The Professional Identity of Three Innovative Teachers Engaging in Sustained Knowledge Building Using Technology

Main Article Content

Barbara Vokatis
Jianwei Zhang

Abstract

Diffusing inquiry-based pedagogy in schools for deep and lasting change requires teacher transformation and capacity building. This study characterizes the professional identity of three elementary school teachers who have productively engaged in inquiry-based classroom practice using knowledge building pedagogy and Knowledge Forum, a collaborative online environment. Grounded theory analysis of teacher interviews, supplemented with field observations, highlights five distinctive features of the teachers’ identity: (a) Teachers as professional knowledge builders to explore new visions of teaching for continual improvement of knowledge building; (b) Teachers as co-learners to form symmetrical relationships with students so they can take on the highest level of responsibility; (c) Teachers as problem-solvers and barrier-breakers holding a proactive stance toward the contexts of practice; (d) Teachers as members of a professional community that encourages collaboration, innovation, and continual improvement; and (e) An empowering relationship with the Principal who supports teacher innovation and collaboration. 

Article Details

How to Cite
Vokatis, B., & Zhang, J. (2016). The Professional Identity of Three Innovative Teachers Engaging in Sustained Knowledge Building Using Technology. Frontline Learning Research, 4(1), 58–77. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v4i1.223
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Barbara Vokatis, State University of New York at Oneonta

