The measurement of collaborative culture in secondary schools: An informal subgroup approach

Main Article Content

Chloé Meredith
Nienke M Moolenaar
Charlotte Struyve
Machteld Vandecandelaere
Sarah Gielen
Eva Kyndt

Abstract

Research on teacher collaboration underlines the importance of a collaborative culture for teachers’ functioning. However, while scholars usually regard collaborative culture as a school team characteristic, this study argues that subgroups may be more meaningful units of analysis to conceptualize and assess teachers’ perceptions of collaborative culture. Based on the assumption that collaborative culture is developed, expressed, and maintained in frequent work-related interactions, this study hypothesizes that collaborative culture is not homogenously spread over the school but rather varies between informal subgroups. Data from 760 Flemish teachers were examined using social network analysis and consensus analyses. The results provided evidence that perceptions on collaborative culture are more homogeneous within informal subgroups that are characterized by frequent interactions than the entire school team. This finding stresses the importance of assessing the meaningful unit of analysis for collective-level and socially-constructed concepts, such as collaborative culture. Moreover, the benefits and potential of a social network approach to identify (socially stable) subunits within the school team are illustrated.

Article Details

How to Cite
Meredith, C., Moolenaar, N. M., Struyve, C., Vandecandelaere, M., Gielen, S., & Kyndt, E. (2017). The measurement of collaborative culture in secondary schools: An informal subgroup approach. Frontline Learning Research, 5(2), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v5i2.283
Section
Articles

