Analyse de l’agentivité transformatrice dans une activité de robotique pédagogique impliquant la résolution collaborative de problèmes

Authors

  • Raoul Kamga Université du Québec à Montréal
  • Sylvie Barma Université Laval
  • Margarida Romero Université Côte d’Azur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53967/cje-rce.5143

Keywords:

transformative agency, collaborative problem solving, educational robotics, competency-based education, assessment

Abstract

Collaborative problem solving is a very important skill for pre-service teachers. Indeed, they will be called upon to solve problems daily basis and to collaborate with other members of the school team or with their students. However, the collaborative problem-solving skill remains very little documented in the research. To contribute to the understanding of this skill, we will analyze it from a new angle, that of transformative agency, and in a context of educational robotics. We mobilize activity theory as a theoretical framework and analyze a pedagogical robotics activity involving a team of four pre-service primary teachers in collaborative problem solving. The results of our analyses highlight the presence of five of the six types of transformative agency expressions. They also highlight that the collaborative problem solving in this educational robotics activity was strongly marked by conflictual situations at the individual and collective levels.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Raoul Kamga, Université du Québec à Montréal

Raoul Kamga est professeur au département de didactique de l’Université du Québec à Montréal. Il s’intéresse au développement de la compétence numérique du personnel enseignant et des élèves dans le cadre des activités de programmation informatique et de robotique pédagogique. Ses recherches abordent aussi la résolution collaborative de problèmes.

Sylvie Barma, Université Laval

Sylvie Barma est professeur titulaire à la faculté des sciences de l’éducation de l’Université Laval. Ses travaux de recherche sont en lien avec la didactique des sciences et technologie au secondaire et la compétence numérique sous l’angle de la théorie de l’activité. Ainsi, elle pose un regard socioculturel sur la formation du personnel enseignant de sciences au secondaire.

Margarida Romero, Université Côte d’Azur

Margarida Romero est professeure titulaire à l'Université Côte d'Azur (Laboratoire d'Innovation et Numérique pour l'Education, France) et professeure associée à l'Université Laval (Canada). Ses recherches sont orientées vers les usages inclusifs, humanistes et créatifs des technologies (co-design, game design et robotique pédagogique) pour le développement de la créativité, de la résolution de problèmes, de la collaboration et de la pensée computationnelle.

References

Bertrand, M., Durand, E. S. et Gonzalez, T. (2017). « We’re trying to take action » : Transformative agency, role re-mediation, and the complexities of youth participatory action research. Equity & Excellence in Education, 50(2), 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2017.1301837

Cukurova, M., Luckin, R., Millán, E. et Mavrikis, M. (2018). The NISPI framework: Analysing collaborative problem-solving from students’ physical interactions. Computers & Education, 116, 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.007

Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (F. Seeger, trad.) http://lchc.ucsd.edu/mca/Paper/Engestrom/Learning-by-Expanding.pdf

Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. Dans Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen et R. -L. Punamäki-Gitai (dir.), Perspectives on activity theory (p. 19–38). Cambridge University Press.

Engeström, Y. (2011). From design experiments to formative interventions. Theory & Psychology, 21(5), 598–628. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354311419252

Engeström, Y. (2015). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research (2e éd.). Cambridge University Press.

Engeström, Y. (2020). Ascending from the abstract to the concrete as a principle of expansive learning. Psychological Science and Education, 25(5), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2020250503

Engeström, Y., Nuttall, J. et Hopwood, N. (2020). Transformative agency by double stimulation: advances in theory and methodology. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 30(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2020.1805499

Engeström, Y. et Pyörälä, E. (2021). Using activity theory to transform medical work and learning. Medical Teacher, 43(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1795105

Engeström, Y. et Sannino, A. (2013). La volition et l’agentivité transformatrice : perspective théorique de l’activité. Revue internationale du CRIRES : innover dans la tradition de Vygotsky, 1(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.51657/ric.v1i1.41017

Engeström, Y., Rantavuori, J. et Kerosuo, H. (2013). Expansive learning in a library: Actions, cycles and deviations from instructional intentions. Vocations and Learning, 6(1), 81–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-012-9089-6

Engeström, Y., Virkkunen, J., Helle, M., Pihlaja, J. et Poikela, R. (1996). The change laboratory as a tool for transforming work. Lifelong Learning in Europe, 1(2), 10–17.

Haapasaari, A. et Kerosuo, H. (2015). Transformative agency : The challenges of sustainability in a long chain of double stimulation. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 4, 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.07.006

Haapasaari, A., Engeström, Y. et Kerosuo, H. (2016). The emergence of learners’ transformative agency in a Change Laboratory intervention. Journal of Education and Work, 29(2), 232–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2014.900168

Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo-Siegl, K., Ahonen, A., Näykki, P. et Valtonen, T. (2016). Preparing teacher-students for twenty-first-century learning practices (PREP 21): A framework for enhancing collaborative problem-solving and strategic learning skills. Teachers and Teaching, 23(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1203772

Huang, J. (2014). Autonomy, agency and identity in foreign language learning and teaching. Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0558-2

Kamga, R. (2019). Analyse de la compétence de résolution collaborative de problèmes des futur(e)s enseignant(e)s de l’enseignement primaire [Thèse de doctorat, Université Laval]. Corpus. https://corpus.ulaval.ca/entities/publication/d4915564-ce29-4806-affe-8526dbe551b5/full

Klerkx, L., Aarts, N. et Leeuwis, C. (2010). Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: The interactions between innovation networks and their environment. Agricultural Systems, 103(6), 390–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2010.03.012

Nummijoki, J., Engeström, Y. et Sannino, A. (2018). Defensive and expansive cycles of learning: A study of home care encounters. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27(2), 224–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1412970

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2017, juillet). Pisa 2015 collaborative problem-solving framework. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/Draft%20PISA%202015%20Collaborative%20Problem%20Solving%20Framework%20.pdf

Sannino, A. (2015a). The emergence of transformative agency and double stimulation: Activity-based studies in the Vygotskian tradition [Éditorial]. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 4, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.07.001

Sannino, A. (2015b). The principle of double stimulation: A path to volitional action. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 6, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.01.001

Sannino, A., Engeström, Y. et Lemos, M. (2016). Formative interventions for expansive learning and transformative agency. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(4), 599–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1204547

Vänninen, I., Pereira-Querol, M. et Engeström, Y. (2015). Generating transformative agency among horticultural producers: An activity-theoretical approach to transforming integrated pest management. Agricultural Systems, 139, 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.06.003

Virkkunen, J. (2006). Dilemmas in building shared transformative agency. Activités, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.4000/activites.1850

Virkkunen, J. et Newnham, D. S. (2013). The change laboratory: A tool for collaborative development of work and education. SensePublishers.

Voogt, J. et Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938

Rieber, R. W. (1997). The collected works of LS Vygotsky. Volume 4: The history of the development of higher mental functions. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4615-5939-9

Yang, H. (2015). Teacher mediated agency in educational reform in China. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15925-6

Published

2023-03-25

How to Cite

Kamga, R., Barma, S., & Romero, M. (2023). Analyse de l’agentivité transformatrice dans une activité de robotique pédagogique impliquant la résolution collaborative de problèmes. Canadian Journal of Education Revue Canadienne De l’éducation, 46(1), 193–220. https://doi.org/10.53967/cje-rce.5143

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.