Student Inclusion through Theoretical Reframing





distributed knowledge, professional communication, writing program administration, communities of practice


In the wake of COVID-19, educators are reconsidering not only conventional methods but also those comparatively recent to pedagogy. However, a change in pedagogical strategy can risk being little more than reactive if its philosophical grounding is unvetted. This piece reconsiders the distributed knowledge framework and its potential for writing program administration and writing instruction. The professional communication discipline has used this framework with a frequent result:  privileging expertise at the exclusion of other knowledges. This piece chronicles a writing program administrator’s pre-pandemic use of distributed knowledge, and how pandemic surprises led to a revision of the lens. The post-pandemic frame differently addresses the knowledges at play in a learning community. It works to include more students by including more of each student.


Adler-Kassner, L. & Wardle, E. (2015). Naming what we know: Threshold concepts of writing studies. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.

Ågotnes, T., & Wáng, Y. N. (2016). Resolving distributed knowledge. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.07515

Ballard, D., Allen, B., Ashcraft, K., Ganesh, S., McLeod, P. & Zoller, H. (2020). When words do not matter: Identifying actions to effect diversity, equity, and inclusion in the academy. Management Communication Quarterly, 34(4), 590-616.

Barradell, S. (2013). The identification of threshold concepts: a review of theoretical complexities and methodological challenges. Higher Education, 65(2), 265-76.

Beckett, J. M. (2017). Negotiating expertise: The strategies writing program administrators use to mediate disciplinary and institutional values. PhD dissertation. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

Blake, A. (2022, April 1). Kids’ mental health is getting worse. But that predated the pandemic. The Washington Post.

Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 17(1), 1-30.

Bourelle, T. (2014). Adapting service-learning into the online technical communication classroom: A framework and model. Technical Communication Quarterly, 23, 247-64.

Calvente, L. B. Y., Calafell, B. & Chavez, K. R. (2020). Here is something you can't understand: The suffocating whiteness of communication studies. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 17(2), 1-8.

Canfield, K. N., Menezes, S., Matsuda, S. B., Moore, A., Mosley Austin, A. N., Dewsbury, B. M., Taylor, C., et al. (2020). Science communication demands a critical approach that centers inclusion, equity, and intersectionality. Frontiers in Communication, 2.

Choo, J., Tan, Y. K., Ong, F., Tiong, S. S. Nair, S., Ong, J. & Chan, A. (2019). What works in service-learning? Achieving civic outcomes, academic connection, career, preparation, and personal growth in students at Ngee Ann Polytechnic. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 25(2), 95-132.

Cox, A. M. (2005). What are communities of practice? A comparative review of four seminal works. Journal of Information Science, 31(6), 527-40.

Crowley, S. (1996). Around 1971: Current-traditional rhetoric and process models of composing. Composition in the twenty-first century: Crisis and change, 64-74.

Dayton, D. & Bernhardt, S. A. (2004). Results of a survey of ATTW members, 2003. Technical Communication Quarterly, 13, 13-43.

DiMaggio, P. J. & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 147-60.

Donehower, K., Hogg, C., & Schell, E. E. (2007). Rural literacies. Carbondale: SIU Press.

Downs, D. & Robertson, L. (2015). Threshold concepts in first-year composition. In L. Adler-Kassner & E. Wardle (Eds.), Naming what we know: Threshold concepts of writing studies (pp. 105-21). Boulder: University Press of Colorado.

Elzainy, A. El Sadik, A. & Al Abdulmonem, W. (2020). Experience of e-learning and online assessment during the COVID-19 pandemic at the college of medicine, Qassim University. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 15(6), 456-62.

Entwhistle, N. (2003). Concepts and conceptual frameworks underpinning the ETL project. ETL Project Occasional Report 3. Edinburgh.

Ermeling, B. A. & Yarbo, J. (2016). Expanding instructional horizons: A case study of teacher team-outside expert partnerships. Teachers College Record, 118(2), 1-48.

Evmenova, A. S., Borup, J. & Dabbagh, N. (2022). Re-designing professional development to assist instructors’ rapid transition to remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. Teacher Educators’ Journal, 14, 22-42.

Farace, R. V., Monge, P. R. & Russell, H. H. (1977). Communicating and organizing. Boston: Addison-Wesley.

Fleming, S. (2019). The effect of out-of-classroom experiences on critical thinking disposition among college students. Doctoral dissertation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University.

Freire, P. (1968). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.

Gelso, C. J. (2006). Applying theories to research. In F. T. L. Leong & J. T. Austin (Eds.), The psychology research handbook: A guide for graduate students and research assistants (pp. 455-64). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Getto, G., Leon, K. & Getto-Rivait, J. (2014). Helping to build better networks: service-learning partnerships as distributed knowledge work. Reflections: Public Rhetoric, Civic Writing and Service Learning, 13(2).

Goebel, J. & Maistry, S. (2019). Recounting the role of emotions in learning economics: Using the Threshold Concepts Framework to explore affective dimensions of students’ learning. International Review of Economics Education, 30, 100145.

Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A. & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 17(4), 397-431.

Hildreth, P. & Kimble, C. (Eds.). (2004). Knowledge networks: Innovation through communities of practice. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

Hint, H. & Leijen, D. (2022). How to determine Estonian writing structures at the macro-, meso-, and micro-level. WAC Clearinghouse.

Hornsby, D. J. (2020). Moving large classes online: Principles for teaching, learning and assessment. 6th International Conference on Higher Education Advances. Universitat Politècnica de València.

Johnson, K. (2019). The threshold concepts of Writing Studies in the writing methods course. Teaching/Writing: The Journal of Writing Teacher Education, 6(1.2).

Lamberti, A. (2019). Navigating a tangled intersection: Agricultural communication as public meeting space among the humanities, social sciences, and the digital. In A. P. Lamberti (Ed.), Cultivating Spheres: Agriculture, Technical Communication, and the Publics. Open Library of Humanities.

Land, R. (2011). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge [video].

Lanius, C. & Hubbell, G. S. (2017). The new data: Argumentation amid, on, with, and in data. In A. Hess & A. Davisson (Eds.), Theorizing Digital Rhetoric (pp. 126-139). Routledge.

Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.

Liu, C. & Wang, W. (2021). Knowledge creation in pandemic time: Challenges and opportunities. Issues in Information Systems, 22(1), 306-319.

Maher, S. & Zollman, Z. (2021). “Into the unknown”: Supervising teacher candidates during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 10, 158-163.

McMurtrie, B. (2022, April 5). A “stunning” level of student disconnection. Chronicle of Higher Education.

Mervosh, S. (2021, July 28). The pandemic hurt these students the most. The New York Times.

Meyer, J. & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning—ten years on (pp. 412-424). Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.

Miller, C. A. & Wyborn, C. (2020). Co-production in global sustainability: Histories and theories. Environmental Science & Policy, 113, 88-95.

Nordstrom, G. (2021). A writing center practitioner’s inquiry into collaboration: Pedagogy, practice, and research. Oxfordshire: Routledge.

Pierangeli, L. T. & Lenhart, C. M. (2018). Service-learning: Promoting empathy through the point-in-time count of homeless populations. Journal of Nursing Education, 57(7).

Poe, M. (2022, in press). Learning to unlearn the teaching and assessment of academic writing. Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, 32.

Ofgang, E. (2021, June 1). 5 learning gains made during the pandemic. Tech & Learning.

Ottman, R. D. (2021). Theorizing eloquence as a means-driven process of recursive invention. Doctoral dissertation. Bloomington: Indiana University.

Roberts, P. (2019). Looking for the rural: Epistemic absences and cultural silence. In A. Reid & D. Price (Eds.), The Australian Curriculum: Promises, Problems and Possibilities (pp. 201-210). Deakin West: Australian Curriculum Studies Association.

Rose, K. & Grauman, J. (2020). Motivational scaffolding’s potential for inviting transfer in writing center collaborations. In B. Devet & D. L. Driscoll (Eds.), Transfer of Learning in the Writing Center.

Rosenberg, B. (2021, March 24). It’s time to rethink higher education. The Chronicle of Higher Education.

Schriver, K. (2012). What we know about expertise in professional communication. In V. W. Berninger (Ed.), Past, Present, and Future Contributions of Cognitive Writing Research to Cognitive Psychology (pp. 275-312). New York: Psychology Press.

Sorensen, N. (2022). Developing the improvising teacher: Implications for professionalism and the development of expertise. In H. King (Ed.), Developing Expertise for Teaching in Higher Education (pp. 218-30). Routledge.

Strait, J. & Sauer, T. (2004). Constructing experiential learning for online courses: The birth of e-service. Educause Quarterly, 1, 62-5.

Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. M. & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Swarts, J. (2018). Locating and describing the work of technical communication in an online user network. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 61(4), 356-71.

Turnley, M. (2007). Integrating critical approaches to technology and service-learning projects. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16(1), 103-23.

Van der Spoel, I., Noroozi, O., Schuurink, E. & van Ginkel, S. (2020). Teachers’ online teaching expectations and experiences during the Covid-19 pandemic in the Netherlands. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 623-38.

Wang, X., Hegde, S., Son, C., Keller, B., Smith, A., & Sasangohar, F. (2020). Investigating mental health of US college students during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional survey study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(9), e22817.

Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.

Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Brighton: Harvard Business Review Press.

Winsor, D. (2001). Learning to do knowledge work in systems of distributed cognition. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15(1), 5-28.

Zwanch, K. & Cribbs, J. A. (2021). Study of motivation and engagement in teacher education: Students’ perceptions of moving to online instruction in response to a pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 29(1), 91-119.




How to Cite

Adrienne Lamberti. (2022). Student Inclusion through Theoretical Reframing: English. Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, 32, 212–236.



Special: Rethinking the Structures of Academic Writing