Plagiarism Education in Science: The Effect of Instruction on Student Attitudes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15362/ijbs.v25i0.319Keywords:
plagiarism, academic misconduct, science, classroom instruction, student attitudes, ethical aspects of information useAbstract
In scientific publications, plagiarism is an ethical breach that can lead to article retractions and damage the reputations of scientists. In academia, when students begin their scientific careers and are learning the norms of scientific research, teaching the concepts of plagiarism is critical. However, a lack of clarity exists regarding the nuances of plagiarism and how universities should address instances of plagiarism committed by students. This study was conducted at the University of The Bahamas with students of scientific research methods classes to assess the effectiveness of plagiarism instruction on student attitudes. Over five semesters, a total of 110 students attended a lesson on plagiarism and completed at-home assignments to support the information learned in class. Students were provided questionnaires, which were administered before and after the plagiarism class, to assess their understanding, attitudes, and opinions regarding plagiarism at the University. Following the class, students indicated a greater understanding of plagiarism, more agreement with strict punishments for plagiarism, and less agreement on the acceptability of reusing past assignments. Students also reported a lack of clarity of the University policy on plagiarism. These results suggest that the university would benefit from providing additional learning opportunities pertaining to plagiarism, as well as a revision of the plagiarism policy, which could assist students as they embark on their scientific careers.References
Ana, J., Koehlmoos, T., Smith, R., & Yan, L. L. (2013). Research misconduct in low-and middle-income countries. PLOS Medicine, 10(3), e1001315. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001315
Anderson, M. S., & Steneck, N. H. (2011). The problem of plagiarism. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, 29(1), 90-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.09.013
Anderson, M. S., Louis, K. S., & Earle, J. (1994). Disciplinary and departmental effects on observations of faculty and graduate student misconduct. The Journal of Higher Education, 65(3), 331-349. https://doi.org/10.2307/2943971
Antes, A. L., Murphy, S. T., Waples, E. P., Mumford, M. D., Brown, R. P., Connelly, S., & Devenport, L. D. (2009) A meta-analysis of ethics instruction effectiveness in the sciences. Ethics & Behavior, 19(5), 379-402. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508420903035380
Baker-Gardner, R., & Smart, C. A. (2017). Ignorance or intent? A case study of plagiarism in higher education among LIS students in the Caribbean. In D. M. Velliaris (Ed.) Handbook of research on academic misconduct in higher education (pp. 182-205). IGI Global. http://uwispace.sta.uwi.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/2139/45520/Ignorance-or-Intent_Baker-Gardner&Smart2017_UWIMona_FacultyPub_Coll.pdf?sequence=1
Bennett, K. K., Behrendt, L. S., & Boothby, J. L. (2011). Instructor perceptions of plagiarism: Are we finding common ground? Teaching of Psychology, 38(1), 29-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628310390851
Biagoli, M. (2012). Recycling texts or stealing time?: Plagiarism, authorship, and credit in science. International Journal of Cultural Property, 19(3), 453-470. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739112000276
Bouville, M. (2008). Plagiarism: Words and ideas. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(3), 311-312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-008-9057-6
Brown, N., & Janssen, R. (2017). Preventing plagiarism and fostering academic integrity: A practical approach. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 5(3), 102-109. https://doi.org/ 10.14297/jpaap.v5i3.245
College of The Bahamas. (1985). Policy on plagiarism. Nassau, Bahamas. https://web.archive.org/web/20120524065235/http://www.cob.edu.bs/POLICIES/Plagiarism.pdf
Elder, C., Pflugfelder, E., & Angeli, E. (2012). Plagiarism attitude scale. https://web.archive.org/web/20130518191211/http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/929/03/
Fanelli, D. (2009). How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS One, 4(5), e5748. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738
Fang, F. C., Steen, R. G., & Casadevall, A. (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(42), 17028-17033. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212247109
Frick, T., Dagli, C., Barrett, A., Myers, R., Kwon, K., & Tomita. K. (2016). How to recognize plagiarism: Tutorial and tests {online tutorial]. Department of Instructional Systems Technology, School of Education, Indiana University. https://www.indiana.edu/~academy/firstPrinciples/index.html
Garner, H. R. (2011). Combating unethical publications with plagiarism detection services. Urologic oncology: Seminars and original investigations, 29(1), 95-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.09.016
Gasparyan, A. Y., Nurmashev, B., Seksenbayev, B., Trukhachev, V. I., Kostyukova, E. I., & Kitas, G. D. (2017). Plagiarism in the context of education and evolving detection strategies. Journal of Korean Medicine, 32(8), 1220-1227. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2017.32.8.1220
Gibson, J. W., Blackwell, C. W., Greenwood, R. A., Mobley, I., & Blackwell, R. W. (2006). Preventing and detecting plagiarism in the written work of college students. Journal of Diversity Management (JDM), 1(2), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.19030/jdm.v1i2.5033
Grieneisen, M. L., & Zhang, M. (2013). A comprehensive survey of retracted articles from the scholarly literature. PLoS One, 7(10), e44188. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044118
Gullifer, J. M., & Tyson, G. A. (2014). Who has read the policy on plagiarism? Unpacking students’ understanding of plagiarism. Studies in Higher Education, 39(7), 1202-1218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.777412
Halupa, C., & Bolliger, D. U. (2013). Faculty perceptions of student self plagiarism: An exploratory multi-university study. Journal of Academic Ethics 11(4), 297-310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-013-9195-6
McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 219-232. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327019EB1103_2
Pincus, H. S., & Schmelkin, L. P. (2003). Faculty perceptions of academic dishonesty. The Journal of Higher Education, 74(2), 196-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2003.11777196
Pupovac, V., & Fanelli, D. (2014). Scientists admitting to plagiarism: A meta-analysis of surveys. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(5), 1331-1352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9600-6
Swazey, J. P., Anderson, M. S., & Lewis, K. S. (1993). Ethical problems in academic research. American Scientist, 81(6), 542-553. https://www.jstor.org/stable/29775057
Thomas, D. (2004). How educators can more effectively understand and combat the plagiarism epidemic. Brigham Young Education and Law Journal, 2004(2), 421-430. https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/elj/vol2004/iss2/10
United States Office of Science and Technology Policy. (2000). Federal research misconduct policy. Federal Register, 65(235), 76260-76264. Retrieved from https://ori.hhs.gov/federal-research-misconduct-policy
Walcott, P. (2016). Attitudes of second year computer science undergraduates toward plagiarism. Caribbean Teaching Scholar, 6, 63-80. https://journals.sta.uwi.edu/ojs/index.php/cts/article/download/1649/1512
Zhang, Y., & Jia, X. (2012). A survey on the use of CrossCheck for detecting plagiarism in journal articles. Learned Publishing, 25, 292-307. https://doi.org/10.1087/20120408
