User Experience and Digital Government: Exploring a Practice-Based Participatory Approach to Identify Research Opportunities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31468/dwr.979Keywords:
User experience design, practice-led research, design education, digital transformation, human-centered designAbstract
In this case study, the research team (RT) explores user experience design in relation to digital practices adopted by governments. The goal of this first phase was to identify research opportunities. To do so, the RT adopted a practice-centered participatory research approach (Holkup, 2004). The RT began a partnership with a municipal government (City of Edmonton). Regular meetings were held with the partner organization to discuss—among other things—the organization’s structure, current and future projects, the digital editorial strategies implemented by the organization, and the organization's issues and constraints when designing digital services. This allowed the teams to identify not only interesting research questions but also potential teaching collaborations related to work-integrated learning. In this paper, the practice-based participatory research approach is explained, the timeline and the outcome of the partnership are presented, and the lessons learned through that process are shared.
References
Brown, D. (2010). Communicating design: Developing web site documentation for design and planning (2nd ed.). New Riders Press.
Broudoux, É., Chartron, G., & Chaudiron, S. (2013). L’architecture de l’information: Quelle réalité conceptuelle? Études de communication. langages, information, médiations, 41, 13–30. https://doi.org/10.4000/edc.5379
Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5-21.
Cieślar, A. (2020, January 14). User experience design in digital transformation. Medium. https://uxplanet.org/user-experience-design-in-digital-transformation-cc1923bcd2a
Candy, Linda. 2006. Practice-based research: A guide. CCS Report 2006–V1.0 November. Sydney: Creativity and Cognition Studios, University of Technology.
Farber, L. (2009). On making: Integrating approaches to practice-led research in art and design. Introduction notes. FADA Visual Identities in Art and Design Research Centre. University of Johannesburg.
Hinton, A. (2014). What we make when we make information architecture. Dans A. Resmini (Éd.), Reframing information architecture (p. 103 ‑ 117). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06492-5
Hobbs, J., Fenn, T., & Resmini, A. (2010). Maturing a practice. Journal of Information Architecture, 2(1), 37–54.
Holkup, P. A., Tripp-Reimer, T., Salois, E. M., & Weinert, C. (2004). Community-based participatory research. ANS. Advances in Nursing Science, 27(3), 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-200407000-00002
Julkunen, I. (2011). Knowledge-production processes in practice research–outcomes and critical elements. Social Work & Society, 9(1), 60–75.
Kalbach, J. (2016). Mapping experiences. O'Reilly Media Inc.
Lameman, B. A., El-Nasr, M. S., Drachen, A., Foster, W., Moura, D., & Aghabeigi, B. (2010). User studies: A strategy towards a successful industry-academic relationship. Proceedings of the International Academic Conference on the Future of Game Design and Technology, 134–142. https://doi.org/10.1145/1920778.1920798
Luther, L., Tiberius, V., & Brem, A. (2020). User experience (UX) in business, management, and psychology: A bibliometric mapping of the current state of research. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 4(2), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti4020018
Marcoux, Y., & Rizkallah, É. (2013). La dimension sémantique, négligée de l’approche expérience-utilisateur. Études de communication. langages, information, médiations, 41, 119–138. https://doi.org/10.4000/edc.5418
Meyer, J. (2000). Using qualitative methods in health related action research. BMJ, 320(7228), 178–181. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7228.178
Muratovski, G. (2015). Research for designers. Sage Publications.
Norman, D. & Nielsen, J. (2016). The definition of user experience (UX). Nielsen and Norman Group. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/definition-user-experience/
Nadkarni, S., & Prügl, R. (2021). Digital transformation: A review, synthesis and opportunities for future research. Management Review Quarterly, 71(2), 233–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00185-7
Nielsen, J. (2016). The distribution of users’ computer skills: Worse than you think. Nielsen Norman Group. https://www.nngroup.comu/articles/computer-skill-levels/
OECD. (2019). Enhancing innovation capacity in city government. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/f10c96e5-en
Panchev, A. (2020). The role of user experience design within digital transformation: Insights from Sweden [Master’s thesis, Jönköping University].
Paay, J., Kuys, B., & Taffe, S. (2021). Innovating product design through university-industry collaboration: Codesigning a bushfire rated skylight. Design Studies, 76, 101031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101031
Pittaway, J. J., & Montazemi, A. R. (2020). Know-how to lead digital transformation: The case of local governments. Government Information Quarterly, 37(4), 101474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101474
Resmini, A., & Instone, K. (2010). Research and practice in IA. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 36(6), 19-24. https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.2010.1720360607
Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
Sperano, I. (2017). L’audit de contenu en architecture d’information : Examen de la méthode à travers les écrits d’experts [PhD Thesis, Université Laval]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11794/27621
Thompson, E. R. (2007). Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(2), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022106297301
Uggerhøj, L. (2011). What is practice research in social work—definitions, barriers and possibilities. Social Work & Society, 9(1), 15.
Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Qi Dong, J., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Isabelle Sperano
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
If this article is selected for publication in Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, the work shall be published electronically under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA 4.0). This license allows users to adapt and build upon the published work, but requires them to attribute the original publication and license their derivative works under the same terms. There is no fee required for submission or publication. Authors retain unrestricted copyright and all publishing rights, and are permitted to deposit all versions of their paper in an institutional or subject repository.
