Main Article Content
This study was aimed at mapping features of constructivist activities in higher education settings, constructing and validating a new scale for measuring their presence in lecture face-to-face based environments (LBE), seminars (SM), and distance learning environments (DLE). A mix-method approach was implemented in three phases. The first phase was aimed at qualitatively analysing classroom observational activities as experienced by students, in order to learn about actual instantiations of the theoretical constructivist features. The results foregrounded eight categories: 'knowledge construction', 'authenticity', 'multiple perspectives', 'prior knowledge', 'in-depth learning', 'teacher- student interaction', 'social interaction' and 'cooperative dialogue'. The second phase was aimed at developing a questionnaire, based on the descriptions gathered in Phase 1. The third quantitative phase was used to validate the developed questionnaire (Constructivist Learning in Higher Education Settings scale [CLHES]) by using structural equation modelling. In addition, students' academic self-efficacy had been chosen as a criterion variable in order to further assess construct validity of the CLHES. Lastly, a multivariate analysis of covariance was applied to allow the characterisation of differences between the learning settings in regard to the CLHES eight factors and academic self-efficacy. The scales were submitted to 597 undergraduate third-year college students. According to the main results: construct validity of the new scale has been confirmed; teacher-student and student-student interactions were positively connected to self-efficacy for learning; and SM were perceived as generally more constructivist when compared with the other learning environments. Implications of these findings and directions for future research are discussed.
FLR adopts the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Creative Common License (BY-NC-ND). That is, Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors with, however, first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.
Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2010). Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 5, 243-260. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2010.06.001
Bakhtin, M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. (C. Emerson, Ed. & Trans.). Minnieapolis: University of Michigan Press.
Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4, 359-373. doi: 10.1521/jscp.19126.96.36.1999
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children’s aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72(1), 187-206. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00273
Barak, M., & Dori, Y. J. (2009). Enhancing higher order thinking skills among in-service science teachers via embedded assessment. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(5), 459 - 474.
Bentler, P. M. (2006). EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc.
Biggs, J. B., Kember, D., & Leung, D.Y.P. (2001). The Revised Two Factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133-149. doi: 10.1348/000709901158433
Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1999). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self- regulation and other mysterious mechanisms. In F. Weinert & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding (pp. 65–115). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105. doi: 10.1037/h0046016
Cano, F., & García-Berbén, A-B. (2014). University students' achievement goals and approaches to learning in mathematics: A re-analysis investigating 'learning patterns'. In D. Gijbels, V. Donche, J. T. E. Richardson, & J. D. Vermunt (Eds.), Learning patterns in higher education: Dimensions and research perspectives (pp. 163 – 186). London and New York: Routledge and EARLI.
Carroll, A., Houghton, S., Wood, R., Unsworth, K. L., Hattie, J., Gordon, L., & Bower, J. (2009). Self-efficacy and academic achievement in Australian high school students: The mediating effects of academic aspirations and delinquency. Journal of Adolescence, 32(4), 797-817. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.10.009
Central Bureau of Statistics. (2011). Women in higher education. Retrieved December 21, 2012 from http://www1.cbs.gov.il/www/publications/desc_exp/women.pdf (Hebrew)
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46. doi: 10.1177/001316446002000104
Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. New York: Academic Press.
Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 558–577.
Council for Higher Education. (2009). Planning and Budgeting Committee 34/35 report. Retrieved July 20, 2010 from http://www.che.org.il/download/files /contents_1.pdf (Hebrew)
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Educational research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
De Kock, A., Sleegers, P., & Voeten, M. J. M. (2004). New learning and the classification of learning environments in secondary education. Review of Educational Research, 74(2), 141-170. doi: 10.3102/00346543074002141 Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Touchstone.
Dochy, F. J. R. C., & Alexander, P. A. (1995). Mapping prior knowledge: A framework for discussion among researchers. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10, 225-242. doi: 10.1007/BF03172918
Donche, V., Coertjens, L., Van Daal, T., De Maeyer, S., & Van Petegem, P. (2014). Understanding differences in student learning and academic achievement in first year higher education: An integral research perspective. In D. Gijbels, V. Donche, J. T. E. Richardson, & J. D. Vermunt (Eds.), Learning patterns in higher education: Dimensions and research perspectives (pp. 214 – 231). London and New York: Routledge and EARLI.
