User Experience and Digital Government: Exploring a Practice-Based Participatory Approach to Identify Research Opportunities




User experience design, practice-led research, design education, digital transformation, human-centered design


In this case study, the research team (RT) explores user experience design in relation to digital practices adopted by governments. The goal of this first phase was to identify research opportunities. To do so, the RT adopted a practice-centered participatory research approach (Holkup, 2004). The RT began a partnership with a municipal government (City of Edmonton). Regular meetings were held with the partner organization to discuss—among other things—the organization’s structure, current and future projects, the digital editorial strategies implemented by the organization, and the organization's issues and constraints when designing digital services. This allowed the teams to identify not only interesting research questions but also potential teaching collaborations related to work-integrated learning. In this paper, the practice-based participatory research approach is explained, the timeline and the outcome of the partnership are presented, and the lessons learned through that process are shared.


Brown, D. (2010). Communicating design: Developing web site documentation for design and planning (2nd ed.). New Riders Press.

Broudoux, É., Chartron, G., & Chaudiron, S. (2013). L’architecture de l’information: Quelle réalité conceptuelle? Études de communication. langages, information, médiations, 41, 13–30.

Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5-21.

Cieślar, A. (2020, January 14). User experience design in digital transformation. Medium.

Candy, Linda. 2006. Practice-based research: A guide. CCS Report 2006–V1.0 November. Sydney: Creativity and Cognition Studios, University of Technology.

Farber, L. (2009). On making: Integrating approaches to practice-led research in art and design. Introduction notes. FADA Visual Identities in Art and Design Research Centre. University of Johannesburg.

Hinton, A. (2014). What we make when we make information architecture. Dans A. Resmini (Éd.), Reframing information architecture (p. 103 ‑ 117). Springer International Publishing.

Hobbs, J., Fenn, T., & Resmini, A. (2010). Maturing a practice. Journal of Information Architecture, 2(1), 37–54.

Holkup, P. A., Tripp-Reimer, T., Salois, E. M., & Weinert, C. (2004). Community-based participatory research. ANS. Advances in Nursing Science, 27(3), 162–175.

Julkunen, I. (2011). Knowledge-production processes in practice research–outcomes and critical elements. Social Work & Society, 9(1), 60–75.

Kalbach, J. (2016). Mapping experiences. O'Reilly Media Inc.

Lameman, B. A., El-Nasr, M. S., Drachen, A., Foster, W., Moura, D., & Aghabeigi, B. (2010). User studies: A strategy towards a successful industry-academic relationship. Proceedings of the International Academic Conference on the Future of Game Design and Technology, 134–142.

Luther, L., Tiberius, V., & Brem, A. (2020). User experience (UX) in business, management, and psychology: A bibliometric mapping of the current state of research. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 4(2), 18.

Marcoux, Y., & Rizkallah, É. (2013). La dimension sémantique, négligée de l’approche expérience-utilisateur. Études de communication. langages, information, médiations, 41, 119–138.

Meyer, J. (2000). Using qualitative methods in health related action research. BMJ, 320(7228), 178–181.

Muratovski, G. (2015). Research for designers. Sage Publications.

Norman, D. & Nielsen, J. (2016). The definition of user experience (UX). Nielsen and Norman Group.

Nadkarni, S., & Prügl, R. (2021). Digital transformation: A review, synthesis and opportunities for future research. Management Review Quarterly, 71(2), 233–341.

Nielsen, J. (2016). The distribution of users’ computer skills: Worse than you think. Nielsen Norman Group. https://www.nngroup.comu/articles/computer-skill-levels/

OECD. (2019). Enhancing innovation capacity in city government. OECD.

Panchev, A. (2020). The role of user experience design within digital transformation: Insights from Sweden [Master’s thesis, Jönköping University].

Paay, J., Kuys, B., & Taffe, S. (2021). Innovating product design through university-industry collaboration: Codesigning a bushfire rated skylight. Design Studies, 76, 101031.

Pittaway, J. J., & Montazemi, A. R. (2020). Know-how to lead digital transformation: The case of local governments. Government Information Quarterly, 37(4), 101474.

Resmini, A., & Instone, K. (2010). Research and practice in IA. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 36(6), 19-24.

Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–69.

Sperano, I. (2017). L’audit de contenu en architecture d’information : Examen de la méthode à travers les écrits d’experts [PhD Thesis, Université Laval].

Thompson, E. R. (2007). Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(2), 227–242.

Uggerhøj, L. (2011). What is practice research in social work—definitions, barriers and possibilities. Social Work & Society, 9(1), 15.

Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Qi Dong, J., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901.




How to Cite

Sperano, I., Andruchow, R., Petryshyn, L., & Chu, V. (2022). User Experience and Digital Government: Exploring a Practice-Based Participatory Approach to Identify Research Opportunities . Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, 32, 429–445.



Communication État-citoyens