Joanna Hofman, Antonia Ward, Fook Nederveen, Anna Knack, Arya Sofia Meranto and Stijn Hoorens (2018). Counterterrorism evaluation. Taking stock and looking ahead. Brussels: RAND Europe. Accessed on September 16, 2019 via: https://www.wodc.nl/binaries/2865_Volledige_Tekst_tcm28-354255.pdf

Cherney, Andrew (2018). “Evaluating interventions to disengage extremist offenders: a study of the proactive integrated support model (PRISM),” Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 1-20. doi:10.1080/19434472.2018.1495661

Cherney, Andrew & Belton, E. (2019). “Evaluating Case-Managed Approaches to Counter Radicalization and Violent Extremism: An Example of the Proactive Integrated Support Model (PRISM) Intervention.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, pp.1-21. doi:10.1080/1057610X.2019.1577016

Chien, Wai-Tong et al. (2004), “A random controlled trail of mutual support group for family caregivers of patients with schizophrenia,” International Journal of Nursing Studies, Vol. 41 (6), pp. 637-649.

Chien, Wai-Tong; Norman, Ian (2009), “The effectiveness and active ingredients of mutual support groups for family caregivers of people with psychotic disorders: A literature review,” International Journal of Nursing Studies, Vol. 46 (12), pp. 1604-1623.

Citron, Manulyn; Solomon, Phyllis; Draine, Jeffrey (1999), “Self-Help Groups for Families of Persons with Mental Illness: Perceived Benefits of Helpfulness,” Community Mental Health Journal, 1999, Vol. 35 (1), pp. 15-30.

Coulson, N. S.; Greenwood, N. (2012). “Families affected by childhood cancer: an analysis of the provision of social support within online support groups,” Child: Care, Health and Development, Vol.38 (6), pp. 870-877.

Distelbrink, Marjolijn, Marjan de Gruijter en Dick Oudenampsen (2008). Effecten van lotgenotencontact. Onderzoek bij de Vereniging Spierziekten Nederland. Utrecht: Verwey-Jonker Instituut.

European Eye on Radicalization (2018). An Interview with Dr. John Horgan – Terrorism, Psychology, and Major Issues in the Field, 20 November 2018. Accessed on January 6, 2019 via: https://eeradicalization.com/an-interview-with-dr-john-horgan-terrorism-psychology-and-major-issues-in-the-field/

Fischbacher-Smith, Denis (2016). “Framing the UK’s counter-terrorism policy within the context of a wicked problem,” Public Money & Management, Vol. 36 (6), pp. 399-408.

Gielen, Amy-Jane (2014). “Syrië-strijders: liever families ondersteunen dan paspoort afnemen. Antiradicalisering in België, Denemarken en Duitsland,” Tijdschrift voor Sociale Vraagstukken, nr. 1, pp. 20-23.

Gielen, Amy-Jane (2015a). “Supporting families of foreign fighters. A realistic approach for measuring the effectiveness.” Journal for Deradicalization, Vol. 2, pp. 21-48.

Gielen, Amy-Jane (2017a). “Countering Violent Extremism: A Realist Review for Assessing What Works, for Whom, in What Circumstances, and How?” Terrorism and Political Violence, pp. 1-19, DOI: 10.1080/09546553.2017.1313736

Gielen, Amy-Jane (2018a), “Exit Programmes for Female Jihadists: A Proposal for Conducting a Realistic Evaluation of the Dutch Approach,” International Sociology, pp. 454 – 472.

Gielen, Amy-Jane (2019: forthcoming). Cutting through Complexity. Evaluating Countering Violent Extremism. University of Amsterdam: PhD Manuscript.

Hayden, Nancy K. (2006). “The Complexity of Terrorism: Social and Behavioral Understanding Trends for the Future,” Information Age Warfare Quarterly, Vol. 1 (2).

Helmus, Todd C., Miriam Matthews, Rajeev Ramchand, Sina Beaghley, David Stebbins, Amanda Kadlec, Michael A. Brown, Aaron Kofner, and Joie D. Acosta (2017). RAND Program Evaluation Toolkit for Countering Violent Extremism. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Accessed on January 5, 2019 via: https://www.rand.org/pubs/tools/TL243.html.

Horgan, J., & Braddock, K. (2010). Rehabilitating the Terrorists? Challenges in Assessing the Effectiveness of De-radicalization Programs. Terrorism and Political Violence, 22(2), 267-291. doi:10.1080/09546551003594748

Ivey, Allen E. (1976). “Counseling Psychoeducator, The Psychoeducator Model and Future,” The counseling Psychologist, Vol. 6 (3), pp. 72-75.

Khalil, James and Martine Zeuthen (2016). Countering Violent Extremism and Risk Reduction: A Guide to Programme Design and Evaluation. London: RUSI. Accessed on January 5, 2019 via: https://rusi.org/publication/whitehall-reports/countering-violent-extremism-and-risk-reduction-guide-programme-design

Koehler, Daniel (2013). “Family counselling as prevention and intervention tool against ‘Foreign Fighters’. The German ‘Hayat’ Program.” JEX Journal EXIT-Deutschland. Zeitschrift für Deradikalisierung und demokratische Kultur, 3, p.182-204

Koehler, Daniel. (2017). How and why we should take deradicalization seriously. Nature Human Behaviour, Vol.1, 0095. doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0095

Koehler, Daniel & Ehrt, Tobuas (2018). “Parents’ Associations, Support Group Interventions and Countering Violent Extremism: An Important Step Forward in Combating Violent Radicalization.” International Annals of Criminology, Vol. 56 (1-2), pp. 178-197.

