Countering violent extremism in Indonesia: priorities, practice and the role of civil society
Keywords:Indonesia, Countering Violent Extremism, Civil Society
Indonesia has experimented with initiatives aimed at countering violent extremism (CVE) since the wave of arrests following the first Bali bombing attack in 2002. Initial efforts involved police attempting to develop relationships of trust with terrorists in custody. Today, a broader range of strategies are employed, from promoting peace among youth and thwarting the allure of extremist narratives, to managing prisoners and assisting former terrorists reintegrate with society. The lead government body since 2010 has been the national counterterrorism agency, Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Terorisme (BNPT), which is tasked with coordinating stakeholders in Indonesia’s struggle with domestic terrorism. But managing the divergent and sometimes competing interests of Indonesia’s large state institutions has not been straightforward, and effective collaboration between relevant state agencies remains an obstacle to the success of CVE initiatives. Where government has fallen short, civil society organisations (CSOs) often fill the gaps, and a number of dedicated practitioners now have invaluable experience, local contacts, and the specific knowledge required for countering extremism in the Indonesian context. CSOs also possess greater levels of trust among the communities they engage than security-centric state agencies could possibly hope to achieve. Yet instead of exploiting these civil society resources, the BNPT has largely preferred an independent (and top-down) approach to CVE initiatives, collaborating if and when assistance is required. The Indonesian government should make better use of the unique legitimacy and expertise of civil society organisations.
Al-Hadlaq, A. Terrorist rehabilitation: The Saudi experience. (2011). In R. Gunaratna, J. Jerard & L. Rubin (Eds.). Terrorist Rehabilitation and Counter-Radicalisation (pp. 59-69). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Alderdice, L.J. (2007). The individual, the group and the psychology of terrorism. International Review of Psychiatry. 19(3), 201-209.
Altier, M.B., Boyle, E.L., Shortland, N.D. & Horgan, J.G. (2017). Why They Leave: An Analysis of Terrorist Disengagement Events from Eighty-seven Autobiographical Accounts. Security Studies. 26(2), 305-332.
Altier, M.B., Thoroughgood, C.N. & Horgan, J.G. (2014). Turning away from terrorism: Lessons from psychology, sociology, and criminology. 51(5), 647-661.
Amalee, I., Anees, B.Q. & Darraz, M.A. (2014). 24 Minggu Menjadi Teladan Bangsa: Buku Agenda Pelajar Muslim. Jakarta: Maarif Institute.
Barrelle, K. (2015). Pro-integration: disengagement from and life after terrorism. Behavioural Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression. 7(2), 129-142.
Benar News (2017, May 22). At Saudi Summit, Muslim Nations Vow to Wipe Out Terrorism. http://www.benarnews.org/english/news/indonesian/muslim-summit-05222017172432.html (accessed 22/5/17).
Bjørgo, T. & Horgan, J. (2009). Leaving Terrorism Behind: Individual and collective disengagement. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Braddock, K. (2014). The Talking Cure? Communication and psychological impact in prison de-radicalisation programmes. In A. Silke (Ed.), Prisons, Terrorism and Extremism (pp. 60-74). New York: Routledge.
Brehm, J. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.
Caplan, G. (1964). Principles of preventive psychiatry. New York: Basic Books.
Chernov Hwang, J. (2017). The Disengagement of Indonesian Jihadists: Understanding the Pathways. Terrorism and Political Violence. 29(2), 277-295.
Chernov Hwang, J., Panggabean, R. & Fauzi, I.A. (2013). The Disengagement of Jihadis in Poso, Indonesia. Asian Survey. 53(4), 754-777.
Civil Society against Violent Extremism (C-Save). (2016). Draft Concept Note.
Deputi Bidan Pencegahan, Perlindungan dan Deradikalisasi, Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Terorisme (2013). Blueprint Deradikalisasi, 1-122.
Dalgaard-Nielsen, A. (2013). Promoting Exit from Violent Extremism: Themes and Approaches. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism. 36(2), 99-115.
Della Porta, D. & LaFree, G. (2012). Guest Editorial: Processes of Radicalization and De-Radicalization. International Journal of Conflict and Violence. 6(1), 4-10.
Direktorat Jenderal Pemasyarakatan, Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia & The United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute (2017). Grand Design and Road Map: Penanganan Warga Binaan Pemasyarakatan Risiko Tinggi (Draft Executive Summary), 1-57.
Gunaratna, R. (2011). Terrorist Rehabilitation: a global imperative. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 6(1), 65-85.
Halim, H. (2016, November 16). Kalimantan church bomber linked to IS movement. In The Jakarta Post. http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2016/11/14/kalimantan-church-bomber-linked-to-is-movement.html (accessed 16/11/16).
Harris, K.J., Gringart, E. & Drake, D. (2017). Leaving ideological groups behind: A model of disengagement. Behavioural Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression. 1-14.
Harris-Hogan, S., Barrelle, K. & Zammit, A. (2016). What is countering violent extremism? Exploring CVE policy and practice in Australia. Behavioural Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression 8(1), 6-24.
Hemmingsen, A. (2015). An Introduction to the Danish Approach to Countering and Preventing Extremism and Radicalization. Danish Institute for International Studies 16, 1-50.