Assistant Professor in the Elementary Education and Reading Department

Jianwei Zhang, State University of New York at Albany

Associate Professor and Chair in the Educational Theory and Practice Department

References

Antonek, J. L., McCormick, D. E., & Donato, R. (1997). The student teacher portfolio as autobiography: Developing a professional identity. The Modern Language Journal, 81(1), 15–27. DOI: 10.2307/329158
Barbour, R. (2001). Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? British Medical Journal, 322, 1115–1117. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115
Barry, C. A., Britten, N., Barber, N., Bradley, C., & Stevenson, F. (1999). Using reflexivity to optimize teamwork in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, (9)1, 26–44.
Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: an overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175–189. DOI:10.1080/03057640902902252
Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers' professional identity. Teaching & Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 20(2), 107–128. DOI:10.1016/j.tate.2003.07.001
Belland, B. R., Glazewski, K. D., & Richardson, J. C. (2008). A scaffolding framework to support the construction of evidence-based arguments among middle school students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(4), 401–422. DOI:10.1007/s11423-007-9074-1
Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bransford, J., Darling-Hammond, L., & LePage, P. (2005). Introduction. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 1–39). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Brooke, G. E. (1994). My personal journey toward professionalism. Young Children, 49(6), 69–71.
Brush, T., & Saye, J. (2000). Implementation and evaluation of a student-centered learning unit: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3),79–100.
Chan, C. K. K. (2011). Bridging research and practice: Implementing and sustaining knowledge building in Hong Kong classrooms. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(2), 147–186. DOI:10.1007/s11412-011-9121-0
Clandinin, D. J. & Huber, M. (2005). Shifting stories to live by: interweaving the personal and the professional in teachers’ lives. In D. Beijaard, P. Meijer, G. Morine-Dershimer, & H. Tillema (Eds.), Teacher professional development in changing conditions (pp. 43–61). Dordrecht: Springer.
Coffey, A., & Aktinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cohen, D. K. (1989). Teaching practice: Plus que ca change....In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Contributing to educational change: Perspectives on research and practice (pp. 27–84). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Coldron, J., & Smith, R. (1999). Active location in teachers’ construction of their professional identities. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(6), 711–726. DOI:10.1080/002202799182954
Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (2000). Shaping a professional identity: Stories of education practice. London, ON: Althouse Press.
Coyne, I., & Cowley, S. (2006). Using grounded theory to research parent participation. Journal of Research in Nursing, 11(6), 501–515. DOI: 10.1177/1744987106065831
Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 916–937. DOI: 10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<916::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-2
Crawford, V. M., Schlager, M., Toyama, Y., Riel, M., & Vahey, P. (2005, April). Characterizing adaptive expertise in science teaching: Report on a laboratory study of teacher reasoning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
Davis, E. (2006). Characterizing productive reflection among preservice elementary teachers: Seeing what matters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 281–301. DOI:10.1016/j.tate.2005.11.005
Denzin, N. K. (2002). The interpretive process. In M. Huberman & M. B. Miles (Eds.), The qualitative researcher’s companion (pp. 340–368). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dillabough, J. A. (1999). Gender politics and conceptions of the modern teacher: Women, identity and professionalism. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(3), 373–394.
Duffy, G. (2005). Metacognition and the development of reading teachers. In C. Block, S. Israel, K. Kinnucan-Welsch, & K. Bauserman (Eds.), Metacognition and literacy learning (pp. 299–314). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dunne, C. (2011). The place of the literature review in grounded theory research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(2), 111–124. DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2010.494930
Enyedy, N., Goldberg, J, & Welsh, K. M. (2005). Complex dilemmas of identity and practice. Science Education, 90(1), 68–93. DOI 10.1002/sce.20096
Fairbanks, C. M., Duffy, G. G., Faircloth, B. S., Ye, H., Levin, B., Rohr, J., & Stein, C. (2010). Beyond knowledge: Exploring why some teachers are more thoughtfully adaptive than others. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1/2), 161–171. DOI: 10.1177/0022487109347874
Fishman, B. J., Davis, E.A., & Chan, C. K.K. (2014). A learning sciences perspective on teacher learning research. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (2nd ed., pp.750–769). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gee, J. P. (2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. In W. G. Secada (Ed.), Review of research in education, Vol. 25 (pp. 99–125). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Gee, J., & Crawford, V. (1998). Two kinds of teenagers: Language, identity, and social class. In D. Alvermann, K. Hinchman, D. Moore, S. Phelps, & D. Waff (Eds.), Reconceptualizing the literacies in adolescents’ lives (pp. 225–245). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Henwood, K., & Pidgeon, N. (2006). Grounded theory. In G. M. Breakwell, S. Hammond, C. Fife-Shaw, & J. A. Smith (Eds.), Research methods in psychology (3rd ed., pp. 342–365). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hjalmarson, M. A., & Diefes-Dux, H. (2008). Teacher as designer: A framework for teacher analysis of mathematical model-eliciting activities. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 2(1), 57–78. DOI:10.7771/1541-5015.1051
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Burrows, H. S. (2006). Goals and strategies of a problem-based learning facilitator. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 21–39. DOI:10.7771/1541-5015.1004
Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Caine, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Laferrière, T., Breuleux, A., Allaire, S., Hamel, C., Law, N., Montané, M., Hernandez, O., Turcotte, S., & Scardamalia, M. (in press). The Knowledge Building International Project (KBIP): Scaling up Professional Development for Effective Uses of Collaborative Technologies. In C.-K. Looi & L. W. Teh (Eds.), Scaling Educational Innovations. New York: Springer.
Little, J. W., Lampert, M., Graziani, F., Borko, H., Clark, K. K., & Wong, N. (2007, April). Conceptualizing and investigating the practice of facilitation in content-oriented teacher professional development. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Lunn, S., & Solomon, J. (2000). Primary teachers' thinking about the English national curriculum for science: Autobiographies, warrants, and autonomy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1043–1056. DOI: 10.1002/1098-2736(200012)37:10<1043::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-S
Mason, J. (1996). Qualitative researching. London: Sage Ltd.
Mayer, D. (1999) Building teaching identities: Implications for pre-service teacher education. Paper presented to the Australian Association for Research in Education, Melbourne.
McCann, T., & Clark, E. (2003). Grounded theory in nursing research: Part 1 – Methodology. Nurse Researcher, 11(2), 7–18.
McGhee, G., Marland, G. R., & Atkinson, J. (2007). Grounded theory research: Literature reviewing and reflexivity. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60(3), 334–342. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04436.x
McMenamin, I. (2006). Process and text: Teaching students to review the literature. PS: Political Science and Politics, 39(1), 133–135.
Mills, H. (2014). Learning for real. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core Ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Olsen, B. (2008). Introducing teacher identity and this volume. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(3), 3–6.
Palmer, P. J. (1997). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher’s life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Parkison, P. (2008). Space for performing teacher identity: Through the lens of Kafka and Hegel. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 14(1), 51–60. DOI:10.1080/13540600701837640
Rodgers, C. R., & Scott, K. H. (2008). Development of the personal self and professional identity in learning to teach. In M. Cochran-Smith & S. Feiman-Nemser (Eds.), Handbook of Research in Teacher Education (pp. 732–755). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence. Earlbaum.
Schwandt, T. (1997). Qualitative inquiry: A dictionary of terms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14–22. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X034004014
Sawyer, R. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative improvisation. Educational Leadership, 33, 12–20. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X033002012
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–115). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Smagorinsky, P., Cook, L. S., Moore, C., Jackson, A.Y., & Fry, P. G. (2004). Tensions in learning to teach: accommodations and the development of a teaching identity. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(1), 8–24. DOI: 10.1177/0022487103260067
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Tabak, I., & Baumgartner, E. (2004). The teacher as partner: Exploring participant structures, symmetry, and identity work in scaffolding. Cognition and Instruction, 22(4), 393–429.
Urquhart, C. (2007). The evolving nature of grounded theory method: The case of the information systems discipline. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 339–360). London: Sage.
Varelas, M., House, R., & Wenzel, S. (2005). Beginning teachers immersed into science: Scientist and science teacher identities. Science Education, 89(3), 492–516. DOI: 10.1002/sce.20047
Volkmann, M. J., & Anderson, M. A. (1998). Creating professional identity: Dilemmas and metaphors of a first-year chemistry teacher. Science Education, 82(3), 293–310.
Voogt, J., Laferrie`re, T., Breuleux, A., Itow, R. C., Hickey, D. T., & McKenney, S. (2015). Collaborative design as a form of professional development. Instructional Science, 43, 259–282. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199806)82:3<293::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-7
Zhang, J., Hong, H.-Y., Scardamalia, M., Teo, C. L., & Morley, E. A. (2011). Sustaining knowledge building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary school. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 262–307. DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2011.528317
Zhang, J., & Messina, R. (2010). Collaborative productivity as self-sustaining processes in a Grade 4 knowledge building community. In K. Gomez, J. Radinsky, & L. Lyons (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 49-56). Chicago, IL: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 7–44. DOI:10.1080/10508400802581676 Zhang, J, & Sun, Y. (2011). Reading for idea advancement in a grade 4 knowledge building community. Instructional Science, 39(4), 429–452. DOI: 10.1007/s11251-010-9135-4