Location Matters: Using Online Writing Tutorials to Enhance Knowledge Production





Writing Centres, asynchronous online learning, writing pedagogy, online writing tutorials


Students enrolled in asynchronous online courses explore much of the subject matter through computer-mediated discussion. In this context, students must often negotiate complex factors such as the course content, the assignment goals, their audience, disciplinary expectations, and the writing process. Writing Centres offer students support services to help them succeed in these text-heavy courses. Typically, students come to Writing Centres in person for help with their critical reading and writing assignments; however, increasingly, tutors are asked to participate in online settings to assist student learning.  A question associated with online tutoring practices is whether students improve their writing skills when they are given the opportunity to get feedback from a tutor and from peers. How can a cooperative, collaborative pedagogical approach to computer-mediated tutoring support students and improve teaching? This paper examines a pedagogical exploration where one tutor interacted asynchronously with students by posting weekly writing activities. Students were asked to respond individually and collaboratively to each activity. I argue that when a tutor in an online course provides feedback, the collaboration creates a new online ecology of reflection and collaboration that may benefit students in their growth as writers. This exploration can be a useful writing pedagogy that can assist instructors by making stronger connections between students’ writing knowledge and writing practices.

Author Biography

Ilka Luyt, Royal Military College of Canada

Dr. Ilka Luyt is an adjunct instructor at Queen's University, Arts and Sciences Online, and a tutor at the Writing Centre at the Royal Military College of Canada, both in Kingston, Ontario.  Her scholarship includes articles related to writing, technology, and society. 


Aldohon, H. (2021). Writing centre conferences: Tutors’ perceptions and practices. Educational Studies, 47 (5), 554–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1717931.

Barthomolomae, D. (1986). Inventing the university. Journal of Basic Writing, 5(1), p. 4-23.

Bizzell, P. (1994). "Contact Zones" and English studies. College English, 163-169. https://doi: 10.2307/378727

Blackburn, J. B. (2010). Critical digital literacies: Following feminist composition theories into twenty-first century contact zones. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.

Cole, A., Lennon, L., & Weber, N. (2021). Student perceptions of online active learning practices and online learning climate predict online course engagement. Interactive Learning Environments 29(5), p. 866-880. https://doi-org.proxy.queensu.ca/10.1080/10494820.2019.1619593

Conference on College Composition and Communication (CCCC) Committee for Best Practices in Online Writing Instruction. (2013). A position statement of principles and example effective practices for online writing instruction (OWI). https://cdn.ncte.org/nctefiles/groups/cccc/owiprinciples.pdf

Cooper, M. M. (1986). The ecology of writing. College English, 48(4), 364-375.

Cooper, M. M. (2011). Rhetorical agency as emergent and enacted. College Composition and Communication, 62(3), 420-449.

Deans, T. (2014). The rhetoric of Jesus writing in the story of the woman accused of adultery (John 7.53-8.11). College Composition and Communication, 65(3), 406-429.

Denton, K. (2017). Beyond the lore: A case for asynchronous online tutoring research. The writing center journal 36 (2), 175–203.

Dolmage, J. (2009). Metis, mêtis, mestiza, medusa: Rhetorical bodies across rhetorical traditions. Rhetoric Review, 28(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350190802540690.

Flower, L. (1994). The construction of negotiated meaning: A social cognitive theory of writing. Carbondale.

Gillam, K., & Wooden, S. R. (2013). Re-embodying online composition: Ecologies of writing in unreal time and space. Computers and Composition, 30(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2012.11.001

Goggins, S & Xing, W. (2016). Building models explaining student participation behavior in asynchronous online discussion. Computers & Education, 94, 241-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.002.

Government of Ontario. (2020). Education Quality and Accountability Office (EQAO). Standard-Setting Process. https://www.eqao.com/the-assessments/osslt/standard-setting-process.

Grabe, W. & Kaplan, R. B. (2014). Theory and practice of writing: An applied linguistic perspective. Routledge.

Kapler, R. (2004). Writing with, through, and beyond the text: An ecology of language. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Keengwe, J., Onchwari, G., & Agamba, J. (2013). Promoting effective e-learning practices through the constructivist pedagogy. Education and Information Technologies, 19(4), 887–898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9260-1.

Kehrwald, B. (2008). Understanding social presence in text-based online learning environments. Distance Education, 29(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910802004860.

Lankshear, C. & Knobel, M. (2011). New literacies: Everyday practices and social learning. McGraw Hill.

Lim, J. R., Rosenthal, S., Sim, Y. J., Lim, Z., & Oh, K. (2021). Making online learning more satisfying: the effects of online-learning self-efficacy, social presence and content structure. Technology, Pedagogy, and Education, 30 (4), p. 543-556. https://doi-org.proxy.queensu.ca/10.1080/1475939X.2021.1934102

Lopez, C. A. (2018). Writing center pedagogy rooted in care ethics, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.

McIntyre, K. & Hall, A. (2017). Mapping the landscape of asynchronous and synchronous online services in communication centers. Communication Center Journal, 3(1), 92-103.

Moussu, L. (2013). Let’s talk! ESL students’ needs and writing centre philosophy. TESL Canadian Journal, 30(2), 55-68.

Nistor, Nicolae & Neubauer, K. (2010). From participation to dropout: Quantitative participation patterns in online university courses. Computers & Education, 55(2), 663- 672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.026.

Romano, F. (2019). Grammatical accuracy in EAP writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 41, 100773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100773.

Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (2014). Smart technology for self-organizing processes. Smart Learning Environments, 1(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-014-0001-8

Stenberg, S. (2013). Composition studies through a feminist lens. Parlor Press.

Swales, J. (2011). The concept of discourse community. In Wardle, E.A. & Downs, D.P. (Eds.), Writing about writing (466-473). Bedford St. Martin’s.

Sword, H. (2012). Stylish academic writing. Harvard University Press.

Thieme, K. A. (2017). Principled uncertainty: Writing studies methods in contexts of indigeneity. College composition and communication, 68 (3), 466–493.

Veletsianos, G. (2016). Emergence and innovation in digital learning: Foundations and applications. AU Press.

Vygotsky, L. (1986). In A. Kozulin (Ed. & Trans.), Thought and language. (Rev. ed.). Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.




How to Cite

Luyt, I. (2022). Location Matters: Using Online Writing Tutorials to Enhance Knowledge Production. Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, 32, 405–417. https://doi.org/10.31468/dwr.965



Special: Selected Papers from CWCA 2021