References

Abbott, A. (1995). Things of Boundaries. Social Research, 62(4), 857–882.
Adkins, B., & Caldwell, D. (2004). Firm or subgroup culture: where does fitting in matter most? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(8), 969-978. doi: 10.1002/job.291
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of management review, 14(1), 20-39. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1989.4278999
Ball, S. J. & Lacy, C. (1984) Subject disciplines as the opportunity for group action: a measure critique of subject subcultures. In A. Hargreaves & P. Woods (Eds.), Classrooms and staffrooms: the sociology of teachers and teaching (pp. 232-244). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
Barczak, G., Lassk, F., & Mulki, J. (2010). Antecedents of team creativity: An examination of team emotional intelligence, team trust and collaborative culture. Creativity and Innovation Management, 4, 332-345. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00574.x
Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K.J. Klein & S.W. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349-381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Borgatti, S. P., Carley, K. M., & Krackhardt, D. (2006). On the robustness of centrality measures under conditions of imperfect data. Social Networks, 28, 124-136. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2005.05.001
Borgatti, S. P., & Everett, M. G. (2000). Models of core/periphery structures. Social networks, 21(4), 375-395. doi: 10.1016/S0378-8733(99)00019-2
Busher, H., & Blease, D. (2000). Growing collegial cultures in subject departments in secondary schools: working with science staff. School Leadership & Management, 20(1), 99-112. doi: 10.1080/13632430068905
Coburn, C. E., & Russell, J. L. (2008). District policy and teachers’ social networks. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30, 203-235. doi: 10.3102/0162373708321829
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of management, 23(3), 239-290. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2063(97)90034-9
Daly, A. J., Moolenaar, N. M., Bolivar, J. M., & Burke, P. (2010). Relationships in reform: The role of teachers' social networks. Journal of Educational Administration, 48, 359-391. doi: 10.1108/09578231011041062
Dumay, X. (2009). Origins and consequences of schools’ organizational culture for student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(4), 523-555. doi: 10.1177/0013161X09335873
Firestone, W. A., & Pennell, J. R. (1993). Teacher commitment, working conditions, and differential incentive policies. Review of educational research, 63(4), 489-525. doi: 10.3102/00346543063004489
Flores, M. A. (2004). The impact of school culture and leadership on new teachers' learning in the workplace. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 7, 297-318. doi: 10.1080/1360312042000226918
Foster-Fishman, P. G., Berkowitz, S. L., Lounsbury, D. W., Jacobson, S., & Allen, N. A. (2001). Building collaborative capacity in community coalitions: A review and integrative framework. American journal of community psychology, 29(2), 241-261. doi: 10.1023/A:1010378613583
Frank, K. A. (1995). Identifying cohesive subgroups. Social Networks, 17, 27-56. doi: 10.1016/0378-8733(94)00247-8
Frank, K. A. (1996). Mapping interactions within and between cohesive subgroups. Social networks, 18, 93-119. doi: 10.1016/0378-8733(95)00257-X
Frank, K. A., Penuel, W. R., & Krause, A. (2015). What Is A “Good” Social Network For Policy Implementation? The Flow Of Know‐How For Organizational Change. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 34(2), 378-402. doi: 10.1002/pam.21817
Frank, K. A., & Yasumoto, J. Y. (1998). Linking action to social structure within a system: Social capital within and between subgroups. American journal of sociology, 104, 642-686. doi: 10.1086/210083
Frank, K. A., & Zhao, Y. (2005). Subgroups as meso-level entities in the social organization of schools. In L.V. Hedges & B. Schneider (Eds.), Social Organization of Schooling. New York, NY: Sage Publications.
González-Romá, V., Peiró, J. M., & Tordera, N. (2002). An examination of the antecedents and moderator influences of climate strength. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 465-473. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.87.3.465
Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers' work and culture in the postmodern age. New York, NY: Teachers’ College Press.
Hargreaves, D. H., & Hargreaves, D. (2006). Social relations in a secondary school. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul. doi: 10.4324/9780203001837
Harris, S. G. (1994). Organizational culture and individual sensemaking: A schema-based perspective. Organization Science, 5(3), 309-321. doi: 10.1287/orsc.5.3.309
Hofstede, G. (1998). Attitudes, values and organizational culture: Disentangling the concepts. Organization studies, 19(3), 477-493. doi: 10.1177/017084069801900305
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85-98. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85
James, L. R., & Jones, A. P. (1974). Organizational climate: A review of theory and research. Psychological bulletin, 81(12), 1096-1112. doi: 10.1037/h0037511
Kossinets, G. (2006). Effects of missing data in social networks. Social Networks, 28, 247-268. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2005.07.002
Krumpal, I. (2013). Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: a literature review. Quality & Quantity, 47(4), 2025-2047. doi: 10.1007/s11135-011-9640-9
Lazega, E., & Snijders, T.A.B. (2016). Multilevel Network analysis for the Social Sciences. Cham, CH: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-24520-1
Leithwood, K., Leonard, L., & Sharratt, L. (1998). Conditions fostering organizational learning in schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34, 243-276. doi: 10.1177/0013161X98034002005
Leonard, L. J. (2002). Schools as Professional Communities: Addressing the Collaborative Challenge. IEJLL: International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 6(17).
