Diagrams support revision of prior belief in primary-school children

Main Article Content

Susanne Koerber
Christopher Osterhaus
Beate Sodian

Abstract

The reluctance of children to revise their prior beliefs is a prominent phenomenon in the reasoning literature. One way to facilitate belief change is offering explanations, and this study examined whether highlighting (counter)evidence with diagrams leads to belief revision to the same extent. Altogether 134 preschoolers and second-graders (5- and 7-year-olds, respectively) were presented with either counterintuitive data or explanations, both refuting a strong commonly held belief concerning the relation between two variables (e.g. eating carrots improves vision). In the explanation condition, we presented children with an explanatory underlying mechanism for the unexpected causal relation (e.g. spinach and carrots contain the same amount of vitamin A, with both improving vision). In the diagram condition, children were presented with empirical data displayed in a bar graph (non-covariation), which also disconfirmed the initial belief. In both age groups and both conditions we found significant numbers of belief revision with high certainty ratings concerning the new belief. Belief change was more pronounced in second-graders, who in addition showed significantly more changes in the diagram condition than in the explanation condition. These findings suggest that the perceptual saliency of (counter)evidence helps children to correctly evaluate hypotheses, which supports changes in their prior belief.

Article Details

How to Cite
Koerber, S., Osterhaus, C., & Sodian, B. (2017). Diagrams support revision of prior belief in primary-school children. Frontline Learning Research, 5(1), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v5i1.265
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Susanne Koerber, Freiburg University of Education, Germany

Professor of Early Eduaction

Psychology

Beate Sodian, University of Munich (LMU)

Psychology, Professor

References

Amsel, E., & Brock, S. (1996). The development of evidence evaluation skills. Cognitive Development, 11, 523-550. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(96)90016-7
Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63, 1-49.
Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Children's responses to anomalous scientific data: How is conceptual change impeded? Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 327-343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.327
Croker, S., & Buchanan, H. (2011). Scientific reasoning in a real‐world context: The effect of prior belief and outcome on children's hypothesis‐testing strategies. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29(3), 409-424. DOI: 10.1348/026151010X496906
Hegarty, M. (2011). The cognitive science of visual-spatial displays: implications for design. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(3), 446–474. DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01150.x
Klaczynski, P. A. (2001). Analytic and heuristic processing influences on adolescent reasoning and decision‐making. Child Development, 72, 844-861. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00319
Koerber, S. (2003). Der Einfluss externer Repräsentationsformen auf proportionales Denken im Grundschulalter. The influence of external forms of representation on proportional reasoning in elementary school age. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovac.
Koerber, S., Sodian, B., Thoermer, C., & Nett, U. (2005). Scientific reasoning in young children. Preschoolers’ ability to evaluate covariation evidence. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 64, 141-152. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185.64.3.141
Koerber, S., & Sodian, B. (2008). Preschool children’s ability to visually represent relations. Developmental Science, 11, 390-395. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00683.x
Amsel, E., & Brock, S. (1996). The development of evidence evaluation skills. Cognitive Development, 11, 523-550. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(96)90016-7
Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63, 1-49.
Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Children's responses to anomalous scientific data: How is conceptual change impeded? Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 327-343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.327
Croker, S., & Buchanan, H. (2011). Scientific reasoning in a real‐world context: The effect of prior belief and outcome on children's hypothesis‐testing strategies. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29(3), 409-424. DOI: 10.1348/026151010X496906
Hegarty, M. (2011). The cognitive science of visual-spatial displays: implications for design. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(3), 446–474. DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01150.x
Klaczynski, P. A. (2001). Analytic and heuristic processing influences on adolescent reasoning and decision‐making. Child Development, 72, 844-861. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00319
Koerber, S. (2003). Der Einfluss externer Repräsentationsformen auf proportionales Denken im Grundschulalter. The influence of external forms of representation on proportional reasoning in elementary school age. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovac.
Koerber, S., Sodian, B., Thoermer, C., & Nett, U. (2005). Scientific reasoning in young children. Preschoolers’ ability to evaluate covariation evidence. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 64, 141-152. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185.64.3.141
Koerber, S., & Sodian, B. (2008). Preschool children’s ability to visually represent relations. Developmental Science, 11, 390-395. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00683.x
Kosslyn, S. M. (1989). Understanding charts & graphs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 3, 185–226. DOI: 10.1002/acp.2350030302
Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Elements of graph design. New York: W. H. Freeman.
Kosslyn, S. M. (2006). Graph design for the eye and mind. New York: Oxford University Press
Koslowski, B. (1996). Theory and evidence: The development of scientific reasoning. MIT Press.
Koslowski, B. (2012). Scientific reasoning: Explanation, confirmation bias and scientific practice. In G. Feist & M. Gorman (Eds.), Handbook of the Psychology of Science and Technology (pp 151-192). Dordrecht: Springer.
Koslowski, B., Marasia, J., Chelenza, M., & Dublin, R. (2008). Information becomes evidence when an explanation can incorporate it into a causal framework. Cognitive Development, 23(4), 472-487. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.09.007
Kuhn, D. (2010). What is scientific thinking and how does it develop? In U. Goswami (Ed.). Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development (2nd ed., pp. 472-534). Oxford, England. Blackwell.
Kuhn, D., Amsel, E., & O'Loughlin, M. (1988). The development of scientific reasoning skills. Orlando, CA: Academic.
Larkin, J., & Simon, H. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65–99. DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6708.1987.tb00863.x
Legare, C. H. (2012). Exploring explanation: Explaining inconsistent evidence informs exploratory, hypothesis‐testing behavior in young children. Child Development, 83, 173-185. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01691.x
Masnick, A. M., Klahr, D., & Knowles, E. R. (2016). Data-driven belief revision in children and adults. Journal of Cognition and Development, (just-accepted). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2016.1168824
Mayer, D., Sodian, B., Koerber, S., & Schwippert, K. (2014). Scientific reasoning in elementary school children: Assessment and relations with cognitive abilities. Learning and Instruction, 29, 43-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.005
Piekny, J., & Maehler, C. (2013). Scientific reasoning in early and middle childhood: The development of domain‐general evidence evaluation, experimentation, and hypothesis generation skills. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 31(2), 153-179. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.2012.02082.x
Ruffman, T., Perner, J., Olson, D. R., & Doherty, M. (1993). Reflecting on scientific thinking: Children's understanding of the hypothesis‐evidence relation. Child Development, 64, 1617-1636. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb04203.x
Sandoval, W. A., Sodian, B., Koerber, S., & Wong, J. (2014). Developing children's early competencies to engage with science. Educational Psychologist, 49, 139-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.917589
van der Graaf, J., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2016). Scientific reasoning in kindergarten: Cognitive factors in experimentation and evidence evaluation. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 190-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.06.006