Spacious Grammar: Agency and Intention in the Teaching of Research Writing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31468/dwr.931Keywords:
academic writing, functional grammar, positionality, citation, pragmaticsAbstract
Standardized academic English is now understood to be rooted in histories and practices that are colonial, classist, nationalist, heteronormative, ableist, and sexist. Current teaching of academic English carries an ethos of making practices of research writing accessible to students from marginalized backgrounds through explicit attention to language patterns and genre structures. In the context of both ideological critique and explicit pedagogy, I discuss three pragmatic elements of research writing—positionality, citation, and evaluation—with examples from one of my courses. I present these elements and my approach to teaching them as a practice that is attentive to both details of published scholarship and students’ agency and intentionality in shaping their own writing projects, claims, and arguments. My work is framed by a functional approach to grammar where grammar is not interesting as a standardized apparatus but as a code that provides a range of options for producing performative effects. I call this spacious grammar.
References
Ädel, A. (2022). Writer and reader visibility in humanities research articles: Variation across language, regional variety and discipline. English for Specific Purposes, 65, 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.09.001
Alexander, K. P. (2015). From story to analysis: Reflection and uptake in the literacy narrative assignment. Composition Studies, 43(2), 43–71.
Ariel, M. (2008). Pragmatics and grammar. Cambridge University Press.
Artemeva, N. (2005). A time to speak, a time to act: A rhetorical genre analysis of a novice engineer’s calculated risk taking. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 19(4), 389–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651905278309
Baker-Bell, A. (2020). Linguistic justice: Black language, literacy, identity, and pedagogy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315147383
Banks, W. P., Cox, M. B., & Dadas, C. (Eds.). (2019). Re/orienting writing studies: Queer methods, queer projects. Utah State University Press.
Bawarshi, A. S., & Reiff, M. J. (2010). Genre: An introduction to history, theory, research, and pedagogy. Parlor Press; WAC Clearinghouse.
Berry, R. (2005). Making the most of metalanguage. Language Awareness, 14(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410508668817
Condon, F., & Young, V. A. (Eds.). (2016). Performing antiracist pedagogy in rhetoric, writing, and communication. The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.37514/ATD-B.2016.0933
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (1993). Introduction: How a genre approach to literacy can transform the way writing is taught. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), The powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing (pp. 1–21). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203149812
Driscoll, D. L., Paszek, J., Gorzelsky, G., Hayes, C. L., & Jones, E. (2020). Genre knowledge and writing development: Results from the writing transfer project. Written Communication, 37(1), 69–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088319882313
Finn, R. L., & Wright, D. (2012). Unmanned aircraft systems: Surveillance, ethics and privacy in civil applications. Computer Law & Security Review, 28(2), 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2012.01.005
Freadman, A. (2002). Uptake. In R. M. Coe, L. Lingard, & T. Teslenko (Eds.), The rhetoric and ideology of genre: Strategies for stability and change (pp. 39–53). Hampton Press.
Freadman, A. (2020). A tardy uptake. Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, 30, 105–132. https://doi.org/10.31468/cjsdwr.781
Giltrow, J. (2010). Genre and difference: The sociality of linguistic variation. In H. Dorgeloh & A. Warner (Eds.), Syntactic variation and genre (pp. 29–51). De Gruyter Mouton.
Giltrow, J., Gooding, R., & Burgoyne, D. (2021). Academic writing: An introduction (4th edition). Broadview Press.
Harwood, N. (2008). Citers’ use of citees’ names: Findings from a qualitative interview-based study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(6), 1007–1011. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20789
Harwood, N., & Petrić, B. (2012). Performance in the citing behavior of two student writers. Written Communication, 29(1), 55–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088311424133
Holt, M. (2004). Memories of Arabia and empire: An oral history of the British in Aden. Contemporary British History, 18(4), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/13619460412331296928
Hyland, K. (1999). Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 20(3), 341–367. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.3.341
Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00124-8
Inoue, A. B. (2015). Antiracist writing assessment ecologies: Teaching and assessing writing for a socially just future. WAC Clearinghouse. https://wac.colostate.edu/docs/books/inoue/ecologies.pdf
Kennedy, E. L. (1995). Telling tales: Oral history and the construction of pre-Stonewall lesbian history. Radical History Review, 1995(62), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1215/01636545-1995-62-59
Lauer, J. (2012). Surveillance history and the history of new media: An evidential paradigm. New Media & Society, 14(4), 566–582. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811420986
Makmillen, S., & Riedlinger, M. (2020). Markers of identification in Indigenous academic writing: A case study of genre innovation. Text & Talk, 41(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2020-2073
Martinez, A. Y. (2020). Counterstory: The rhetoric and writing of critical race theory. National Council of Teachers of English.