Lieberman, A. (1990). Schools as collaborative cultures: Creating the future now. Bristol, UK: The Falmer Press.
Lieberman, A. (1995). Practices that support teacher development: Transforming conceptions of professional learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 591-596.
Little, J. W. (1982). Norms of collegiality and experimentation: Workplace conditions of school success. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 325-340. doi: 10.3102/00028312019003325
Lock, P., & Crawford, J. (1999). The relationship between commitment and organizational culture, subculture, leadership style and job satisfaction in organizational change and development. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 20, 365-373. doi: 10.1108/01437739910302524
Louis, K. S., & Kruse, S. D. (1995). Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Louis, K. S., Marks, H. M., & Kruse, S. (1996). Teachers’ professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 757-798. doi: 10.3102/00028312033004757
Marks, H. M., & Louis, K. S. (1997). Does teacher empowerment affect the classroom? The implications of teacher empowerment for instructional practice and student academic performance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 245-275. doi: 10.3102/01623737019003245
McFarland, D. A. (2001). Student resistance: How the formal and informal organization of classrooms facilitate everyday forms of student defiance. American Journal of Sociology, 107(3), 612-678. doi: 10.1086/338779
McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological methods, 1(1), 30-46. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.4.390
Moolenaar, N. M., Sleegers, P. J., & Daly, A. J. (2012). Teaming up: Linking collaboration networks, collective efficacy, and student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 251-262. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2011.10.001
Nias, J. (2005). Why teachers need their colleagues: A developmental perspective. In D. Hopkins (Ed.), The practice and theory of school improvement (pp. 223-237). Dordrecht, NL: Springer. doi: 10.1007/1-4020-4452-6
Payne, R. L., Fineman, S., & Wall, T. D. (1976). Organizational climate and job satisfaction: A conceptual synthesis. Organizational behavior and human performance, 16(1), 45-62. doi: 10.1016/0030-5073(76)90006-4
Peterson, T. O., & Beard, J. W. (2004). Workspace technology's impact on individual privacy and team interaction. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 10(7/8), 163-172. doi: 10.1108/13527590410569887
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. 1). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Robins, G., & Alexander, M. (2004). Small worlds among interlocking directors: Network structure and distance in bipartite graphs. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 10(1), 69-94. doi: 10.1023/B:CMOT.0000032580.12184.c0
Rubin, D. B., & Little, R. J. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Sackmann, S. A. (1992). Culture and subcultures: An analysis of organizational knowledge. Administrative science quarterly, 37(1), 140-161. doi: 10.2307/2393536
Schein, E. H. (1985). Defining organizational culture. Classics of organization theory, 3, 490-502.
Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (Vol. 2). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
Schneider, B. (1975). Organizational climate: Individual preferences and organizational realities revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(4), 459-465. doi: 10.1037/h0076919
Scott, J. (1991) Social Network Analysis: a Handbook. London, UK: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781446294413
Siskin, L. S. (1991). Departments as different worlds: Subject subcultures in secondary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 27, 134-160. doi: 10.1177/0013161X91027002003
Soeters, J. (1988). Organisatiecultuur: Inhoud, betekenis en veranderbaarheid [Organizational culture: Content, meaning and changeability]. In J.J. Swanink (Ed.), Werken met organisatiecultuur: De harde gevolgen van de zachte factor [Working with organizational culture: The harsh effects of the soft factor] (pp. 15-27). Vlaardingen: Nederlands Studie Centrum.
Strahan, D. (2003). Promoting a collaborative professional culture in three elementary schools that have beaten the odds. The Elementary School Journal, 104(2), 127-146. doi: 10.1086/499746
Sveiby, K. E., & Simons, R. (2002). Collaborative climate and effectiveness of knowledge work-an empirical study. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6, 420-433. doi: 10.1108/13673270210450388
Van Maanen, J., & Schein, E. H. (1979). Towards a theory of organizational socialization. In B. M. Staw (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 1 (pp. 209-264). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Van Maele, D., Moolenaar, N.M., & Daly, A.J. (2015). All for one and one for all: A social network perspective on the effects of social influence on teacher trust. In M. DiPaola & W.K. Hoy (Eds.) (pp. 171-196), Leadership and School Quality. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Visscher, A., & Witziers, B. (2004). Subject departments as professional communities? British Educational Research Journal, 30(6), 785-800. doi: 10.1080/0141192042000279503
Waldron, N. L., & McLeskey, J. (2010). Establishing a collaborative school culture through comprehensive school reform. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 20(1), 58-74. doi: 10.1080/10474410903535364
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications (Vol. 8). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge university press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511815478
Wellman, B., & Frank, K. (2001). Network capital in a multilevel world: Getting support from personal communities. In N. Lin, R.S. Burt & K. Cook (Eds.), Social Capital: Theory and Research (pp. 233-273), New York, NY: Aldine De Gruyter Hawthorne.
Yang, J. T. (2007). Knowledge sharing: Investigating appropriate leadership roles and collaborative culture. Tourism Management, 28, 530-543. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2006.08.006