Horgan, J. & Braddock, K. (2010). Rehabilitating the Terrorists? Challenges in Assessing the Effectiveness of Deradicalization Programs. Terrorism & Political Violence 22(2), 267-291.
Koehler, D. (2017). Understanding Deradicalization. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Idris, I. & Taufiqurrohman, M. (2015). Current State of Indonesia’s Deradicalisation and Rehabilitation Programme. In R. Gunaratna & M. Bin Ali (Eds.). Terrorist Rehabilitation: A New Frontier in Counter-terrorism (pp. 71-102). New Jersey: Imperial College Press.
Institute for Policy Analysis of Conflict (2014, June 30). Countering Violent Extremism in Indonesia: Need for a Rethink. IPAC Report No.11, 1-22.
Institute for Policy Analysis of Conflict (2015, January 19). Support for “Islamic State” in Indonesian Prisons. IPAC Report No. 15, 1-27.
Institute for Policy Analysis of Conflict (2015, May 25). The Expanding Role of the Indonesian Military. IPAC Report No.19, 1-21.
Institute for Policy Analysis of Conflict (2016, December 14). Update on Indonesian Pro-ISIS Prisoners and Deradicalisation Efforts. IPAC Report No.34, 1-20.
International Crisis Group (2007, November 19). “Deradicalisation” and Indonesian Prisons. Asia Report No. 142, 1-31.
Istiqomah, M. (2011). De-radicalisation program in Indonesian Prisons: Reformation on the Correctional Institution. Conference Report, Australia Counter Terrorism Conference, Edith Cowan University, 28-34.
Korn, J. (2016). European CVE Strategies from a Practitioner’s Perspective. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 668, 180-197.
Martin, D. (2007, September 20). Bali bomber now campaigns to stop terrorism. In Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC). http://www.abc.net.au/news/2007-09-20/bali-bomber-now-campaigns-to-stop-terrorism/676116 (accessed 06/11/15).
Marsden, S.V. (2015). Conceptualising ‘success’ with those convicted of terrorism offences: Aims, methods, and barriers to reintegration. Behavioural Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression 7(2), 143-165.
Osman, S. (2014). Convicted terrorists and Indonesian prisons. In A. Silke (Ed.), Prisons, Terrorism and Extremism (pp. 214-229). New York: Routledge.
Parlina, I. (2015, November 16). At G20, Jokowi urges stronger counterterrorism cooperation. In The Jakarta Post. http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2015/11/16/at-g20-jokowi-urges-stronger-counterterrorism-cooperation.html (accessed 14/11/16).
Rabasa, A., Pettyjohn, S.L., Ghez, J.J. & Boucek, C. (2010). Deradicalizing Islamist Extremists. RAND Monograph, 1-244.
Search for Common Ground (2016, April). Youth Ambassadors for Tolerance and Religious Diversity. Internal Summative Evaluation, 1-36.
Selim, G. (2016). Approaches for Countering Violent Extremism at Home and Abroad. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 668, 94-101.
Silke, A. (2008). Cheshire-cat logic: The recurring theme of terrorist abnormality in psychological research. Psychology, Crime & Law. 4(1), 51-69.
Silke, A. (2011). Disengagement or Deradicalization: A Look at Prison Programs for Jailed Terrorists. CTC Sentinel 4(1), 18-21.
Sudaryono, L. (2013, Jul-Sep). Overcrowding crisis. Inside Indonesia 113. http://www.insideindonesia.org/overcrowding-crisis (accessed 09/11/16).
Sulhin, I. (2010). Correctional governance: an Indonesian experience. Australasian Journal of Correctional Staff Development. http://csa.intersearch.com.au/csajspui/handle/10627/452 (accessed 15/11/16).
Tempo (2016, January 31). The Thamrin Terror Team.
Tempo (2016, August 14). Interview with Pol. Comr. Gen. Suhardi Alius, Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Terorisme (BNPT).
Tempo.co (2016, November 14). Ini Kata Tetangga Soal Juhanda Pelaku Bom Gereja Oikumene. https://m.tempo.co/read/news/2016/11/14/063820046/ini-kata-tetangga-soal-juhanda-pelaku-bom-gereja-oikumene (accessed 17/11/16).
Tempo.co (2016, November 19). Gov’t Encourages De-radicalization Program. http://en.tempo.co/read/news/2016/11/19/055821489/Govt-Encourages-De-radicalization-Program (accessed 19/11/16).
The Jakarta Post (2017, March 2). BNPT identifies 400 ex-terrorists ‘untouched’ by deradicalization program. http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2017/03/02/bnpt-identifies-400-ex-terrorists-untouched-by-deradicalization-program.html (accessed 2/3/17).
Veldhuis, T.M. (2015, October) Reintegrating Violent Extremist Offenders: Policy Questions and Lessons Learned. George Washington University Program on Extremism Occasional Paper, 1-11.
Williams, M.J. Horgan, J.G. & Evans, W.P. (2016). Evaluation of a Multi-Faceted, U.S. Community-Based, Muslim-Led CVE Program. Project awarded by the National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice. Award No. 2013-ZA-BX-0003, 1-165.
Williams, M.J. & Kleinman, S.M. (2013). A utilization-focused guide for conducting terrorism risk reduction program evaluations. Behavioural Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression 6(2), 102-146.
The JD Journal for Deradicalization uses a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND) Licence. You are free to share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under the following conditions:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, andindicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.