• Fozia Naz Radiology Department, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Lahore
  • Ahmed Murtaza Department of Radiology King Saud University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Khurram A Mufti Department of Radiology, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City Abu Dhabi, UAE
  • Zia S. Faruqui Radiology department, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Lahore
  • Humayun Bashir Nuclear Medicine Department, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital & Research Centre, Lahore


Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of integrated positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in detecting recurrent ovarian cancer in treated patients presenting with rising CA-125 levels during clinical follow-up and compare it with those of CT alone.

Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study. We evaluated 45 patients with pathologically proven ovarian carcinoma who underwent PET/CT during October 2010–November 2013 at our institution for suspected relapse; IRB deemed that approval for this retrospective study was not required. Of these, 35 patients who presented with rising CA-125 levels during clinical follow-up were included in this study. Remaining 10 patients were excluded as they had normal CA-125 levels. At least three previous consecutive CA-125 readings and initial conventional imaging before uorodeoxyglucose-PET/CT were noted. Sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy for tumour detection with PET/CT and CT alone were calculated; histological analysis after biopsy/second look surgery or clinical- radiologic follow-up/response to chemotherapy was taken as reference standard. K statistics (Cohen K) was used for statistical analysis.

Results: Of 35 patients with suspected relapse, one patient was lost to follow up. 30 patients were documented to have relapsed, while in four patients, recurrence was not identi ed either on CT or PET-CT and they were proved to be disease free on 2-year follow-up. Amongst these relapsed patients, 10/30 cases were proven histologically, 3 with imaging-guided biopsy and 7 with second-look surgery, whereas 20/30 were con rmed on clinical/radiological follow-up (ranging from 3 to 6 months) or by response to chemotherapy on subsequent imaging. Of 30 patients with relapse, PET-CT highlighted recurrence in 27. Sensitivity, speci city, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of integrated PET/CT were calculated to be 90%, 75%, 96%, 50%, and 88%, respectively. CT alone detected recurrence in 20 patients. Sensitivity, speci city, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of CT were calculated to be 73.3%, 100%, 100%, 33%, and 76%, respectively.

Conclusion: PET/CT is a highly sensitive and accurate post-therapy surveillance modality for the detection of recurrent ovarian cancer in patients with rising tumour markers as compared to CT alone.

Key words: CA125, uorodeoxyglucose, ovarian cancer, positron emission tomography/computed tomography, recurrence


Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009;59:225-49.

Stewart L, Advanced Ovarian Cancer Trialists Group. Chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer. Advanced ovarian cancer trialists group. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;2:CD001418.

Aabo K, Adams M, Adnitt P, et al. Chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: Four systematic meta-analyses of individual patient data from 37 randomized trials. Advanced ovarian cancer trialists’ group. Br J Cancer 1998;78: 1479-87.

García-Velloso MJ, Jurado M, Ceamanos C, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET in the follow-up of platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007;34:1396-405.

Högberg T, Kågedal B. Long-term follow-up of ovarian cancer with monthly determinations of serum CA 125. Gynecol Oncol 1992;46:191-8.

Santillan A, Garg R, Zahurak ML, et al. Risk of epithelial ovarian cancer recurrence in patients with rising serum CA-125 levels within the normal range. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:9338-43.

Buy JN, Moss AA, Ghossain MA, et al. Peritoneal implants from ovarian tumors: CT findings. Radiology 1988; 169:691-4.

Coakley FV, Choi PH, Gougoutas CA, et al. Peritoneal metastases: Detection with spiral CT in patients with ovarian cancer. Radiology 2002;223:495-9.

Kim HJ, Kim JK, Cho KS. CT features of serous surface papillary carcinoma of the ovary. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183:1721-4.

Qayyum A, Coakley FV, Westphalen AC, et al. Role of CT and MR imaging in predicting optimal cytoreduction of newly diagnosed primary epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2005;96:301-

PannuHK,BristowRE,CohadeC,etal.PET-CTinrecurrent ovarian cancer: Initial observations. Radiographics 2004; 24:209-23.

National Institutes of Health. Ovarian cancer: Screening, treatment and follow-up. NIH Consens Statement 1994;12:1-30.

Meyer T, Rustin GJ. Role of tumour markers in monitoring epithelial ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer 2000;82:1535-8.

Sugiyama T, Nishida T, Komai K, et al. Comparison of CA 125 assays with abdominopelvic computed tomography and transvaginal ultrasound in monitoring of ovarian cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1996;54:251-6.

Ferrazzi E, Zanetta G, Dordoni D, et al. Transvaginal ultrasonographic characterization of ovarian masses: Comparison of five scoring systems in a multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;10:192-7.

Gu P, Pan LL, Wu SQ, et al. CA 125, PET alone, PET-CT, CT and MRI in diagnosing recurrent ovarian carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 2009; 71:164-74.

How to Cite
Naz F, Murtaza A, Mufti KA, Faruqui ZS, Bashir H. ROLE OF INTEGRATED PET/CT IN DETECTING RECURRENT OVARIAN CANCER IN PATIENTS WITH RISING CA-125 LEVELS. J Cancer Allied Spec [Internet]. 2015Nov.1 [cited 2020Sep.21];1(2). Available from:
Original Research Article