Mood Moderates the Effect of Self-Generation During Learning

Main Article Content

Julia Schindler
Tobias Richter
Carolin Eyßer

Abstract

Generating information, compared to reading, improves learning and enhances long-term retention of the learned content. This so-called generation effect has been demonstrated repeatedly for recall and recognition of single words. However, before adopting generating as a learning strategy in educational contexts, conditions moderating the effect need to be identified. This study investigated the impact of positive and negative mood states on the generation effect with short expository texts. According to the dual-force framework (Fiedler, Nickel, Asbeck, & Pagel, 2003), positive mood should facilitate generation by enhancing creative knowledge-based top-down processing (assimilation). Negative mood, however, should facilitate learning in the read-condition by enhancing critical stimulus-driven bottom-up processing (accommodation). In contrast to our expectations, we found no general generation effect but an overall learning advantage of read compared to generated texts. However, a significant interaction of learning condition and mood indicates that learners in a better mood recall generated texts better than learners in a more negative mood, whereas no mood effect was found when the texts were read. The results of the present study partially support the predictions of the dual-force framework and are discussed in the context of recent theoretical approaches to the generation effect.

Article Details

How to Cite
Schindler, J., Richter, T., & Eyßer, C. (2017). Mood Moderates the Effect of Self-Generation During Learning. Frontline Learning Research, 5(4), 76-88. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v5i4.296
Section
Articles

References

Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005

Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., Christensen, R. H. B., & Sigmann, H. (2014). Lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4 [Software]. R-package version 1.1-6. Retrieved May 1, 2014 from: http://cran.r-project.org/package=lme4

Bertsch, S., Pesta, B. J., Wiscott, R., & McDaniel, M. A. (2007). The generation effect: A meta-analytic review. Memory & Cognition, 35, 201–210. doi:10.3758/BF03193441

Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2011). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In M. A. Gernsbacher, R. W. Pew, L. M. Hough, & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society (pp.56–64). New York: Worth Publishers.

Bless, H., & Fiedler, K. (2005). Mood and the regulation of information processing and behavior. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Affect in social thinking and behavior (pp.65–84). New York: Psychology Press.

Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Bowers, C. A., & Stevens, D. T. (1984). Memory for prose: The influence of relational and proposition-specific processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory, and Cognition, 10, 133–143. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.10.1.133

Fiedler, K. (2001). Affective states trigger processes of assimilation and accommodation. In L. L. Martin & G. L. Clore (Eds.), Theories of mood and cognition: A user’s guidebook (pp.85–98). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Fiedler, K., Lachnit, H., Fay, D., & Krug, C. (1992). Mobilization of cognitive resources and the generation effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A, 45, 149–171. doi:10.1080/14640749208401320

Fiedler, K., Nickel, S., Asbeck, J., & Pagel, U. (2003). Mood and the generation effect. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 585–608. doi:10.1080/02699930302301

Graesser, A. C., Millis, K. K., & Zwaan, R. A. (1997). Discourse comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 163–189. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.163

Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2014). lmerTest: tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models (lmer objects of lme4 package). R-package version 2.06. Retrieved in June 2014 from: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lmerTest/index.html

Mazur, J. E. (2006). Lernen und Verhalten [Learning and behavior] (6th edition). München: Pearson Studium.

McDaniel, M. A. (1984). The role of elaborative and schema processes in story memory. Memory & Cognition, 12, 46–51. doi:10.3758/BF03196996

McDaniel, M. A., & Butler, A. C. (2010). A contextual framework for understanding when difficulties are desirable. In A. S. Benjamin (Ed.), Successful remembering and successful forgetting: A festschrift in honor of Robert A. Bjork (pp.175-198). New York: Taylor and Francis.

McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2005). Material appropriate difficulty: A framework for determining when difficulty is desirable for improving learning. In A. F. Healy (Ed.), Experimental cognitive psychology and its applications (pp.73–85). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O., Dunay, P. K., & Cobb, R. E. (1986). Encoding difficulty and memory: Toward a unifying theory. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 645–656. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(86)90041-0

McDaniel, M. A., & Kerwin, M. L. (1987). Long‐term prose retention: Is an organizational schema sufficient? Discourse Processes, 10, 237–252. doi:10.1080/01638538709544674

McDaniel, M. A., Waddil, P. J., & Einstein, G. O. (1988). A contextual account of the generation effect: A three-factor theory. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 521–536. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(88)90023-X

Robinson, O., Grillon, C., & Sahakian, B. (2012). The mood induction task: A standardized, computerized laboratory procedure for altering mood state in humans. Protocol Exchange, 10. doi:10.1038/protex.2012.007

Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1-36. Retrieved in February 2017 from: http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/

Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592–604. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.4.6.592

Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.

Velten, E. (1968). A laboratory task for induction of mood states. Behavioural Research and Therapy, 6, 473–482. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(68)90028-4