Marwick, A., Fontaine, C., & boyd, danah. (2017). “Nobody sees it, nobody gets mad”: Social media, privacy, and personal responsibility among low-SES youth. Social Media + Society, 3(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117710455
Matruglio, E. (2020). What two teachers took up: Metalanguage, pedagogy and potentials for long-term change. Language and Education, 35(2), 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2020.1825477
Milroy, J., & Milroy, L. (2012). Authority in language: Investigating standard English. Routledge.
Myhill, D. (2005). Prior knowledge and the (RE)production of school written genres. In T. Kostouli (Ed.), Writing in context(s): Textual practices and learning processes in sociocultural settings (pp. 117–136). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24250-3_6
Myhill, D., Jones, S., Watson, A., & Lines, H. (2013). Playful explicitness with grammar: A pedagogy for writing. Literacy, 47(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4369.2012.00674.x
Negretti, R. (2012). Metacognition in student academic writing: A longitudinal study of metacognitive awareness and its relation to task perception, self-regulation, and evaluation of performance. Written Communication, 29(2), 142–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088312438529
Poe, M. (2016). Reframing race in teaching writing across the curriculum. In F. Condon & V. A. Young (Eds.), Performing antiracist pedagogy in rhetoric, writing, and communication (pp. 87–105). The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.37514/ATD-B.2016.0933.2.04
Poe, M. (2022). Learning to unlearn the teaching and assessment of academic writing. Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, 32.
Price, M. (2011). Mad at school: Rhetorics of mental disability and academic life. University of Michigan Press.
Russell, E., Littler, L., & Chick, N. (2020). Surfacing disciplinarity: Citation as a site for integrative learning. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 21(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022220944737
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2013). The role of metalanguage in supporting academic language development. Language Learning, 63(s1), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00742.x
Scott, J. B. (1997). The literacy narrative as production pedagogy in the composition classroom. Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 24(2), 108–117.
Shaughnessy, M. P. (1977). Errors and expectations: A guide for the teacher of basic writing. Oxford University Press.
Skaar, H. (2015). Writing and pseudo-writing from internet-based sources: Implications for learning and assessment. Literacy, 49(2), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12045
Stonington, S. D. (2012). On ethical locations: The good death in Thailand, where ethics sit in places. Social Science & Medicine, 75(5), 836–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.03.045
Thieme, K. (2006). Uptake and genre: The Canadian reception of suffrage militancy. Women’s Studies International Forum, 29(3), 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2006.04.007
Thieme, K. (2016, October 11). What do you teach when you teach writing? Medium. https://katjat.medium.com/what-do-you-teach-when-you-teach-writing-e559e7c6643d
Thieme, K. (2019). Surface and depth: Metalanguage and professional development in Canadian writing studies. Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, 29, 148–159. https://doi.org/10.31468/cjsdwr.757
Thieme, K. (2020, November 9). What even is writing studies? How does it work? Medium. https://katjat.medium.com/what-even-is-writing-studies-how-does-it-work-f33342103891
Thieme, K., & Saunders, M. A. S. (2018). How do you wish to be cited? Citation practices and a scholarly community of care in trans studies research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 32, 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.03.010
Thieme, K., & Walsh Marr, J. (forthcoming). First-year international students and the language of Indigenous studies. College Composition and Communication.
Waite, S. (2017). Teaching queer: Radical possibilities for writing and knowing. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Walsh Marr, J. (2021). The promise and precarity of critical pedagogy in English for academic purposes. BC TEAL Journal, 6(1), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.14288/bctj.v6i1.449
Younging, G. (2018). Elements of Indigenous style: A guide for writing by and about Indigenous peoples. Brush Education.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Katja Thieme
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
If this article is selected for publication in Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, the work shall be published electronically under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA 4.0). This license allows users to adapt and build upon the published work, but requires them to attribute the original publication and license their derivative works under the same terms. There is no fee required for submission or publication. Authors retain unrestricted copyright and all publishing rights, and are permitted to deposit all versions of their paper in an institutional or subject repository.