Doolittle, P. E., & Camp, W. G. (1999). Constructivism: The career and technical education perspective. Journal of Vocational and Technical Education, 16(1), 23-46. Retrieved from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JVTE/v16n1/doolittle.html
Dorman, J. P., & Adams, J. (2004). Associations between students' perceptions of classroom environment and academic efficacy in Australian and British secondary schools. Westminster Studies in Education, 27, 69 – 85. doi: 10.1080/0140672040270106
Dorman, J. P., Fisher, D., & Waldrip, B. (2006). Classroom environment student` perceptions of assessment, academic efficacy and attitude to science. A LISREL analysis. In D. L. Fisher & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to research on learning environments: World views (pp. 1 -28). Singapore: World Scientific.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
Entwistle, N. J., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.
Erstad, O. (2011). Weaving the context of digital literacy. In S. Ludvigsen, A. Lund, I. Rasmussen & R. Säljö (Eds.), Learning across sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices (pp. 295-310). London: Routledge.
Evans, C. (2014). Exploring the use of a deep approach to learning with students in the process of learning to teach. In D. Gijbels, V. Donche, J. T. E. Richardson, & J. D. Vermunt (Eds.), Learning patterns in higher education: Dimensions and research perspectives (pp. 187 – 213). London and New York: Routledge and EARLI.
Fraser, B. J., Treagust, D. F., Williamson, J. C., & Tobin, K. G. (1987). Validation and application of the college and university classroom environment inventory (CUCEI). In B. J. Fraser (Ed.), The study of learning environments (pp. 17-30). Perth, Western Australia: Curtin University of Technology.
Gellin, A. (2003). The effect of undergraduate student involvement on critical thinking: A meta- analysis of the literature 1991–2000. Journal of College Student Development, 44, 745–762. doi:10.1353/csd.2003.0066
Gijbels, D., Segers, M., & Struyf, E. (2008). Constructivist learning environments and the (im)possibility to change students’ perceptions of assessment demands and approaches to learning. Instructional Science, 36, 431–443. doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9064-7
Gijbels, D., van de Watering, G., Dochy, F., & van den Bossche, P. (2006). New learning environments and constructivism: The students' perspective. Instructional Science, 34(3), 213-226. doi:10.1007/s11251-005-3347-z
Hakkarainen, K., Lipponen, L., & Järvelä, S. (2002). Epistemology of inquiry and computer supported collaborative learning. In T. Koschmann, N. Miyake & R. Hall (Eds.), CSCL2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 129–156). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Jacobs, H. H. (1989). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. Alexandria, VA: ASDC.
Järvelä, S., Hurme, T.-R., & Järvenoja, H. (2011). Self- regulation and motivation in computer- supported collaborative learning environments. In S. Ludvigsen, A. Lund, I. Rasmussen & R. Säljö (Eds.), Learning across sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices (pp. 330-345). London: Routledge.
King, T. (2002, July). Development of student skills in reflective writing. Paper presented at the 4th World Conference of the International Consortium for Educational Development in Higher Education, Perth, Australia. doi: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.136.2518
Kyndt, E., Dochy, F., & Cascallar, E. (2014). Students' approaches to learning in higher education: The interplay between context and student. In D. Gijbels, V. Donche, J. T. E. Richardson, & J. D. Vermunt (Eds.), Learning patterns in higher education: Dimensions and research perspectives (pp. 249 – 272). London and New York: Routledge and EARLI.
Lahn, L. C. (2011). Professional learning as epistemic trajectories. In S. Ludvigsen, A. Lund, I. Rasmussen & R. Säljö (Eds.), Learning across sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices (pp. 53-68). London: Routledge.
Lea, S., Stephenson, D., & Troy, J. (2003). Higher education students' attitudes to student-centred learning: beyond 'educational bulimia'. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 321-333. doi:10.1080/03075070309293
Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School Psychology Review, 31, 313-327. Retrieved from http://prof.usb.ve/jjramirez/PREGRADO/CCP114/CCP114%20Motivacion%20Linnenbrink%20y%20Pintrich.pdf
Loyens, S. M. M., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Schmidt, H. G. (2008). Relationships between students’ conceptions of constructivist learning and their regulation and processing strategies. Instructional Science, 36, 445–462. doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9065-6
Lueddeke, G. R. (2003). Professionalising teaching practice in higher education: A study of disciplinary variation and ‘teaching-scholarship’. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 213-228. doi:
Lund, A., & Hauge, T. E. (2011). Changing objects in knowledge-creation practices. In S. Ludvigsen, A. Lund, I. Rasmussen & R. Säljö (Eds.), Learning across sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices (pp. 206-221). London: Routledge.
McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64 – 82. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.64. 64
Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
Meyer, H. (2004). Novice and expert teachers' conceptions of learners' prior knowledge. Science Education, 88(6), 970 - 983. doi: 10.1002/sce.20006
Minick, N., Stone, C. A., & Forman, E. A. (1993). Introduction: Integration of individual, social, and institutional processes in accounts of children's learning and development. In E. A. Forman, N. Minick, & C. A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development (pp. 3 - 15). New York: Oxford University Press.
Nave, H. (1991). In favour of the frontal teaching. The Israeli Ministry of Education: The Division for Curriculum Planning and Development. Retrieved from http://www.education.gov.il/tochniyot_limudim/sifrut/asi12020.htm (Hebrew)
Östlund, B. (2008). Prerequisites for interactive learning in distance education: Perspectives from Swedish students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 42-56. Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall163/ekstrand164.html
Packer, M. J., & Goicoechea, J. (2001). Sociocultural and constructivist theories of learning: Ontology, not just epistemology. Educational Psychologist, 35, 227–241. doi: 10.1207/S15326985EP3504_02
Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (Eds.). (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington, D.C: The National Academies Press.
Perret-Clermont , A.-N., & Perret, J.-F. (2011). A new artifact in the trade: notes on the arrival of a computer supported manufacturing system in a technical school. In S. Ludvigsen, A. Lund, I. Rasmussen & R. Säljö (Eds.), Learning across sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices (pp. 87-102). London: Routledge.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & Mckeachie, W. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801-813. doi: 10.1177/0013164493053003024
Popkewitz, T. S. (1998). Dewey, Vygotsky and the Social Administration of the Individual: Constructivist pedagogy as systems of ideas in historical spaces. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 535–570. doi:10.3102/00028312035004535
Quisumbing, L. R. (2005). Education for the world of work and citizenship: Towards sustainable future societies. Prospects: Quarterly review of comparative education, 35, 289–301. doi: 10.1007/s11125-005-4266-0
Resnick, L. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Richardson, J. T. E. (2011). Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educational Research Review, 6, 135–147. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.12.001
Schunk, D. H., & Miller, S. D. (2002). Self-efficacy and adolescents’ motivation. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Academic motivation of adolescents (pp. 29-52). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Schwarz, B. (2009). Argumentation and learning. In N. Muller- Mirza & A.- N. Perret-Clermont (Eds.), Argumentation and education – theoretical foundations and practices (pp. 91–126). New York and London: Springer.
Schwarz, B., & De Groot, R. (2011). Breakdowns between teachers, educators and designers in elaborating new technologies as precursors of change in education to dialogic thinking. In S. Ludvigsen, A. Lund, I. Rasmussen & R. Säljö (Eds.), Learning across sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices (pp. 261-277). London: Routledge.
Stahl, G. (2011). Social practices of group cognition in virtual match teams. In S. Ludvigsen, A. Lund, I. Rasmussen & R. Säljö (Eds.), Learning across sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices (pp. 190-205). London: Routledge.
Steffe, L. P., & Gale, J. (1995). Constructivism in education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tenenbaum, G., Naidu, S., Jegede, O., & Austin, J. (2001). Constructivist pedagogy in conventional on-campus and distance learning practice: An exploratory investigation. Learning and Instruction 11, 87–111. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00017-7
Tiwari, A., Chan, S., Wong, E., Wong, D., Chui, C., Wong, A., & Patil, N. (2006). The effect of problem-based learning on students’ approaches to learning in the context of clinical nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 26, 430-438. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2005.12.001
Tynjälä, P. (1999). Towards expert knowledge? A comparison between a constructivist and a traditional learning environment in the university. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 355–442. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00012-9
Van Dinther, M., Dochy, F., & Segers, M. (2011). Factors affecting students’ self-efficacy in higher education. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 95–108. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2010.10.003
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wegerif, R. (2007). Dialogic, education and technology: Expanding the space of learning. New York: Springer.
Wegerif, R., & De Laat, M. (2011). Using Bakhtin to re- think the teaching of higher-order thinking for the network society. In S. Ludvigsen, A. Lund, I. Rasmussen & R. Säljö (Eds.), Learning across sites: New tools, infrastructures and practices (pp. 313-329). London: Routledge.
White, R. T., & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing understanding. London: The Falmer Press.
Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 131–175. doi: 10.3102/00346543072002131
Wyatt, T. H., Krauskopf, P. B., Gaylord, N. M., Ward, A., Huffstutler-Hawkins, S., & Goodwin, L. (2010). Cooperative M-learning with nurse practitioner students. Nursing Education Perspectives, 31(2), 109-113. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1043/1536-5026-31.2.109