Kundnani, Arun (2009). Spooked! How not to prevent violent extremism. London: Institute of Race Relations.

Maher, Shiraz & Peter Neumann (2016). Pain, Confusion, Anger, and Shame: The Stories of Islamic State Families. London: ICSR. Accessed on August 4, 2016 via: http://icsr.info/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/ICSR-Report-Pain-Confusion-Anger-and-Shame-The-Stories-of-Islamic-State-Families1.pdf

Mastroe, C., & Szmania, S. (2016). Surveying CVE Metrics in Prevention, Disengagement and De-Radicalization Programs. Accessed on September 17, 2019 from College Par, MD: https://www.start.umd.edu/pubs/START_SurveyingCVEMetrics_March2016.pdf

Mattei, Christina & Sarah Zeiger (2018). Evaluate your CVE results. Project your impact. Arab Emirates: Hedaya. Accessed on December 10, 2018 via: http://www.hedayahcenter.org/Admin/Content/File-16720189339.pdf

Mertens, Donna M. (2015). “Mixed Methods and Wicked Problems,” Journal of Mixed Methods Research, Vol. 9 (1), pp. 3–6.

NCTV (2016a). Samenvatting ‘De jihad beëindigd? 24 teruggekeerde Syriëgangers in beeld’ Den Haag: NCTV. Accessed on 5 November, 2016 via: https://www.nctv.nl/binaries/samenvatting-jihad-beeindigd-def_tcm31-32539.pdf

Nelen, Hans; Frans Leeuw; Stefan Bogaerts (2010). Evaluatie van antiterrorismebeleid Nederland in vergelijkend perspectief: literatuurstudie. Den Haag: Boom Juridische Uitgevers in opdracht van het WODC. Accessed on January 5, 2010 via: https://www.wodc.nl/binaries/1892_Volledige_Tekst_tcm28-71143.pdf

Noordegraaf, Mirko; Scott Douglas, Aline Bos and Wouter Klem (2017). “How to evaluate the governance of transboundary problems? Assessing a national counterterrorism strategy,” Evaluation, Vol. 23 (4), pp. 389 – 406.

Pawson, Ray, Trisha Greenhalgh, Gill Harvey and Kieran Walshe (2005). “Realist review – a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions,” Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, Vol. 10 Suppl. 1, pp. 21–34.

Pawson, Ray (2006). Evidence-based Policy: A realist Perspective. London: SAGE.

Pawson, Ray and Nick Tilley (1997). Realistic Evaluation. London: SAGE.

Pawson, Ray, Trisha Greenhalgh, Gill Harvey and Kieran Walshe (2005). “Realist review – a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions,” Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, Vol. 10 Suppl. 1, pp. 21–34.

Radicalisation Awareness Network (2013). RAN Declaration of Good Practices for Engagement with Foreign Fighters for Prevention, Outreach, Rehabilitation and Reintegration. Brussels: RAN. Accessed on December 15, 2019 via: http://www.icct.nl/download/file/RAN-Declaration-Good-Practices-for-Engagement-with-Foreign-Fighters.pdf

RAN Centre of Excellence (2018). Ex Post Paper. Guideline Evaluation of PCVE Programmes and Interventions. Brussels: RAN Centrel of Excellence Accessed on September 2, 2018 via: https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/networks/radicalisation_awareness_network/ran-papers/docs/ms_workshops_guidelines_evaluation_of_pcve_programmes_and_interventions_july_2018_en.pdf

San, Marion van (2018). De onvoorspelbare terrorist. Het ‘magisch denken’ over preventie van radicalisering en de mogelijkheden tot deradicalisering. Brussel: Itinera Institute.

Sieckelinck, Stijn and Micha de Winter (eds.) (2015). Formers & families . Transitional journeys in and out of extremisms in the United Kingdom, Denmark and The Netherlands. The Hague, NCTV.

Weenink, Anton (2015). “Behavioral Problems and Disorders among Radicals in Police Files,” Pespectives on Terrorism, Vol. 9 (2).

Wei, Yingshun; Chu, Hsin; Chen, Chiunghua; Hsueh, Yujung; Chang, Yushiun; Chang, Lui; Chou, Kueiru (2012), “Support groups for caregivers of intellectually disabled family members: effects on physical–psychological health and social support,” Journal of Clinical Nursing, Vol. 21 (11/12), pp. 1666-1677.

Williams, Michael J., John G. Horgan and William P. Evans (2016b). Evaluation of a Multi-Faceted, U.S. Community-Based, Muslim-Led CVE Program. Washington: US Department of Justice, June 2016. Accessed on March 7, 2017 via: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/249936.pdf

Downloads

Published

2019-09-25

Issue

No. 20 (2019): Fall

Section

Articles

License

The JD Journal for Deradicalization uses a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND) Licence. You are free to share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under the following conditions: