https://journals.sfu.ca:443/flr/index.php/journal/issue/feed Frontline Learning Research 2019-10-02T00:59:40-07:00 Thomas Martens thomas.martens@frontlinelearningresearch.org Open Journal Systems <p>Frontline Learning Research publishes articles with new ideas, methodologies or discoveries that might be risky but have potential to open up new avenues in the field of learning and instruction.</p> https://journals.sfu.ca:443/flr/index.php/journal/article/view/451 Processing and learning from multiple sources: A comparative case study of students with dyslexia working in a multiple source multimedia context 2019-08-16T05:50:09-07:00 Anette Andresen anette.andresen@isp.uio.no Øistein Anmarkrud oistein.anmarkrud@isp.uio.no Ladislao Salmerón ladislao.salmeron@uv.es Ivar Bråten ivar.braten@iped.uio.no <p>This study investigated how four 10th-grade students with dyslexia processed and integrated information across web pages and representations when learning in a multiple source multimedia context. Eye movement data showed that participants’ processing of the materials varied with respect to their initial exploration of the web pages, their overall processing time, and the linearity of their processing patterns, with post-learning interviews indicating the deliberate, strategic considerations underlying each participant’s processing pattern. Eye movement data in terms of fixation duration and percentage of regressions also corroborated the findings of formal, diagnostic assessments. Finally, it was found that participants differed with respect to how much factual information they learned from working with the materials and how well they were able to integrate information across the web pages and representations, with results suggesting particular problems with learning factual information and, at the same time, constructing a coherent mental representation of the issue, as well as with drawing on textual information in the integration process. This study brings together two research areas that essentially have been kept apart in theory and research, that is, dyslexia and multimedia learning, and it provides unique information about the role of individual differences in multiple source multimedia contexts.</p> 2019-07-16T00:00:00-07:00 ##submission.copyrightStatement## https://journals.sfu.ca:443/flr/index.php/journal/article/view/417 Epistemic Beliefs and Googling 2019-08-16T05:47:29-07:00 Tore Ståhl tore.stahl@gmail.com <p>With the introduction of internet as a source of information, parents have observed youngsters’ tendency to prefer internet as a source, and almost a reluctance to learn in advance since “you can look it up when needed”. Questions arise, such as ‘Are these phenomena symptoms of changing beliefs about knowledge and learning? Is it at all possible to learn on a deeper level simply by looking up the basic facts, without memorizing them?’<br><br>Within an existing line of investigation, epistemic beliefs have been described as a set of dimensions. Although internet-based information and internet as a source of information have been acknowledged, studies so far have not explored how dealing with internet-based information relates to other epistemic beliefs dimensions.<br><br>To capture how users view internet-based information per se but also in relation to other epistemic beliefs, I suggest three new dimensions, out of which the most crucial is labelled ‘Internet reliance’. Offloading memory using memory aids is not a new phenomenon but the ‘Internet reliance’ dimension indicates that especially internet-reliant users may be confusing external information with personal knowledge, with all the risks it may entail.<br><br>Besides including beliefs about learning, this study also challenges earlier assumptions regarding uncorrelated dimensions.</p> 2019-07-18T00:00:00-07:00 ##submission.copyrightStatement## https://journals.sfu.ca:443/flr/index.php/journal/article/view/459 It’s Better to Enjoy Learning than Playing: Motivational Effects of an Educational Live Action Role-playing Game 2019-08-16T05:42:51-07:00 Brom Cyril brom@ksvi.mff.cuni.cz Viktor Dobrovolný viktor.dobrovolny@gmail.com Filip Děchtěrenko filip.dechterenko@gmail.com Tereza Stárková tereza.starek@gmail.com Edita Bromová edita@email.com <p class="AbstractText"><span lang="EN-US">Game-based learning is supposed to motivate learners. However, to what degree does motivation driven by interest in playing an instructional game affect learning outcomes compared to motivation driven by interest in the very learning process? This is not known. In this study with a unique design and intervention, young adults (N = 128; a heterogeneous sample) learned how to control an electro-mechanical device in a 40-minute-long learning session integrated into a 2-hour-long educational live action role-playing game (edu-LARP). Edu-LARPs are supposedly engaging games where players take part in team role-playing by physically enacting characters in a fictional universe. In our edu-LARP, players had to understand how the to-be-learned device worked in order to win the game. Departing from typical game-based learning research, learning- and playing-related variables were assessed for each learner separately (i.e., a within-subject design). Affective-motivational factors related to playing (rather than learning) predicted learning outcomes in a positive, but considerably weaker, way compared to learning-related, affective-motivational factors. Developed interest in LARP-like games was primarily related to enjoying the game rather than better learning outcomes; whereas, developed interest in the instructional domain was primarily related to enjoyment of learning and better learning outcomes. Overall, autonomous motivation to play was connected to higher learning outcomes, but this connection was weak.</span></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> 2019-08-16T00:00:00-07:00 ##submission.copyrightStatement## https://journals.sfu.ca:443/flr/index.php/journal/article/view/503 Measuring academic learning and exam self-efficacy at admission to university and its relation to first-year attrition 2019-10-02T00:59:40-07:00 Tine Nielsen tine.nielsen@psy.ku.dk Ida Sophie Friderichsen isf@psy.ku.dk Bjarke Tarpgaard Hartkopf bhf@eva.dk <p>Self-efficacy is associated with both academic performance and attrition in higher education. Whether it is possible to measure students’ academic self-efficacy after admission and prior to commencing higher education (i.e. pre-academic self-efficacy) in a valid and reliable way has hardly been studied. Aims: 1) to evaluate the construct validity and psychometric properties of two short scales to measure Pre-Academic Learning Self-Efficacy (PAL-SE) and Pre-Academic Exam Self-Efficacy (PAE-SE) using Rasch measurement models, 2) to investigate whether pre-academic self-efficacy was associated with half-year attrition across degree programs and institutions. Data consisted of 2686 Danish students admitted to nine different university degree programs across two institutions. Item analyses showed both scales to be essentially objective and construct valid, however, all items from the PAE-SE and two from the PAL-SE were locally dependent. Differential item functioning was found for the PAL-SE&nbsp; relative to degree programs. Reliability of the PAE-SE was .77, and varied for the PAL-SE&nbsp; from .79 to .86 across degree programs. Targeting was good only for the PAL-SE, thus we proceeded with the PAL-SE. PAL-SE was found to be associated with half-year attrition: A difference in PAL-SE from minimum to maximum was associated with a difference in half-year attrition of approximately 7%. This association was found both in the bivariate model and in the multivariate models with control of degree program, and with control of degree program and individual covariates such as earlier educational achievement and social background variables. Results thus also indicate that PAL-SE has a causal effect on half-year attrition.</p> 2019-10-02T00:00:00-07:00 ##submission.copyrightStatement##