Plagiarism Education in Science: The Effect of Instruction on Student Attitudes

Kristen Welsh-Unwala

Abstract


In scientific publications, plagiarism is an ethical breach that can lead to article retractions and damage the reputations of scientists. In academia, when students begin their scientific careers and are learning the norms of scientific research, teaching the concepts of plagiarism is critical. However, a lack of clarity exists regarding the nuances of plagiarism and how universities should address instances of plagiarism committed by students. This study was conducted at the University of The Bahamas with students of scientific research methods classes to assess the effectiveness of plagiarism instruction on student attitudes. Over five semesters, a total of 110 students attended a lesson on plagiarism and completed at-home assignments to support the information learned in class. Students were provided questionnaires, which were administered before and after the plagiarism class, to assess their understanding, attitudes, and opinions regarding plagiarism at the University. Following the class, students indicated a greater understanding of plagiarism, more agreement with strict punishments for plagiarism, and less agreement on the acceptability of reusing past assignments. Students also reported a lack of clarity of the University policy on plagiarism. These results suggest that the university would benefit from providing additional learning opportunities pertaining to plagiarism, as well as a revision of the plagiarism policy, which could assist students as they embark on their scientific careers.

Keywords


plagiarism; academic misconduct; science; classroom instruction; student attitudes; ethical aspects of information use

Full Text:

PDF FULL TEXT

References


Ana, J., Koehlmoos, T., Smith, R. & Yan, L.L. (2013). Research misconduct in low-and middle-income countries. PLOS Medicine 10(3), e1001315. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001315

Anderson, M., Seashore Louis, K. & Earle, J. (2004). Disciplinary and departmental effects on observations of faculty and graduate student misconduct. The Journal of Higher Education 65(3), 331-349. http://doi.org/10.2307/2943971

Anderson, M. & Seneck, N. (2011). The problem of plagiarism. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations 29(1), 90-94. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.09.013

Antes, A. L., Murphy, S. T., Waples, E. P., Mumford, M. D., Brown, R. P. Connelly, S., & Devenport, L. D. (2009) A meta-analysis of ethics instruction effectiveness in the sciences. Ethics and Behavior 19(5), 379-402. http://doi.org/10.1080/10508420903035380

Bennett, K., Behrendt, L., & Boothby, J. (2011). Instructor perceptions of plagiarism: Are we finding common ground? Teaching of Philosophy 38(1), 29-35. http://doi.org/10.1177/0098628310390851

Biagoli, M. (2012). Recycling texts or stealing time?: Plagiarism, authorship, and credit in science. International Journal of Cultural Property 19(3), 453-470. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739112000276

Bouville, M. (2008). Plagiarism: Words and ideas. Science and Engineering Ethics 14(3), 311-312. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-008-9057-6

Elder, C., Pflugfelder, E. & Angeli, E. (no date) Plagiarism attitude scale. Online Writing Lab at Purdue University. Retrieved from https://owl.purdue.edu/.

Fanelli, D., Ioannidis, J. & Goodman, S. (2018). Improving the integrity of published science: An expanded taxonomy of retractions and corrections. European Journal of Clinical Investigation 48(4), 1-6. http://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12898

Fanelli, D. (2009). How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS ONE 4(5), e5748. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738

Fang, F.C., Steen, R. G., & Casadeall, A. (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(42), 17028-17033. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212247109

Frick, T., C. Dagli, A. Barrett, R. Myers, K. Kwon, & K. Tomita. (2016). How to recognize plagiarism: Tutorial and tests. Bloomington, IN: Department of Instructional Systems Technology, School of Education, Indiana University. Access at: https://www.indiana.edu/~academy/firstPrinciples/index.html

Grieneisen, M.L. & Zhang, M. (2013) A comprehensive survey of retracted articles from the scholarly literature. PLoS ONE 7(10), e44188. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044118

Halupa, C. & Bolliger, D. U. (2013). Faculty perceptions of student self plagiarism: An exploratory multi-university study. Journal of Academic Ethics 11(4), 297-310. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-013-9195-6

Pincus, H. S. & Schmelkin, L. P. (2003). Faculty perceptions of academic dishonesty. The Journal of Higher Education 74(2), 196-209. http://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2003.11777196

Pupovac, V. & Fanelli, D. (2014) Scientists admitting to plagiarism: A meta-analysis of surveys. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(5), 1331-1352. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9600-6

Reich, E. (2010). Combating unethical publications with plagiarism detection services. Nature 468, 745. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.09.016

Swazey, J. P., Anderson, M. S., & Seashore Lewis, K. (1993). Ethical problems in academic research. American Scientist 81(6), 542-553.

Thomas, D. (2004). How educators can more effectively understand and combat the plagiarism epidemic. Brigham Young Education and Law Journal 2004(2), 421-430.

U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy. (2000). Federal Research Misconduct Policy. Federal Register 65(235), 76260-76264. Retrieved from https://ori.hhs.gov/federal-research-misconduct-policy.

Zhang, Y. & Jia, X. (2012). A survey on the use of CrossCheck for detecting plagiarism in journal articles. Learned Publishing 25, 292-307. http://doi.org/10.1087/20120408




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15362/ijbs.v25i0.319

Copyright (c) 2019 Kristen Welsh-Unwala