Intersections between Tutorial Engagement, Directive Feedback, and Critical Reflection

Authors

  • Gail Nash Oklahoma Christian University
  • Morgan Dawson
  • Kaine Gulozer

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31468/cjsdwr.616

Abstract

A handful of research studies have investigated the effect of writing centre tutorials on subsequent revisions. This classroom-based study adds to that research by reporting results from a collaborative study between a composition professor and a writing centre tutor. The aim of the study was to examine the influence of writing centre tutorials on immediate student revisions as well as final drafts. The analysis was extensively framed by the Vygotskyan sociocultural model of language and cognitive development with an emphasis on tutor-student engagement as reciprocal interaction which include directive feedback and consequential revision. This study employed a qualitative design with students in a sophomore-level core composition course. Participants attended a writing centre session concerning their major writing assignment. Data triangulation included analysis of assignment drafts, observation notes, and tutorial transcripts. Findings revealed that students attended to feedback that was directive and straightforward. Additionally, students did not attend to citation feedback unless it was direct and explicit. Furthermore, students sometimes overgeneralized and misapplied the feedback. The findings highlight the impact of individual learner factors as well as the results of directive feedback on revisions.

Downloads

Published

2018-05-24

How to Cite

Nash, G., Dawson, M., & Gulozer, K. (2018). Intersections between Tutorial Engagement, Directive Feedback, and Critical Reflection. Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, 28, 246–264. https://doi.org/10.31468/cjsdwr.616

Issue

Section

Special: Selected Papers from CWCA 2017