Frontline Learning Research https://journals.sfu.ca/flr/index.php/journal <p>Frontline Learning Research (FLR) welcomes risk-taking and explorative studies that provide input for theoretical, empirical and/or methodological renewal within the field of research on learning and instruction. The journal offers a distinctive opening for foundational research and an arena for studies that promote new ideas, methodologies or discoveries. Read about what is frontline under <a href="https://journals.sfu.ca/flr/index.php/journal/about" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Aims and scope</a></p> en-US <p>FLR adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Creative Common License (BY-NC-ND). That is, Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors with, however, first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.</p> nina.dohn@frontlinelearningresearch.org (Nina B. Dohn) info@frontlinelearningresearch.org (Lore Verschakelen) Wed, 13 Apr 2022 05:48:16 -0700 OJS 3.3.0.10 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Preconditions of teachers’ collaborative practice https://journals.sfu.ca/flr/index.php/journal/article/view/911 <div> <p class="AbstractText"><span lang="EN-GB">Previous findings on the preconditions of teachers’ collaboration are inconsistent. This might be related to the research methods used to assess the teachers’ collaborative practice. Retrospective assessments by self-report on a relatively general level prevail. The validity of these self-reports is limited, however. In contrast, time-sampling methods have the potential to investigate collaborative practice specifically and longitudinally as a day-to-day process over time validly. But to date, no research on collaborative activities in schools based on time-sampling methods is available. In this study, we extended the current state of research by analysing the variability and preconditions of teachers’ collaboration at four secondary schools over three weeks based on time-sampling data collected by a newly developed online practice log. Recorded were collaborative activities outside of teaching with a focus on administrative and organisational tasks and on school subject-specific tasks. The results revealed that teachers’ collaborative activities varied significantly between weekdays, showing a linear decrease from Monday to Friday, regardless of the content of collaboration. Collaboration that focused on administrative-organisational tasks seemed to be quite stable over the weeks and was hardly influenced by teachers’ individual characteristics. Instead, collaborative activities that focused on school subject-specific tasks varied significantly between weeks; moreover, they were influenced by teachers’ leadership role and gender. The results indicate that rather stable routinised patterns of day-to-day collaboration over the weeks decrease the influence of teachers’ individual characteristics. Hence, by collecting data that is closer to content-specific day-to-day collaborative activities, time-sampling methods can be seen as a driver for new insights.</span></p> </div> Katharina Maag Merki, Urs Grob, Beat Rechsteiner, Ariane Rickenbacher, Andrea Wullschleger Copyright (c) 2022 Frontline Learning Research https://journals.sfu.ca/flr/index.php/journal/article/view/911 Wed, 13 Apr 2022 00:00:00 -0700