USE OF PEG SITE FOR SPECIMEN RETRIEVAL AND EXTRACORPOREAL GASTRIC CONDUIT FORMATION, IN MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY

  • Misbah Khan SKMCH&RC Lahore
  • Namra Urooj SKMCH&RC Lahore
  • Aamir A Syed SKMCH&RC Lahore
  • Shahid Khattak SKMCH&RC Lahore
  • Anam Muzzafar SKMCH&RC Lahore
  • Ijaz Ashraf SKMCH&RC Lahore

Abstract

Purpose: Purpose of the present study is to report our technique of the use of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) site excision biopsy wound, for specimen retrieval and gastric conduit formation, in minimally invasive oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.

Methods: It is a retrospective comparative study where we present data of our 100 resectable oesophageal cancer patients who underwent postneoadjuvant minimally invasive oesophagectomy from January 2012 to September 2015. All of the patients had an initial staging endoscopic ultrasound with PEG placement. The prestudy (conventional) approach, i.e., laparoscopic gastric conduit formation along with specimen pull up from the cervical/thoracic wound is compared to the present (Study) group.

Results: The two groups were similar for basic demographic variables, tumour stage, morphology and nutritional status. The primary endpoints were an operative time in minutes and any additional procedure-speci c complications. The rate of procedure speci c complications (Abdominal excision wound complications or conduit failure) was low 11%. PEG site excision biopsy was positive in two cases; one adenocarcinoma and one squamous carcinoma, both were mid to lower oesophageal tumours not involving gastroesophageal junction.

Conclusions: Bene ts of the approach are ease of gastric conduit formation along with an additional second layer with less operative time through the small wound, avoidance of tumour specimen removal all the way through mediastinum from the cervical incision, and excision of a potential site of oesophageal cancer metastasis, without any added morbidity.

Key words: Extracorporeal gastric conduit, minimally invasive oesophagectomy, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

References

Kobayashi T, Oshima K, Yokobori T, et al. Perioperative nutriture in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 2013;60:1311-6.

Löser C, Aschl G, Hébuterne X, et al. ESPEN guidelines on artificial enteral nutrition--percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). Clin Nutr 2005;24:848-61.

Sousa AL, Sousa D, Velasco F, et al. Rare complication of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: Ostomy metastasis of oesophageal carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2013; 5:204-6.

Kassir R, Cavaille A, Barabino G, et al. Metastasis of oropharyngeal carcinoma to the site of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: Literature review. J Curr Surg 2014; 4:46-8.

Cappell MS. Risk factors and risk reduction of malignant seeding of the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy track from pharyngoesophageal malignancy: A review of all 44 known reported cases. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102:1307-11.

Hearn M, Trull B, Hearn J, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube-associated metastasis in pharyngooesophageal malignancy. R Coll Surg Irel Stud Med J 2012;5:54-7.

Bhatti AB, Rizvi FH, Waheed A, et al. Does prior percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy alter post-operative outcome after esophagectomy. World J Surg 2015;39:441-5.

Berrisford RG. Minimally-invasive subtotal oesophagectomy: Three-stage thoracoscopic, laparoscopic subtotal oesophagectomy with cervical anastomosis. Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg 2011;2011:mmcts.2008.003566.

Wajed SA, Veeramootoo D, Shore AC. Video. Surgical optimisation of the gastric conduit for minimally invasive oesophagectomy. Surg Endosc 2012;26:271-6.

Palazzo F, Evans NR 3rd, Rosato EL. Minimally invasive esophagectomy with extracorporeal gastric conduit creation- how I do it. J Gastrointest Surg 2013;17:1683-8.

Berrisford RG, Wajed SA, Sanders D, et al. Short- term outcomes following total minimally invasive oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 2008;95:602-10.

Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: Outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 2003;238:486-94.

Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: Lessons learned from 104 operations. Ann Surg 2008;248:1081-91.

Veeramootoo D, Parameswaran R, Krishnadas R, et al. Classi cation and early recognition of gastric conduit failure after minimally invasive esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 2009; 23:2110-6.

Published
2016-05-05
How to Cite
1.
Khan M, Urooj N, Syed AA, Khattak S, Muzzafar A, Ashraf I. USE OF PEG SITE FOR SPECIMEN RETRIEVAL AND EXTRACORPOREAL GASTRIC CONDUIT FORMATION, IN MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY. J Cancer Allied Spec [Internet]. 2016May5 [cited 2020Aug.15];2(1). Available from: https://journals.sfu.ca/jcas/index.php/jcas/article/view/55
Section
Original Research Article